J. Ding et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 3549–3553
3553
M.; Jiang, J.; Callender, C. L.; Stupak, J. Macromolecules 2007, 40,
3145; (c) Ding, J.; Day, M. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 6054; (d) Ding,
J.; Qi, Y.; Day, M.; Jiang, J.; Callender, C. L. Macromol. Chem. Phys.
2005, 206, 2396.
impurities. NMR analyses indicated that they were related
to cis-isomer of PVT-BPE. The PVT unit was synthesized
from the Wittig reaction. Accompanying the predominant
trans-isomer, a small amount of the cis-isomer was also
formed.11 The content of the cis-isomer was estimated to
5. Synthesis of P(A-TCNE)SO: P(A-PVT)SO (0.109 g, 0.1 mmol of
PVT unit) and TCNE (0.051 g, 0.4 mmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of
anhydrous DMF at 0 °C. The solution was stirred at 0 °C for 3 h and
then dropped into 10 mL of methanol to precipitate the polymer at 0
°C; the pale green powder was collected using centrifuge and washed
with cold methanol 3 times and dried at room temperature under
vacuum for 12 h (0.095 g, 78% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-
1
be ꢀ8% from the H NMR analysis. If this cis-structure
remained in the final TCNE substituted product, it would
act as a bending linkage between the electron-donating and
electron-accepting units, resulting in lower electro-optic
efficiency than the linear trans-counterpart. The reversible
process of the [2+2] cycloaddition has favorably converted
all the cis-isomer into the trans-isomer, showing a similar
effect as the iodine treatment.12 This effect is evidenced by
the absence of peaks from the cis-isomer in the NMR spec-
trum of the final product (24 h) in Figure 3.
d6):
d (ppm) 7.710–7.620 m, 7.46 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.330 (d,
J = 8.58 Hz), 7.220–7.090 (m), 7.040 (d, J = 8.58 Hz), 7.010–6.930
(m), 5.737 (d, J = 12.8 Hz), 5.337 (d, J = 12.8 Hz); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, acetone-d6): d (ppm) 157.7, 154.0, 153.4, 150.5, 148.1,
147.9, 145.5, 145.3, 145.1, 144.5, 144.0, 143.9, 141.4, 134.5 132.9,
132.5, 130.4, 130.2, 129.9, 129.8, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 127.8, 126.9,
126.7, 125.1, 124.8, 123.7, 122.2, 121.4, 118.4, 118.3, 116.9, 111.9,
111.6, 110.62, 110.57, 53.9, 47.8, 43.9, 43.1. 19F NMR (376 MHz,
acetone-d6): d (ppm) ꢁ63.80 (6F, m), ꢁ137.44 (4F, m), ꢁ137.65 (8F,
m), ꢁ151.97 (4F, m), 152.46 (8F, m). IR (cmꢁ1): 2976, 2872, (CH
stretching), 1637, 1604, 1501, 1491 (sh) (phenyl ring), 1389, 1319,
1295, 1260, 1197, 1177, 1097, 1065, 997, 829, 599. Mn: 19,000 Da.
Mw/Mn: 1.8.
It is worth to note that a new singlet appeared at d
6.23 ppm in all of the spectra recorded from reaction solu-
tions in DMF-d7 except in carefully dried solvent. Its inten-
sity increased gradually with reaction time. Some additional
features of this peak are following: (1) It appeared immedi-
ately after the addition of TCNE and was accompanied
with the shift or disappearance of the water signal at
3.61 ppm; (2) its maximum intensity was similar to the
intensity of water signal in the PVT-BPE spectrum; (3) it
6. Synthesis of P(A-TCVT)SO: P(A-PVT)SO (0.1091 g, 0.1 mmol of
PVT unit) and TCNE (0.051 g, 0.4 mmol) were dissolved in 0.5 mL of
anhydrous DMF. The solution was stirred at 50 °C for 16 h and then
dropped into 10 mL of methanol to precipitate the polymer; the deep
blue powder was collected by centrifuge and was washed with
methanol 3 times and dried at room temperature under vacuum for
1
was not found in the purified final product. H and 2D
1
12 h (0.090 g, 76% yield). H NMR (400 MHz, acetone- d6): d (ppm)
NMR studies of TCNE in DMF-d7 indicated that this
peak is attributed to HCN formed from the hydrolysis of
TCNE.7 This side reaction could compete with the substitu-
tion reaction by consuming extra TCNE, and it could be
prevented when an anhydrous solvent was used.
8.090–7.940 (m), 7.650–7.380 (m), 7.36–6.84 (m); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, acetone-d6): d (ppm) 159.4, 157.8, 154.2, 150.3, 148.1,
148.0, 145.5, 145.4, 145.2, 144.3, 144.0, 143.9, 142.7, 141.5, 140.6,
139.6, 137.3, 132.9, 132.3, 130.1, 129.9, 128.7, 128.1, 126.8, 126.5,
123.7, 121.7, 118.5, 117.8, 117.0, 114.0, 113.9, 81.6, 64.7 (m), 49.8; 19
F
NMR (376 MHz, acetone-d6): d (ppm) ꢁ63.80 (6F, m), ꢁ137.54 (4F,
m), ꢁ137.96 (8F, m), ꢁ152.40 (4F, m), 152.92 (8F, m); IR (cmꢁ1):
2972, 2873, (CH stretching), 2218, 1637, 1604, 1588, 1499, 1492 (sh)
(phenyl ring), 1422, 1391, 1321, 1296, 1261, 1183, 1168, 1097, 1075,
997, 824, 598. Tg: 217 °C. Mp: 20,100 Da.
In conclusion, the substitution reaction of PVT units in
polymer and in a model compound with TCNE does not
occur straightaway in DMF. TCNE first adds to the vinyl-
ene moiety in PVT to form a [2+2] cycloaddition product
rapidly at room temperature. It is then reverted to PVT
unit at 50 °C, and immediately followed by the substitution
reaction. This reversible cycloaddition converts the cis-iso-
mer of PVT units into the trans-counterparts. It is expected
to produce better performance of the final TCNE substi-
tuted product as a non-linear optical material.
7. Dombi, G.; Diehl, P.; Lounila, J.; Wasser, R. Org. Magn. Reson.
1984, 22, 573.
8. Miller, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2508.
9. (a) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, 5th
ed.; John Wiley & Son: New York, 1992; p 1077; (b) Williams, J. K.;
Wiley, D. W.; McKusick, B. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 2210; (c)
Huisgen, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1977, 10, 117.
10. Characterization of TCVT-BPE: 1H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d6): d
(ppm) 8.048 (1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz, H-900), 7.622 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-
300), 7.519 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-500), 7.506 (1H, d, J = 4.4 Hz, H-800),
7.410 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-600), 6.968 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-200),
4.546 (4H, t, J = 5.6 Hz, H-e00), 4.098 (4H, t, J = 5.6 Hz, H-f00); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, acetone-d6): d (ppm) 160.8 (s, C-700), 150.1 (s, C-100),
142.9 (s, C-900), 142.7 (d, JC–F = 238 Hz, C-b00 or C-c00), 139.0 (d, JC–F
= 238 Hz, C-b00 or C-c00), 138.8 (s, c-500), 138.1 (d, JCꢁF = 235 Hz, C-
a00), 134.8 (m, C-d00), 132.5 (s, C-1000), 131.9 (s, C-1100), 130.8 (s, C-300),
128.1 (s, C-800), 125.3 (s, C-400), 116.5 (s, C-600), 114.2 (s, CNs), 113.5 (s,
C-200), 80.2 (s, C-1200), 74.2 (s, C-e00), 51.7 (s, C-f00). IR (cmꢁ1): 3062,
2972, 2875 (CH stretching), 2218, 1637, 1603 (sh), 1588, 1522 (sh),
1500, 1422, 1320, 1296, 1261, 1176, 1097, 1075, 998, 824, 673, 646,
598. Tm: 189.0 °C. MS: calcd for C33H16F10N4O2S: 722.1; found m/z:
723.1 (M+1).
References and notes
1. (a) Cai, C.; Liakatas, I.; Wong, M.-S.; Bo¨sch, M.; Bosshard, C.;
Gunter, P.; Concilio, S.; Tirelli, N.; Suter, U. W.. Org. Lett. 1999,
¨
1, 1847; (b) Shu, C.-F.; Wang, Y.-K. . J. Mater. Chem. 1998, 8,
833.
2. (a) Spraul, B. K.; Suresh, S.; Sassa, T.; Herranz, M. A.; Echegoyen, L.;
´
Wada, T.; Perahia, D.; Smith, D. W., Jr. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
3253; (b) Jen, A. K.-Y.; Cai, Y.; Bedworth, P. V.; Marder, S. R. Adv.
Mater. 1997, 9, 132; (c) Rao, V. P.; Jen, A. K.-Y.; Wong, K. Y.; Drost,
K. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993, 1118; (d) Diaz, J. L.;
Dobarro, A.; Villacampa, B.; Velasco, D. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 2528.
3. (a) Ushiwata, T.; Okamoto, E.; Komatsu, K.; Kaino, T.; Jen, A. K.-Y.
Opt. Mater. 2002, 21, 61; (b) Woo, H. Y.; Shim, H.-K.; Lee, K.-S.
Synth. Met. 1999, 101, 136.
11. Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, fifth
ed.; John Wiley & Son: New York, 1992; p 1235.
12. Halim, M.; Pillow, J. N. C.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Burn, P. L. Adv. Mater.
1999, 11, 371.
4. (a) Aljoumaa, K.; Ishow, E.; Ding, J.; Qi, Y.; Day, M.; Delaire, J. A.
Nonlinear Opt. Quantum Opt. 2006, 35, 83; (b) Ding, J.; Du, X.; Day,