C. M. Wiscount et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4581–4583
4583
Table 2
gests that they are more highly bound to serum proteins than the
des-chloro analogs and their antiviral potencies in the presence of
human serum are less optimal (IC95 >100 nM). Overall, the two N-
isopropyl analogs 16 and 20 exhibited a favorable combination of
properties from the standpoint of antiviral potency in the presence
of 50% NHS, potency against the three mutants, and pharmacoki-
netic properties in rats. Both compounds were additionally charac-
terized in an integrase-catalyzed strand-transfer assay9 and
exhibited potent inhibition with IC50 values 610 nM (lower limit
of the assay). In a single-cycle replication assay using virus that
incorporates a Q148K mutation in integrase10, a mutation which
confers ꢀ50-fold resistance to RaltegravirTM, 16 and 20 showed dif-
ferential activity with shifts versus wild-type virus of 3- and 45-
fold, respectively. In pharmacokinetic experiments in male beagle
dogs, poor oral bioavailability (<5%), moderate clearance
(ꢀ10 mL/min/kg), and short intravenous half-lives (ꢀ1 h) were ob-
served for both 16 and 20.
Summary and conclusion: Modification of a previously reported
pyrazino-pyrrolopyrazine integrase inhibitor by changing one of
the pyrazinone rings to a pyridazinone improved chemical proper-
ties such that stable alkali metal salts could be prepared and used
for oral dosing in pharmacokinetic experiments. Addition of small
aliphatic groups to the pyrazinopyrrolopyridazine core provided a
means to obtain potent antiviral activity in cell culture against
wild-type virus as well as viruses which contain mutations in
integrase that confer resistance to integrase inhibitors from three
different structural classes. From these studies, 16 was found to
possess a number of favorable attributes: antiviral IC95 = 35 nM
in the presence of 50% NHS against HIV-1 in cell culture; 1- to 3-
fold shift in potency against viruses that contain resistance-confer-
ring mutations to diketoacid, naphthyridine, and pyrimidine clas-
ses of integrase inhibitors; and modest oral bioavailability and
plasma half-life in rats (F = 17%, intravenous t1/2 = 5.3 h). Com-
pound 16 thus represents a promising lead for further optimization
studies toward second-generation integrase strand-transfer
inhibitors.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of selected compounds in male Sprague–Dawley ratsa
Compound
CL (mL/min/kg)
Vd (L/kg)
t1/2 (h)
%F
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
17
3.0
2.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
6.2
5.3
6.0
5.2
12
7
17
31
13
21
13
14
0.50
0.68
0.17
0.27
0.17
9.5
13
a
Compounds were dosed orally as sodium salts at a dose of 10 mg/kg in 0.5%
methocel suspension and intravenously as parent phenols at a dose of 2 mg/kg in
1:2 DMSO:H2O solution. Clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life values were
calculated from the intravenous experiments.
ity experiments, wild-type virus as well as viruses containing
integrase mutations that confer resistance to diketoacid and naph-
thyridine strand-transfer inhibitors8 were used to assess potency
of test compounds. Selected compounds were tested for pharmaco-
kinetic behavior in male Sprague–Dawley rats. Compounds were
dosed orally as sodium salts in 0.5% methocel suspension at
10 mg/kg and intravenously as parent phenols in 1:2 DMSO:H2O
solution at 2 mg/kg, using three animals per dose group. Plasma
drug levels were measured at 10 time points between 0.2 and
24 h in the intravenous experiments and at eight time points be-
tween 0.2 and 24 h in the oral experiments.
Results and discussion: The parent compound in this series, 11,
demonstrated that this scaffold is capable of producing good anti-
viral activity in cell culture with minimal shift in potency in the
presence of 50% normal human serum (NHS). However, 11 suffers
a 10- to 50-fold loss in potency against three integrase mutants,
F121Y, N155S, and T66I/S153Y. Addition of a methyl group at R2
on the pyridazinone ring (12) improved antiviral potency by 3-fold
but did not improve potency against the mutants. Addition of an-
other methyl group at R3 on the piperazinone ring had a significant
effect on potency: compared to 12 in the multi-cycle assay, the S
isomer (13) gained 4-fold in potency whereas the R isomer (14)
lost 5-fold in potency. A similarly large difference in potency favor-
ing the S-isomer was observed with enantiomers 17 and 18, and
we therefore focused our attention exclusively on analogs in the
S-series for additional structure-activity studies. Two analogs of
13 with larger piperazinone N-substituents at R4, 15 and 16, main-
tained antiviral potency and showed significantly improved po-
tency against the three integrase mutants. In pharmacokinetic
experiments (see Table 2), 15 and 16 exhibited modest oral bio-
availability with moderate to low clearance, and half-lives in the
range of 5–6 h. Compounds 15 and 16 thus demonstrated that this
series was capable of delivering orally bioavailable analogs with
high antiviral potency and excellent activity against integrase mu-
tants. In the related series with R2 = H, the antiviral potency of the
achiral gem-dimethyl analog 19 compares more closely to that of
the S-monomethyl analog 17 than the R-monomethyl analog 18.
The gem-dimethyl analog 19 did not provide any advantage for po-
tency against the mutants. In comparing the potencies of the
R4 = ethyl and isopropyl analogs in the two series with R2 = H or
methyl (17 and 20 vs 15 and 16), it is seen that that there is a slight
advantage for the series with R2 = methyl in terms of antiviral po-
tency and activity against mutants. However, 17 and 20 in the
R2 = H series exhibited lower clearance in pharmacokinetic exper-
iments in rats. Additionally, 20 exhibited a long plasma half-life of
12 h after intravenous administration. The chloro analogs, 21 and
22, demonstrated an upper limit for lipophilicity: in the multi-cy-
cle viral replication assay these two compounds exhibited a 5- to
6-fold shift when comparing potencies in the 10% FBS and 50%
NHS experiments, whereas the des-chloro analogs in Table 1 exhib-
ited a shift of only 2- to 3-fold. The greater shift for 21 and 22 sug-
References
1. Anthony, N. J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 979; Egbertson, M. S. Curr. Top.
Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 1251.
2. Fisher, T. E.; Kim, B.; Staas, D. D.; Lyle, T. A.; Young, S. D.; Vacca, J. P.; Zrada, M.
M.; Hazuda, D. J.; Felock, P. J.; Schleif, W. A.; Gabryelski, L. J.; Anari, M. R.;
Kochansky, C. J.; Wai, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6511.
3. Grobler, J. A.; Stillmock, K.; Hu, B.; Witmer, M.; Felock, P.; Espeseth, A. S.; Wolfe,
A.; Egbertson, M.; Bourgeois, M.; Melamed, J.; Wai, J. S.; Young, S. D.; Vacca, J.
P.; Hazuda, D. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 6661.
4. Armarego, W. L. F.; Waring, P.; Williams, J. W. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
1980, 8, 334.
5. Fehrentz, J. A.; Castro, B. Synthesis 1983, 8, 676.
6. Williams, T. M.; Bergman, J. M.; Brashear, K.; Breslin, M. J.; Dinsmore, C. J.;
Hutchinson, J. H.; MacTough, S. C.; Stump, C. A.; Wei, D. D.; Zartman, C. B.;
Bogusky, M. J.; Culberson, J. C.; Buser-Doepner, C.; Davide, J.; Greenberg, I. B.;
Hamilton, K. A.; Koblan, K. S.; Kohl, N. E.; Liu, D.; Lobell, R. B.; Mosser, S. D.;
O’Neill, T. J.; Rands, E.; Schaber, M. D.; Wilson, F.; Senderak, E.; Motzel, S. L.;
Gibb, J. B.; Graham, S. L.; Heimbrook, D. C.; Hartman, G. D.; Oliff, A. I.; Huff, J. R.
J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3779.
7. Vacca, J. P.; Dorsey, B. D.; Schleif, W. A.; Levin, R. B.; McDaniel, S. L.; Darke, P. L.;
Zugay, J.; Quintero, J. C.; Blahy, O. M.; Roth, E.; Sardana, V. V.; Schlabac, A. J.;
Graham, P. I.; Condra, J. H.; Gotlib, L.; Holloway, M. K.; Lim, J.; Chen, I.-W.;
Vastag, K.; Ostovic, D.; Anderson, P. S.; Emini, E. E.; Huff, J. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1994, 91, 4096.
8. Hazuda, D. J.; Anthony, N. J.; Gomez, R. P.; Jolly, S. M.; Wai, J. S.; Zhuang, L.;
Fisher, T. E.; Embrey, M.; Guare, J. P.; Egbertson, M. S.; Vacca, J. P.; Huff, J. R.;
Felock, P. J.; Witmer, M. V.; Stillmock, K. A.; Danovich, R.; Grobler, J.; Miller, M.
D.; Espeseth, A. S.; Jin, L.; Chen, I.-W.; Lin, J. H.; Kassahun, K.; Ellis, J. D.; Wong,
B. K.; Xu, W.; Pearson, P. G.; Schleif, W. A.; Cortese, R.; Emini, E.; Summa, V.;
Holloway, M. K.; Young, S. D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 11233.
9. Hazuda, D. J.; Felock, P.; Hastings, J. C.; Pramanik, B.; Wolfe, A. J. Virol. 1997, 71,
7005.
10. Ke, Y; Danovich, R. M.; personal communication. See also Cooper, D., Gatell, J.;
Rockstroh, J.; Katlama, C.; Yeni, P.; Lazzarin, A.; Chen, J.; Isaacs, R.; Teppler, H.;
Nguyen, B.; 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections,
February 25–28, 2007.