334
J. M. Fevig et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 330–335
Table 3
Rat pharmacokinetic data
Table 4
Acute feeding studies in ratsa
Compound
Dose
(mpk)
Cmax
(nM)
AUC 0–4 h
(nM⁄h)
Brain/Plasma
ratio
Cmpd Dose
Pellets consumed (%
+10 mpk 5HT2C Antagonista
(% change from vehicle, 20 h)
(mpk) change from vehicle)
38
41
44
46
48
51
52
10
10
10
10
8
1261
7302 (0–8 h)
6111
7591
42838
5149
22425
15244
1.9
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.3
2 h
8 h
20 h
2370
2395
15783
1694
6688
5117
41
43
48
38
10
10
10
3
10
30
3
10
30
10
0
+2
+2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
+7
À18
À16
À6
+20
0
À4
À80⁄
À98⁄
À100⁄
À9
À31⁄
À51⁄
À88⁄
À12
À33⁄
À53⁄
À46⁄
À26⁄
À34⁄
À54⁄
À10
À19⁄
À34⁄
À30⁄
10
10
44
44
PK studies were performed in SpragueDawley rats using a PO dosing solution of 15%
propylene glycol, 1% tween, 84% water. Plasma sampling of compounds was
determined over a 4 h period except where noted. B/P ratio determined at end of
study.
À71⁄
À94⁄
À94⁄
⁄p <0.05.
a
Effects on feeding in an acute (20 h) rat operant model upon treatment with
selected compounds. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 6) were dosed orally with test
compound or vehicle (14% propylene glycol, 1% tween, 85% water) 60 min prior to
the onset of the dark cycle. Pellets consumed for compound treated animals were
compared to that of vehicle treated animals in order to determine percent reduction
of food intake over a 20 h period. Data is shown for the 2 h, 8 h and 20 h timepoints.
See Ref. 14 for a detailed description of all in vivo studies. For the reversal study of
compound 44, test compound was dosed alone or with 10 mpk of the selective 5-
HT2C antagonist SB-243213.17
tive exposure of the compounds in the brain versus the plasma. In
general, the compounds had reasonable exposures, with
Cmax > 1200 nM when administered orally at a dose of 10 mpk.
Compounds 46, 51 and 52 all had especially high exposures. Brain
to plasma ratios ranged from 0.1 to 1.9 (but trending toward lower
values), with the lower ratios generally arousing concern over the
ability of the compounds to cross the blood–brain barrier. For rea-
sons which are not well understood, those compounds with an
electron-withdrawing C6 substituent (41, 44, 46, 51 and 52) had
lower brain/plasma ratios than those with an electron-donating
C6 substituent (38 and 48). N-methylation of the lactam only mod-
estly increased the brain/plasma ratio (compare 46 vs. 41, and 52
vs. 51).
sired profile of potent 5-HT2C functional activity, no 5-HT2B func-
tional agonism and potent 5-HT2C-mediated reduction of food
intake in a rat acute feeding model.
Acknowledgments
Several of the most promising compounds were selected to as-
sess their ability to reduce feeding in a 20 h rat operant feeding
model, as shown in Table 4. Compounds were dosed 60 min prior
to the onset of the dark cycle (the most active time of feeding)
and the number of food pellets consumed relative to vehicle-trea-
ted animals was assessed at several timepoints to determine per-
cent reduction in feeding. Data for the 2 h, 8 h and 20 h
timepoints is shown. Compounds 41, 43 and 48 failed to elicit a
significant reduction in food intake at any timepoint. Compound
38, which had the highest brain/plasma ratio among this set, sig-
nificantly reduced food intake at all doses tested, with the bulk
of the reduction occurring at the earlier timepoints. Compound
44 was effective at reducing food intake at 10 and 30 mpk. Finally,
a reversal study was performed on compound 44, shown at the
bottom of Table 4, which involved dosing 44 alone or in conjunc-
tion with SB-243213, a selective 5-HT2C antagonist.17 The data
show that co-administration of SB-243213 completely reversed
the food reduction effect, providing strong evidence that the ob-
served feeding effects of 44 were mediated by agonism of the 5-
HT2C receptor.
In summary, it was found that the trans-fused 2,3,3a,4-tetrahy-
dro-1H-pyrrolo[3,4-c]isoquinolin-5(9bH)-one core provided a po-
tent framework to effect 5-HT2C receptor agonism. Substitution
at C6 was required for good potency, while additional substituents
on the aryl ring were found to modulate both 5-HT2C potency and
selectivity versus the 5-HT2B and 5-HT2A receptors. Compounds
such as 41, 48 and 49, were potent 5-HT2C full agonists but were
devoid of 5-HT2B functional potency. This is a critical attribute in
minimizing the risk of heart valvulopathy in this class of com-
pounds. Several compounds were assessed in vivo for their ability
to reduce food intake in a rat acute feeding model. Two analogs, 38
and 44, were found to significantly reduce food intake. The satiety
effect of 44 was completely reversed when co-administered with a
selective 5-HT2C antagonist, demonstrating that this compound
was acting via the 5-HT2C receptor. Despite these attributes, we
have been unable to identify a compound in this series with the de-
The authors wish to thank Mike Galella and Jack Gougoutas for
the determination of the crystal structure of compound 23.
References and notes
2. Ogden, C. L.; Carroll, M. D.; Flegal, K. M. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2003,
32, 741.
3. Foxcroft, D. R.; Milne, R. Obes. Rev. 2000, 1, 121.
4. Ioannides-Demos, L. L.; Proietto, J.; McNeil, J. J. Drugs 2005, 65, 1391.
5. (a) Cooke, D.; Bloom, S. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2006, 5, 919; (b) Neff, L. M.; Aronne,
L. J. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2007, 9, 454.
6. (a) Wacker, D. A.; Miller, K. J. Curr. Opin. Drug Discovery Dev. 2008, 11, 438; (b)
Miller, K. J. Mol. Interventions 2005, 5, 282; (c) Monck, N. J. T.; Kennett, G. A.
Prog. Med. Chem. 2008, 46, 281.
7. Walsh, A. E. S.; Smith, K. A.; Oldman, A. D.; Williams, C.; Goodall, E. M.; Cowen,
P. J. Psychopharmacology 1994, 116, 120.
8. Kennett, G. A.; Wood, M. D.; Bright, F.; Trail, B.; Riley, G.; Holland, V.; Avenell, K.
Y.; Stean, T.; Upton, N.; Bromidge, S.; Forbes, I. T.; Brown, A. M.; Middlemiss, D.
N.; Blackburn, T. P. Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, 609.
9. (a) Tecott, L. H.; Sun, L. M.; Akana, S. F.; Strack, A. M.; Lowenstein, D. H.;
Dallman, M. F.; Julius, D. Nature 1995, 374, 542; (b) Vickers, S. P.; Clifton, P. G.;
Dourish, C. T.; Tecott, L. H. Psychopharmacology 1999, 143, 309.
10. (a) Thomsen, W. J.; Grottick, A. J.; Menzaghi, F.; Reyes-Saldana, H.; Espitia, S.;
Yuskin, D.; Whelan, K.; Martin, M.; Morgan, M.; Chen, W.; Al-Shamma, H.;
Smith, B.; Chalmers, D.; Behan, D. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 325, 577; (b)
Smith, S. R.; Prosser, W. A.; Donahue, D. J.; Morgan, M. E.; Anderson, C. M.;
Shanahan, W. R. Obesity 2009, 17, 494; (c) Smith, B. M.; Smith, J. M.; Tsai, J. H.;
Schultz, J. A.; Gilson, C. A.; Estrada, S. A.; Chen, R. R.; Park, D. M.; Prieto, E. B.;
Gallardo, C. S.; Sengupta, D.; Dosa, P. I.; Covel, J. A.; Ren, A.; Webb, R. R.; Beeley,
N. R. A.; Martin, M.; Morgan, M.; Espitia, S.; Saldana, H. R.; Bjenning, C.;
Whelan, K. T.; Grottick, A. J.; Menzaghi, F.; Thomsen, W. J. J. Med. Chem. 2008,
51, 305.
12. (a) Fitzgerald, L. W.; Burn, T. C.; Brown, B. S.; Patterson, J. P.; Corjay, M. H.;
Valentine, P. A.; Sun, J.-H.; Link, J. R.; Abbaszade, I.; Hollis, J. M.; Largent, B. L.;
Hartig, P. R.; Hollis, G. F.; Meunier, P. C.; Robichaud, A. J.; Robertson, D. W. Mol.
Pharmacol. 2000, 57, 75; (b) Rothman, R. B.; Baumann, M. H.; Savage, J. E.;
Rauser, L.; McBride, A.; Hufeisen, S. J.; Roth, B. L. Circulation 2000, 102, 2836.
13. Lee, T.; Robichaud, A. J.; Chen, W.; Lu, Y.; Dowdell, S.; Boyle, K. E.; Mitchell, I. S.;
Fevig, J. M.; Wexler, R. R.; Miller, K. J.; Largent, B. L.; Rohrbach, K. W.; Devenny,
J. J.; McElroy, J. F. Abstracts of Papers, 229th ACS National Meeting, San Diego,
CA; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2005; MEDI-283.
14. Wacker, D. A.; Varnes, J. G.; Malmstrom, S. E.; Cao, X.; Hung, C.-P.; Ung, T.; Wu,
G.; Zhang, G.; Zuvich, E.; Thomas, M. A.; Keim, W. J.; Cullen, M. J.; Rohrbach, K.