4660
P. Coghi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4658–4660
Table 3
References
L. donovani inhibition assay results and yields for compounds 1–18
1. Stuart, K.; Brun, R.; Croft, S.; Fairlamb, A.; Gurtler Ricardo, E.; McKerrow, J.;
Reed, S.; Tarleton, R. J. Clin. Invest. 2008, 118, 1301.
2. Mishra, J.; Saxena, A.; Singh, S. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1153.
3. de Castro, S. L.; Santa-Rita, R. M.; Urbina, J. A.; Croft, S. L. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem.
2004, 4, 141.
4. Mollinedo, F. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2007, 17, 385.
5. Croft, S. L.; Snowdon, D.; Yardley, V. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1996, 38,
1041.
6. Mollinedo, F.; Fernandez-Luna, J. L.; Gajate, C.; Martin-Martin, B.; Benito, A.;
Martinez-Dalmau, R.; Modotell, M. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 1320.
7. Croft, S. L.; Seifert, K.; Duchene, M. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003, 126, 165.
8. Croft, S. L.; Barrett, M. P.; Urbina, J. A. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 508.
9. Herwaldt, B. L. N. Eng. J. Med. 1999, 341, 1840.
10. Sindermann, H.; Engel, K. R.; Fischer, C.; Bommer, W. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39,
1520.
11. Brachwitz, H.; Vollgraf, C. Pharmacol. Ther. 1995, 66, 39.
12. Wieder, T.; Reutter, W.; Orfanos, C. E.; Geilen, C. C. Prog. Lipid Res. 1999, 38, 249.
13. Saugar, J. M.; Delgado, J.; Hornillos, V.; Luque-Ortega, J. R.; Amat-Guerri, F.;
Acuna, A. U.; Rivas, L. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5994.
14. Calogeropoulou, T.; Angelou, P.; Detsi, A.; Fragiadaki, I.; Scoulica, E. J. Med.
Chem. 2008, 51, 897.
15. Kapou, A.; Benetis, N. P.; Avlonitis, N.; Calogeropoulou, T.; Koufaki, M.;
Scoulica, E.; Nikolaropoulos, S. S.; Mavromoustakos, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007,
15, 1252.
16. Avlonitis, N.; Lekka, E.; Detsi, A.; Koufaki, M.; Calogeropoulou, T.; Scoulica, E.;
Siapi, E.; Kyrikou, I.; Mavromoustakos, T.; Tsotinis, A.; Grdadolnik, S. G.;
Makriyannis, A. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 755.
Compound
L. donovani
M)
Inhibition IC50
(l
Yieldsa (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4.15
>50
>50
26.7
13.8
33.1
>50
>50
28.2
>50
42.5
>50
>50
>50
6.75
1.60
0.66
1.30
22
10
15
33
13
15
19
20
17
17
35
27
25
28
36
27
19
20
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Miltefosine
0.22–0.27
a
Yields calculated as the ratio of isolated product and polymer-bound diol 19.
17. Houlihan, W. J.; Lohmeyer, M.; Workman, P.; Cheon, S. H. Med. Res. Rev. 1995,
15, 157.
activities: compounds 5 and 1, both characterized by the benzyl
group in R1, were the most active ones (IC50 of 13.8 and 4.15
respectively).
lM,
18. Crowley, J. I.; Rapoport, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1976, 9, 135.
19. Thompson, L. A.; Ellman, J. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 9333.
20. The diol (15 mmol/g of resin) was dissolved in 1,2-dichloroethane (15 ml/g of
resin), Merrifield’s peptide resin (loading 1.0–1.5 mmol/g; 1% cross-linked)
functionalized with Elmann’s dihydropyranyl linker was added and the
mixture stirred at 60 °C for one hour. After this time, PPTS (0.50 mmol/g of
polymeric support) was added and the mixture stirred at 60 °C for 12 h. The
resin was filtered, washed with CH2Cl2 (3 times), and finally dried at 60 °C
under reduced pressure.
21. The resin (loading 1.0–1.5 mmol/g) was solvated under stirring at 60 °C in
anhydrous DMA (2 ml/100–150 mg of resin). t-ButOK was then added
(20 mmol/mmol of polymer-bound diol) and the mixture stirred vigorously
at 60 °C for 10 min. The halogenide (1 equivalent) was then added and the
resin was stirred at 60 °C for 12 h. Successively the mixture was diluted with
H2O/DMF 1:1, filtered, washed with H2O (3 times), DMF (3 times), and finally
with CH2Cl2 (3 times).
22. Rampy, M. A.; Pinchuk, A. N.; Weichert, J. P.; Skinner, R. W. S.; Fisher, S. J.;
Wahl, R. L.; Gross, M. D.; Counsell, R. E. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3156.
23. Characterization of compound 17: HPLC purity: >99% C18 reverse-phase
column (4.0 Â 250 mm), detection at 206 and 254 nm (diode array detector),
eluent: MeOH–H2O 9:1 v/v plus 10 mM H3PO4; flow rate of 1.2 ml minÀ1, tR
9.6 min; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 0.81 (t, 3H, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.19 (br s, 30H), 1.34–1.38
(m, 2H), 3.18 (s, 9H), 3.25–3.67 (m, 5H), 3.72–3.87 (m, 2H), 4.12 (m, 2H), 6.00
(m, 2H), 7.34–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.66–7.69 (m, 1H), 7.96–7.99
(m, 1H). Mass: [M+H]+: m/z 641.5, [M+Na+]: m/z 663.3.
Compound 17 was also tested in L. donovani infected macro-
phages and resulted (IC50 0.78 M), appreciably more active than
the reference drug miltefosine (IC50 1.74 M).
l
l
From the resultsobtained, it is clear thatan adequatelevel of lipo-
philicity is required in order to improve the antiparasitic activity.
The most active compound obtained is characterized by the C18
chain at R2. This is interesting since it is known that edelfosine ana-
logues which have the C18 chain in this position do not show induc-
tion of apoptosis.6 This indicates that the mechanism of antiparasitic
action of these compounds is probably different from the antitumor
mode of action which is based on induction of apoptosis. The good
intracellularactivityofcompound17supportsfurtheranaloguesyn-
thesis to identify new potential antileishmanial candidates.
Acknowledgment
This investigation received financial assistance from UNICEF/
UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and
Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR).
24. Tasdemir, D.; Kaiser, M.; Brun, R.; Yardley, V.; Schmidt, T. J.; Tosun, F.; Ruedi, P.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1352.