Y. Hirokawa et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 175–179
179
R3
H N1
R5
R4
R4
N2
R3
O
tBu
ii)
i)
18-22
iii)
i)
23, 24
N2
R6
H
N1
O
25-29
H
30, 31
(CH2)n
R5
18, 25; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = R6 = H
23, 30; R3 = R4 = R5 = H, n = 1
18R, 25R; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = R6 = H
18S, 25S; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = R6 = H
19, 26; R3 = Et, R4 = R5 = R6 = H
20, 27; R3 = R4 = Me, R5 = R6 = H
21, 28; R3 = R5 = Me, R4 = R6 = H
22, 29; R3 = R6 = Me, R4 = R5 = H
24, 31; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = H, n = 0
24R, 31R; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = H, n = 0
24S, 31S; R3 = Me, R4 = R5 = H, n = 0
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (i) 8, K2CO3, NaI, MeCN, reflux, 16 h; (ii) 4 M HCl/AcOEt, rt, quant; (iii) 30% HCl/EtOH, rt, 2 h, quant.
Compound 42, bearing the hexahydro-1,4-diazepine ring as a
central spacer, showed in vitro antibacterial activity practically
comparable to that of 7 against all strains, but its in vivo efficacy
was not improved. Next, we studied the influence of a substituent
in the piperazine ring on the antibacterial activity. Introduction of
a methyl group into the piperazine-carbon atom (N1) on the side of
the purine ring of 7 (yielding the racemic compound 43) caused a
slight increase in in vitro antibacterial activity. Compound 43
appeared to have good in vitro profile against Staphylococci and
Streptococci. However, the in vivo efficacy was less than that of 7.
Comparison of the antibacterial activity of 44, having an (S)-meth-
ylpiperazine spacer, to that of 45, having an (R)-methylpiperazine
spacer, indicated that the former compound was more potent.
However, 44 showed no improvement in in vivo efficacy when
compared to 7. As for 44 bearing the racemic 3-aminopyrrolidine
ring, compounds 46 and 47 with the optically active 3-aminopyr-
rolidine ring were prepared to probe the steric effect of the amino
group in 44. Neither of these analogues differed significantly from
the parent analogue 44 in vitro antibacterial activity, but the
in vivo efficacy of 46 with (S)-3-aminopyrrolidine was more potent
than that of 44, and the ED50 value was 1.10 mg/kg. The in vivo effi-
cacy of 47 having the 6-[(R)-3-aminopyrrolidin-1-yl]purine moiety
was substantially weaker than that of 44. On the other hand, the
racemic and the (R)-(3-methylaminomethylpyrrolidin-1-yl)purine
derivatives 48 and 49 showed potent in vivo efficacy, and the
ED50 value of 49 was 1.10 mg/kg. Compound 50 bearing the
4-aminopiperidine ring showed an in vitro antibacterial activity
practically comparable to that of 7 against all strains, but its
in vivo efficacy was not improved.
methyl group in the piperazine ring spacer did not significantly
influence the antibacterial activity.
In summary, further studies aimed at the development of pleu-
romutilin derivatives for use in human led to identification of a no-
vel class of pleuromutilin analogues having a piperazine ring
spacer. As a result of SAR, compounds 37 and 40 showing not only
excellent in vitro antibacterial activity against MRSA, PRSP, VRE, S.
pyogenes, and M. catarrhalis, but also potent in vivo efficacy were
identified. The excellent in vivo efficacy of both compounds, which
have good solubility in water, may reflect good pharmacokinetics
and ADME properties. Therefore, this new class of pleuromutilin
appears to have a very promising profile for the treatment of infec-
tions caused by respiratory pathogens.
References and notes
1. Hunt, E. Drugs Future 2000, 25, 1163.
2. Anchel, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 199, 133.
3. Arigoni, D. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1962, 92, 884.
4. Birch, A. J.; Cameron, D. W.; Holzapfel, C. W.; Richards, R. W. Chem. Ind. 1963,
374.
5. Drews, J.; Georgopoulos, G.; Laber, G.; Schutze, E.; Unger, J. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 1975, 7, 507.
6. Hogenauer, G. Eur. J. Biochem. 1975, 52, 93.
7. Riedl, K. J. Antibiot. 1976, 29, 132.
8. Egger, H.; Reinshagen, H. J. Antibiot. 1976, 29, 915.
9. Egger, H.; Reinshagen, H. J. Antibiot. 1976, 29, 923.
10. Hannan, P. C. T.; Windsor, H. M.; Ripley, P. H. Res. Vet. Sci. 1997, 63, 157.
11. (a) Berner, H.; Fischer, G.; Hildebrandt, J. F.; Laber, G.; Vyplel, H. Curr.
Chemother. Immunother. 1982, 1, 345; (b) Hildebrandt, J. F.; Berner, H.; Laber,
G.; Turnowsky, F.; Schütze, E. Curr. Chemother. Immunother. 1982, 1, 346; (c)
Wenzel, A. F.; Baumgartner, R.; Georgopoulos, A.; Hildebrandt, J. F.; Laber, G.;
Schütze, E.; Walzl, H. Curr. Chemother. Immunother. 1982, 1, 347.
12. Ganzinger, U.; Stephen, A.; Obenaus, H.; Baumgartner, R.; Walzl, H.;
Brüggemann, S.; Schmid, B.; Racine, R.; Schatz, F.; Haberl, H. Abstract PS 4.6/
2-14, Presented at the 13th International Congress on Chemotherapy, Vienna,
August 28–September 2, 1983.
13. Draghi, D.; Scangarella, N.; Shawar, R.; Sahm, D. Abstract 1900, Presented at the
45th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,
Washington, DC, December 16–19, 2005.
14. Nefzger, M.; Batting, F.; Czok, R. Abstract PS 4.6/2-12, Presented at the 13th
International Congress on Chemotherapy, Vienna, August 28–September 2,
1983.
15. Hirokawa, Y.; Kinoshita, H.; Tanaka, T.; Nakamura, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Kashimoto, S.;
Kojima, T.; Kato, S. BioMed. Chem. Lett., preceding communication in this issue.
16. Hirokawa, Y.; Kinoshita, H.; Tanaka, T.; Nakamura, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Kashimoto,
S.; Kojima, T.; Kato, S. BioMed. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 3556.
17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, 5th ed.;
Approved Standard M7 A5; National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards:
Wayne, PA, 2000.
Introduction of an ethyl group or two methyl groups into the
piperazine ring spacer of 7 (yielding racemic compound 51 or
52–54, respectively) significantly decreased the in vivo efficacy de-
spite high in vitro antibacterial activity.
Finally, introduction of a methyl group into the piperazine-
carbon atom on the side (N2) of the mutilin ring of 7 gave the
racemic compound 55, whose in vitro and in vivo antibacterial
activities was comparable to that of the corresponding counter-
part 43. Next, the stereochemistry at the methyl group on the
pyrrolidine ring of 55 was examined. Compound 56 with (S)-
methylpiperazine and the (R)-methylpiperazine analogue 57
showed no improvement in the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial
activities compared with the racemic compound 55. For methyl-
piperazine analogues, the position and stereochemistry of the