C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Thermal Stabilities of J-W Triplexes
Table 1. Thermal Stabilities of J-W Triplexes
-X X X X X X X X-
TM
X-Y
wedge strand
TM
-C C C C C C C C-
-C A C C C C C C-
-C A C C C A C C-
-C A C C C A C A-
-A A A A C A A A-
46.9, 69.8 ((0.3) °C
44.3, 69.1 ((0.4)
34.2, 67.6 ((0.7)
19.9, 67.2 ((0.7)
T-C
T-A
T-C
G-C
W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1K
W1W1W1W1W1W1W1W1K
W1W1W1W1W2W1W1W1K
W1W1W1W1W2W1W1W1K
45.8, 69.2 ((0.5) °C
44.9, 69.1 ((0.5)
36.4, 70.1 ((0.3)
46.9, 69.8 ((0.3)
-
78.7
also prepared two DNA sequences in which T-C was used for the
target for W1 and G-C was used for the target of W2 (Table 1).14
The observed TM values for the (W1)8K probe and the T-C target
was 45.8 and 69.2 °C. The latter transition corresponds to the
duplex-random coil equilibrium and the former characterizes the
triplex-duplex equilibrium. Introduction of one W2 residue into
the probe strand should represent a mismatch condition for the all
T-C target, and in fact the TM characterizing the triplex-duplex
equilibrium in this case decreased by roughly 9 to 36.4 °C (Table
1). When the T-C target at the W2 site was changed to the canonical
G-C base pair, the target for W2, the TM value characterizing the
triplex-duplex equilibrium rose by over 10 to 46.9 °C (Table 1).
It is noteworthy that placing a single W2 residue into a sequence
that targets T-C residues results in a significant decrease in TM value
and that thermal stability is recovered when the G-C target is place
to interact with the W2 residue. An examination of potential
hydrogen bonding interactions for the T-W2-C base triplet suggests
the formation of an essentially isomorphic base triplet (Figure 2),
but the existence of such a base triplet does not contradict the data.
The measured TM values simply indicate a loss in complex thermal
stability when T-C is the target for W2. A more destabilizing
mismatch situation would likely result in complete dissociation of
the triplex. The reduction in thermal stability likely arises from
effects including (i) the tridentate interaction with G versus a
bidentate interaction with T, (ii) reduced base stacking effects for
a pyrimidine versus a purine, and (iii) unfavorable dipole-dipole
interactions (Figure 2).
Replacement of various C residues in the target sequences with
A residues results in binding to an increased number of A-T base
pairs by the W1 residues (Table 2).14 The temperature for first
transitions for these complexes decreased with increasing A content,
likely reflecting the formation of base triplets with a total of five
hydrogen bonds (see Figure 1a) in place of the T-W1-C base triplets
containing six hydrogen bonds. When the target sequence contained
only A-T and G-C base pairs, the PNA 8-mer was unable to form
a stable Janus-Wedge triplex. Presumably the eight-residue probe
sequence is simply not long enough to effectively invade the target
duplex and form the stable triplex when competing duplex formation
is also possible.
triplex as -15.3 kcal/mol (50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2). While
this value reflects effective binding interactions through the J-W
format, it will be moderated when strand invasion is required.
Binding of the PNA sequence containing the W2 residue to the
target DNA containing a G-C base pair (Table 1) was also
confirmed by nondenaturing PAGE analysis, which resulted in a
KD of 12 nM (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Gel shift assay for (W1)4W2(W1)3K and DNA (G-C, Table 1).
Initial studies with a longer (W1)14K sequence targeting an A14-
T14 duplex have indicated the formation of a stable complex on
the basis of thermal melting analysis and a fluorescence-based assay
in which an A-T selective minor groove-binding fluorophore is
displaced from the target duplex upon complex formation with the
J-W strand (see Supporting Information).
To target all four base pairs we need to design derivatives that
can discriminate all four base pairs. We expect that these residues
will exhibit both base-pair selectivity and enhanced stability in part
as the result of better base-stacking between the J-W residues.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the NSF (MCB
0451448).
Supporting Information Available: Synthetic schemes, procedures,
and thermal analyses. This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) Moser, H. E.; Dervan, P. B. Science 1987, 238, 645–50.
(2) Francois, J. C.; Saison-Behmoaras, T.; Helene, C. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988,
16, 11431–40.
(3) Griffin, L. C.; Dervan, P. B. Science 1989, 245, 967–71.
(4) Gianolio, D. A.; McLaughlin, L. W. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1999, 18,
1751–69.
(5) Li, J.-S.; Fan, Y.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Marky, L. A.; Gold, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 2084–93.
The stability of the Dervan/Helene (T-A-T)10 triplex is reported
to be -6.6 kcal/mol under optimal conditions (2 M NaCl, 50 mM
MgCl2).15 We have reported10 the stability of the (T-W1-C)8 J-W
(6) Horne, D. A.; Dervan, P. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2435–37.
(7) Jayasena, S. D.; Johnston, B. H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 5279–88.
(8) Gowers, D. M.; Fox, K. R. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1569–77.
(9) Branda, N.; Kurz, G.; Lehn, J. M. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2443–44.
(10) Chen, D.; Fraley, A. W.; Meena; Sharma, S. K.; McLaughlin, L. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 70–71.
(11) Nielsen, P. E.; Egholm, M.; Berg, R. H.; Buchardt, O. Science 1991, 254,
1497–1500.
(12) Yuan, C.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11777–84.
(13) Yuan, C.; Williams, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 1945–48.
(14) Errors in Tables 1 and 2 are reported for the first transitions.
(15) Pilch, D. S.; Brousseau, R.; Shafer, R. H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18,
5743–50.
Figure 2. Proposed structure of a T-W2-C base triplet.
JA804607V
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 40, 2008 13191