4778
P. Bertus et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 4774–4778
transparent mixture until pH 12. The product was extracted with EtOAc (2ꢁ
parameters refinement and the data reduction were achieved with DENZO/
SCALEPACK (see Ref. 33). The crystal structure was solved by direct methods
with SIR97 (see Ref. 34). Because the data were collected with molybdenum
radiation, there were no measurable anomalous differences; as a consequence
it was admissible to merge Friedel pairs of reflections. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically by full-matrix least-squares calculations based on
F using CRYSTALS (see Ref. 35). The H atoms were located in a difference
Fourier map and repositioned geometrically. The H atoms positions and Uiso
were then refined using soft restraints on the bond lengths and angles to
regularize their geometry (C–H in the range 0.93–0.98 Å, O–H = 0.82 Å and
Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5 times equiv of the adjacent atom). In the last cycles of the
refinement, they were refined using a riding model. The absolute configuration
of the structure was obtained with a quick data collection using Cu radiation by
examining the Flack parameter. The molecular and crystal structure drawings
were prepared with DIAMOND (see Ref. 36).
20 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried (MgSO4). After evaporation of
the solvent, the product was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (PE/
EtOAc 1:1) to give 3 as a white solid (0.21 g, 66%). Mp = 222 °C. Rf = 0.66 (PE/EtOAc
20
1:1). [a D
]
ꢂ53.0 (c = 1.05/CH2Cl2). IR (KBr): m
(cmꢂ1) 3351, 1724, 1702, 1645,
1602, 1582, 1525, 1452, 1287. 1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3). d (ppm) 0.86–0.97 (m, 2H,
CH2CH2), 1.25–1.48 (m, 2H, CH2CH2), 2.85 (d, 1H, J = 9.4 Hz, H-1), 3.81 (td, 1H,
J = 9.7, 3.5 Hz, H-2), 4.00 (ddd, 1H, J = 9.7, 5.3, 3.0 Hz, H-5), 4.42 (dd, 1H, J = 12.1,
5.3 Hz, H-6), 4.57 (dd, 1H, J = 12.1, 3.0 Hz, H-60), 5.35 (d, 1H, J = 3.5 Hz, OH), 5.51 (t,
1H, J = 9.7 Hz, H-4), 5.68 (t, 1H, J = 9.7 Hz, H-3), 6.88 (s, 1H, NH), 7.28–7.58 (m, 12H,
H-ar), 7.75 (d, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz, H-ar), 7.90 (d, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz, H-ar), 7.97 (d, 2H,
J = 7.1 Hz, H-ar), 8.02 (d, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz, H-ar). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 63 MHz). d (ppm)
12.1, 14.3 (2s, 2C, CH2CH2), 32.8 (C–N), 63.6 (C-6), 69.7 (C-4), 70.3 (C-2), 74.8 (C-3),
76.2 (C-5), 86.3 (C-1), 127.1 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 128.1 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 128.3 (s, 4C, CH-ar),
128.6 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 128.8 (s, 2C, C-ar), 129.5 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 129.6 (s, 2C, C-ar), 129.7
(s, 4C, CH-ar), 132.2 (CH-ar), 132.8 (CH-ar), 133.0 (CH-ar), 133.2 (CH-ar), 165.4,
166.1, 166.2 (3s, C@O), 169.9 (PhCONH). HR-ESIMS (positive mode). m/z = [M+H]+
C37H34NO9 calcd 636.2234, found 636.2238. Crystallographic data for (3).
30. Allen, F. H.; Watson, D. G.; Brammer, L.; Orpen, A. G.; Taylor, R. International
Tables for Crystallography, 3rd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht,
Netherlands, 2006; Vol. C, Chapter 9.5, pp 790–811.
C
37H33NO9, Mr = 635.64, monoclinic, space group P21 (No. 4); a = 15.651(1),
31. Glycogen phosphorylase inhibition measurements. Glycogen phosphorylase
was prepared from rabbit skeletal muscle according to the method of
Fischer and Krebs (see Ref. 37), using dithiothreitol instead of -cysteine,
b
b = 22.761(2), c = 19.293(1) Å, b = 102.70(1)°; V = 6704.6(8) Å3; Z = 8; F(000) =
2672; Dx = 1.259 g mꢂ3; S = 1.118 R/wR = 0.050/0.057 for 1693 parameters and
L
14319 reflections with I > 2
r
(I), R/wR = 0.0571/0.0662 for all 16391 independent
and recrystallized at least three times before use. Kinetic experiments were
performed in the direction of glycogen synthesis as described previously
(see Ref. 38). Kinetic data for the inhibition of rabbit skeletal muscle
reflections measured in the range 1.082°–27.893°. CCDC 686021 contains
the supplementary crystallographic data for this molecule. These data can
emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre, 12, Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44
1223 336033.
glycogen phosphorylase were collected using different concentrations of
a-
D
-glucose-1-phosphate (2–20 mM), constant concentrations of glycogen (1%
w/v) and AMP (1 mM), and various concentrations of inhibitor. Inhibitor
was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and diluted in the assay buffer
(50 mM triethanolammine, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM dithiothreitol) so that
the DMSO concentration in the assay should be lower than 5%. The
enzymatic activities were presented in the form of double-reciprocal plots
(Lineweaver-Burk) applying a nonlinear data analysis program. The means
of standard errors for all calculated kinetic parameters averaged to less
than 10%. IC50 values were determined in the presence of 4 mM a-D-
glucose-1-phosphate, 1 mM AMP, 1% glycogen, and varying concentrations
of the inhibitor.
26. N-[1-(C-b-
D-glucopyranosyl)cyclopropyl]benzamide
(4).
A
solution
of
cyclopropyl-benzamide
3
(337 mg) and NaOMe (5 mg) in CH2Cl2/MeOH
(10 mL, 1:1) was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The white precipitate
was filtered and washed with petroleum ether (2ꢁ 5 mL) to afford the
hydroxylated benzamide 4 (160 mg, 93%) as a white solid. Mp = 260–262 °C.
ꢂ47.6 (c = 1.03/DMSO). 1H NMR (300 MHz,
20
Rf = 0.47 (EtOAc/MeOH 3:1). [
a
]
D
CD3SOCD3). d (ppm) 0.70–0.96 (m, 3H, CH2CH2), 1.02–1.14 (m, 1H, CH2CH2),
2.52 (m, 1H, H-1), 2.95–3.11 (m, 3H, H-2 H-4 H-5), 3.18 (t, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz, H-3),
3.43 (dd, 1H, J = 11.6, 5.4 Hz, H-6), 3.67 (dd, 1H, J = 11.6, 1.5 Hz, H-60), 7.44 (t,
2H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-ar), 7.54 (t, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-ar), 7.86 (d, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-ar).
13C NMR (75 MHz, CD3SOCD3). d (ppm) 11.4,14.0 (2s, 2C, CH2CH2), 33.0 (C–N),
61.3 (C-6), 70.3 (C-2), 71.9 (C-4), 76.4 (C-3), 80.9 (C-5), 84.7 (C-1), 127.7 (s, 2C,
CH-ar), 128.5 (s, 2C, CH-ar), 132.0 (CH-ar), 133.5 (C-ar), 169.3 (C@O). HR-ESIMS
(positive mode). m/z = 346.2 [M+Na]+, 668.8 [2M+Na]+. HR-ESIMS (negative
mode). m/z = 321.9 [M–H]ꢂ, 358.0 [M+Cl]ꢂ. HR-ESIMS (positive mode). m/
z = [M+Na]+ C16H21NNaO6 calcd 346.1267, found 346.1270.
32. Nonius. COLLECT. Nonius BV, D., The Netherlands, 1997–2001.
33. Otwinowski, Z.; Minor, W.; Carter, C. W., Jr.; Sweet, R. M., Eds.; Academic Press:
New York, 1997; Vol. 276, p 307.
34. Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G. L.; Giacovazzo, C.;
Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A. G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna, R. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999,
32, 115.
35. Betteridge, P. W.; Carruthers, J. R.; Cooper, R. I.; Prout, K.; Watkin, D. J. J. Appl.
Crystallogr. 2003, 36, 1487.
27. Hart, D. J.; Seely, F. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 1631.
28. Bhat, A. S.; Gervay-Hague, J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2081.
36. Brandenburg, K. P. H. DIAMOND. Version 3. Crystal Impact GbR, Postfach 1251,
D-53002 Bonn, Germany, 1996.
29. The intensities were collected at 150 K on a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer
37. Fischer, E. H.; Krebs, E. G. Methods Enzymol. 1962, 5, 369.
38. Oikonomakos, N. G.; Skamnaki, V. T.; Osz, E.; Szilágyi, L.; Somsák, L.; Docsa, T.;
}
using graphite-monochromated MoK
a
radiation (k = 0.71073 Å). The data
collection was carried out by the COLLECT program (see Ref. 32) and cell
Tóth, B.; Gergely, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2002, 10, 261.