Angewandte
Chemie
respective amino-substituted diaryl ethene with 1,7-dipyrro-
lidinylperylene monoanhydride monoimide (see the Support-
ing Information for details). Compound 1o can be switched
between two photostationary states. Upon irradiation with
UV light (lmax = 350 nm) a photostationary state containing
66% of the closed form of the PBI–DAE conjugate 1c
(Scheme 1) was obtained,[12] which could be isolated by
column chromatography. The open form can be regenerated
almost quantitatively (99%) by irradiation of a solution of the
closed form with visible light (l > 400 nm).
Eox(D) and Ered(A) are the first oxidation potential of the
donor perylene bisimide and first reduction potential of the
acceptor DAE, respectively. E00 signifies the spectroscopic
excited state energy, while RCC is the distance between the
centers of the donor and acceptor moieties. The effective
ionic radii of the donor radical cation and acceptor radical
anion are labeled as r+ and rꢀ, respectively. The dielectric
constant of the reference solvent used in electrochemistry is
denoted as eref, while eS is the dielectric constant of the given
solvent.[13]
The fluorescence quantum yields for 1o and 1c were
determined in a series of solvents of different polarity, with
dielectric constants (er) ranging from 2.24 (tetrachlorome-
thane) to 36.71 (dimethylformamide). These values, divided
by the quantum yield of the reference PBI 2 (without a DAE
moiety), are shown as a function of the er values of the
solvents in Figure 2 (see also Table S1 in the Supporting
Compounds 1o and 1c exhibit the characteristic UV/Vis
spectra of 1,7-dipyrrolidinylperylene bisimides, with an
absorption maximum at around 700 nm. The spectrum of 1c
displays some additional bands (in particular, a broadened
absorption band between 450 and 550 nm, see Figure 3) that
are attributed to the closed form of DAE. From the UV/Vis
and fluorescence spectra recorded in dichloromethane an
S0–S1 excitation energy of 1.71 eV was estimated for 1o and
1c.
Figure 2. Fluorescence quantum yields of 1o and 1c (f )divided by
fl
the quantum yield of the reference perylene bisimide 2 (ꢀrflef)without
the DAE moiety as a function of dielectric constants of solvents; open
Figure 3. UV/Vis spectra of 1o (solid line)and 1c (dashed line)in
dichloromethane.
*
*
form ( ), closed form ( ).
Information). In low-polarity solvents such as chloroform
(er = 4.89), the quantum yields of 1o and 1c are nearly
identical to that of the reference dye 2, which indicates that no
fluorescence quenching by the DAEC or DAEO moieties
occurs. Interestingly, the quantum yields of 1o and 1c differ
significantly at higher solvent polarity, and in dimethylforma-
mide (highly polar) almost complete quenching of the closed
form 1c is observed. Fluorescence quenching by FRET from
the excited dye to the closed form of the DAE can be
excluded as a deactivation path. Thus, the increase in the
fluorescence quenching of 1c as the solvent polarity increases
is highly indicative of a preferential PET from the dye to the
closed form of DAE.
The redox potentials of 1o and 1c and the reference
compounds (see Table S2 in the Supporting Information)
were obtained by cyclic voltammetry measurements in
dichloromethane, with ferrocene used as an internal reference
(Figure 4). The cyclic voltammogram of 1o is identical to that
of the reference dye 2 (see Figure S1 in the Supporting
Information). Thus, additional redox processes associated
with the DAEO moiety are apparently not observable within
the available potential window. The first half-wave oxidation
potentials of the PBImoiety were observed at 0.22 V and
0.21 V for 1o and 1c, respectively. The closed form 1c showed
additional waves for the DAE moiety at ꢀ1.60 V and 1.00 V,
in agreement with the reference DAE compound 3c bearing a
phthalic imide residue (see Figure S3 in the Supporting
Information). The first reduction potential of 3o was
observed at ꢀ1.98 V while the respective wave for 1o was
not observable within the available potential range (up to ca.
ꢀ2.0 V). Donor–acceptor distances of 1.32 nm and 1.24 nm
were estimated from the optimized geometries of 1o and 1c
conjugates, respectively.
The Gibbs free energy (DG8) for an intramolecular
charge-separated state of a covalently bound donor–acceptor
system in a given solvent can be estimated using the Rehm–
Weller Equation (1).
DGꢁ ¼ e½EoxðDÞꢀEredðAÞꢀE00
ꢀ
ꢁꢀ
ꢁ
e2
e2
1
1
1
1
Since all experimental values were determined in
dichloromethane, the solvent-related term in the Rehm–
Weller equation can be neglected in the present case, and by
ð1Þ
ꢀ
ꢀ
þ
ꢀ
eref eS
4pe0eS Rcc 8pe0 rþ rꢀ
Rehm ꢀ Weller equation
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6616 –6619
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
6617