trisubstituted double bonds and the long reaction times are
still drawbacks to be overcome. Besides, in contrast to
sulfonimines,5 Lewis acids are required for the less electro-
philic sulfinimines.
As an alternative to the diastereoselective version of the
Aza-MBH reaction and due to our experience in chiral sulfur
chemistry,6 we envisioned the reaction between metalated
vinyl sulfoxides B and enantiopure N-sulfinimines A7
(Scheme 1) as an efficient access to analogous chiral
sulfinamides C (X ) NSOp-Tol).8
We submitted a number of enantiomerically pure sulfin-
imines (R)-1 and (S)-1 to treatment with (RS,E)-lithio vinyl
sulfoxides [generated from (R)-2 and LDA]10 obtaining in
all cases good to excellent yields (69-98%) and moderate
to high diastereoselectivities of allylic sulfinamides 3 and 4
(Table 1). Moreover, undesired byproducts from self-addition
Table 1. Addition of Lithio Vinyl and Dienyl Sulfoxides to
N-Sulfinimines R-1 and S-1d
Scheme 1. Nucleophilic Addition of Lithio Vinyl Sulfoxides
Previous results revealed a poor stereocontrol for the
addition of lithio vinyl sulfoxides B to aldehydes to afford
equimolecular mixtures of allylic alcohols (C, X ) O).9
Moreover, our first attempt to achieve the analogous nitrogen
adducts using sulfonimines led to a 50:50 mixture of
sulfonamides (C, X ) NTs). However, the additional chiral
sulfur of sulfinimines could provide a double diastereose-
lection scenario based on two chiral sulfur atoms that could
render sulfinamides (C, X ) NSOpTol) with stereocontrol.
Thus, we now report the diastereoselective addition of vinyl
and dienyl sulfoxides to chiral sulfinimines to provide
2-sulfinyl allylic sulfinamides. In addition, we have examined
the reactivity of dienyl sulfinamides C (R′ ) CHdCH2)
finding an efficient entry to enantiopure 3-sulfinyl and
3-sulfonyl 2,5-cis-disubstituted dihydropyrroles.
product
dr
entry
1 (R)
2 (R′)
(yield %)a (3:3′ or 4:4′)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
R-1a (Ph)c
S-1a (Ph)c
R-1a (Ph)
S-1a (Ph)
R-1b (i-Pr) R-2b (CHdCH2)
S-1b (i-Pr) R-2b (CHdCH2)
R-1c (n-Bu) R-2b (CHdCH2)
R-2a (n-Bu)
R-2a (n-Bu)
R-2b (CHdCH2)
R-2b (CHdCH2)
3a(90)
4a(69)
3b(95)
4b(91)
3c(93)
4c(69)
3d(98)
91:9
82:18
99:1
87:13
99:1
75:25
99:1
a Combined yield. b Ratio determined by 1H NMR analysis. c 3.0 equiv
of LDA and 1 was employed. d Comparative matched vs mismatched pair.
of vinyl sulfoxides (R)-2 were not observed under these
conditions. These results highlight the crucial role of the
absolute configuration of the sulfinimine in the process since
both yields and selectivities increased when (R)-1 was
employed (entries 1, 3, 5, and 7, matched pair).
The scope of the reaction was examined by varying the
nature of R in sulfinimines (Table 1, (R)-1a-c, (S)-1a,b).
In addition, alkyl and alkenyl substitution at vinyl sulfoxide
(R)-2a,b gave outstanding yields and selectivities (91:9-99:
1) for the matched pair.
The synthesis of sulfinamide 3b has been carried out on a
3 g scale uneventfully using 3.5 g of N-sulfinimine (R)-1a.
It should be mentioned that the excess of imine is recovered
without racemization after purification of the crude by flash
chromatography.
The stereochemical outcome for the addition can be
understood in terms of a rigid transition state depicted in
Scheme 2, where the lithium coordinates the two oxygen
atoms of sulfoxide (R)-2 and sulfinimine 1.11 The nucleo-
philic addition would take place mostly anti to the p-tolyl
(5) Tosyl imines in Aza-MBH: (a) Lee, H. S.; Kim, J. M.; Kim, J. N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4119–4122. (b) Qi, M. J.; Shi, M. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 10415–10424. (c) Shi, Y. L.; Shi, M. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 461–
475. (d) Balan, D.; Adolfsson, H. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2329–2334.
(6) (a) Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.; Alhambra, C.; Castellanos, A.;
Ferna´ndez, J.; Manzano, P.; Montero, C.; Uren˜a, M.; Viso, A. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 10693–10700. (b) Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.; Castellanos, A.;
Ferna´ndez, J.; Lorenzo, M.; Manzano, P.; Me´ndez, P.; Priego, J.; Viso, A.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1569–1575. (c) Viso, A.; Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla,
R.; Garc´ıa, A.; Flores, A.; Tortosa, M.; Lo´pez-Rodr´ıguez, M. L. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 1442–1448. (d) Viso, A.; Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.;
Garc´ıa, A.; Guerrero-Strachan, C.; Alonso, M.; Tortosa, M.; Flores, A.;
Mart´ınez-Ripoll, M.; Fonseca, I.; Andre´, I.; Rodr´ıguez, A. Chem.-Eur. J.
2003, 9, 2867–2876. (e) Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.; Tortosa, M.; Lwoff,
´
N.; del Aguila, M. A.; Viso, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6716–6727.
(7) For some recent applications of N-sulfinimines: (a) Davis, F. A. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8993–9003. (b) Maji, M. S.; Fro¨hlich, R.; Studer, A.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1847–1850. (c) Almansa, R.; Guijarro, D.; Yus, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 603–606. (d) Lin, G.-Q.; Xu, M.-H.;
Zhong, Y.-W.; Sun, X.-W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 831–840. (e) Morton,
D.; Stockman, R. A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 8869–8905. (f) Beenen, M. A.;
An, C.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6910–6911.
(8) Precedents of diastereoselective reactions of imines and R-sulfinyl
carbanions: (a) Garc´ıa Ruano, J. L.; Alcudia, A.; del Prado, M.; Barros,
D.; Maestro, M. C.; Ferna´ndez, I. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2856–2862. (b)
García Ruano, J. L.; Alema´n, J.; del Prado, M.; Ferna´ndez, I. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 4454–4463. (c) Midura, W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3907–
3910.
(10) Vinyl and dienyl sulfoxides 2 are available in one step by the
procedure of Craig: Craig, D.; Daniels, K.; MacKenzie, A. R. Tetrahedron
1993, 49, 11263-11304.
(9) Marino, J. P.; Anna, L. J.; Ferna´ndez de la Pradilla, R.; Mart´ınez,
M. V.; Montero, C.; Viso, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6462–6473.
4776
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008