Article
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 20, 2010 9179
of any type appeared in 2001 with the crystallographic char-
acterization of an alkylperoxo-iron(III) moiety in soybean
lipoxygenase.12 Other mononuclear, nonheme iron-peroxide
adducts in proteins that have been crystallographically char-
acterized include naphthalene dioxygenase (peroxo-iron),20
homoprotocatechuate 2,3-dioxygenase (superoxo-, peroxo-,
and alkylperoxo-iron)14,15 and superoxide reductase (SOR)
(peroxo-iron).2 Given the paucity of structures available for
these biologically relevant iron centers, it is important to
obtain structural information on analogous model com-
plexes, although thus far there is no X-ray structure available
for a mononuclear nonheme iron-peroxide model complex.
However, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) has been
successfully employed to gain structural insights into such
model complexes. For example, Kovacs et al. have charac-
terized a rare example of a thiolate-ligated, FeIII-OOH
complex by XAS,21 and Que and co-workers have charac-
terized both high-spin and low-spin nonheme alkylperoxo-
iron(III) intermediates with various polydentate supporting
ligands, mostly derived from pyridyl and/or neutral amine N
donors.22-24
We have been successful in synthesizing a series of
(N4S(thiolate))iron(II) complexes and using them to generate
metastable, low-spin alkylperoxo-iron(III) intermediates.
These complexes were prepared as models of the reduced
(His4Cys)FeII SOR active site and (hydro)peroxo-iron(III)
intermediates that may be important during turnover. SOR
reduces superoxide to hydrogen peroxide as part of a natural
defense mechanism in anaerobic microorganisms, and evi-
dence suggests that a (hydro)peroxo-iron(III) intermediate
may form during turnover. This intermediate must decay
through Fe-O bond cleavage to release H2O2, and avoid
O-O bond cleavage to give unwanted ferryl-type (Fe(O))
species.
cently, we have also succeeded in probing the influence of
the N donors of the [15]aneN4 ligand, which led to the
characterization of some high-spin FeIII-OOR species.27
The vibrational data from RR spectroscopy on the former
series of low-spin FeIII-OOR species showed that the
identity of the thiolate ligand influences the strength of
the Fe-O stretching frequency (ν(Fe-O)), but does not
perturb the O-O vibration. As the thiolate becomes more
electron-donating, a weakening of ν(Fe-O) is observed,
consistent with a trans influence of the thiolate donor weak-
ening the Fe-O bond. These findings were relevant to the
proposed mechanism for SOR, which relies upon Fe-O
bond cleavage of the (hydro)peroxo intermediate. However,
concrete structural information on the FeIII-OOR com-
plexes was lacking.
Herein we have used XAS to structurallycharacterize these
complexes. Iron K-edge X-ray absorption spectra have been
obtained for six different complexes, the alkylperoxo species
[FeIII([15]aneN4)(SC6H5)(OOtBu)]BF4 (1a), [FeIII([15]ane-
N4)(SC6H4-p-Cl)(OOtBu)]BF4 (2a), and [FeIII([15]aneN4)-
(SC6H4-p-NO2)(OOtBu)]BF4 (3a), and the iron(II) precursor
complexes [FeII([15]aneN4)(SC6H5)]BF4 (1), [FeII([15]-
aneN4)(SC6H4-p-Cl)]BF4 (2), and [FeII([15]aneN4)(SC6H4-
p-NO2)]BF4 (3). Examination of the X-ray absorption near-
edge spectroscopy (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption
fine structure (EXAFS) regions of the spectra has provided
detailed structural information on both the iron(II) and the
alkylperoxo-iron(III) complexes, including confirmation of
the thiolate ligation in both systems in solution. These studies
have also led to insights regarding the influence of the thiolate
donor on the structures of the alkylperoxo species. Compari-
son with the limited structural information on FeIII-OOR(H)
complexes aids in our understanding of the selection by
Nature of ligand type for the generation of peroxo-iron
species with particular properties. The reactivity of the
FeIII-OOR species toward electrophiles, nucleophiles, and
proton donors has also been examined. Kinetic studies on the
decay of the FeIII-OOR species suggest a reactivity pattern
controlled by the identity of the thiolate donor.
In our earlier work the FeIII-OOR model complexes were
generated at low temperature (-78 °C) and characterized by
UV-vis, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and reso-
nance Raman (RR) spectroscopies. On the basis of the
combined spectroscopic data, these species were formulated
as [FeIII([15]aneN4)(SC6H4-p-X)(OOR)]BF4 ([15]aneN4 =
1,4,8,12-tetraazacyclopentadecane; X = H, OMe, Cl, NO2
or a polyfluorinated substituent; R= t-butyl or cumenyl),
with a low-spin ferric center.25,26 These low-spin FeIII-OOR
complexes contained arylthiolate ligands of varying electron-
donating power, which allowed us to examine the influence
of the sulfur donor on the spectroscopic properties of an
FeIII-OOR species at parity of ligand environment. Re-
Experimental Section
General Procedures. All synthetic reactions were carried out
under an atmosphere of N2 or Ar using a drybox or standard
Schlenk techniques. Reagents were purchased from commercial
vendors and used without further purification unless noted
otherwise. Dichloromethane was purified via a Pure-Solv Sol-
vent Purification System from Innovative Technology, Inc.
All solvents were degassed by repeated cycles of freeze-
pump-thaw and then stored in a drybox. Tert-butylhydroper-
oxide was purchased from Aldrich as a ∼5.5 M solution in
decane over molecular sieves. The concentration of tBuOOH
was determined as previously described.26 Cumene hydroper-
oxide (CmOOH) was purchased from Aldrich as an 88% solution
in ether. The iron(II) complexes [FeII([15]aneN4)(SC6H5)]-
BF4 (1), [FeII([15]aneN4)(SC6H4-p-Cl)]BF4 (2), and [FeII([15]-
aneN4)(SC6H4-p-NO2)]BF4 (3) were synthesized according to
published procedures.26
(20) Karlsson, A.; Parales, J. V.; Parales, R. E.; Gibson, D. T.; Eklund,
H.; Ramaswamy, S. Science 2003, 299, 1039–1042.
(21) Shearer, J.; Scarrow, R. C.; Kovacs, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 11709–11717.
(22) Bukowski, M. R.; Zhu, S. R.; Koehntop, K. D.; Brennessel, W. W.;
Que, L., Jr. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 9, 39–48.
(23) Rohde, J. U.; Torelli, S.; Shan, X. P.; Lim, M. H.; Klinker, E. J.;
Kaizer, J.; Chen, K.; Nam, W. W.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
16750–16761.
(24) Shan, X.; Rohde, J. U.; Koehntop, K. D.; Zhou, Y.; Bukowski,
M. R.; Costas, M.; Fujisawa, K.; Que, L., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 8410–
8417.
Physical Methods. Low-temperature UV-visible spectra
were recorded at -78 °C or -40 °C (for kinetics) on a Cary 50
Bio spectrophotometer equipped with a fiber-optic coupler
(Varian) and a fiber-optic dip probe (Hellma 661.302-QX-UV,
(25) Krishnamurthy, D.; Kasper, G. D.; Namuswe, F.; Kerber, W. D.;
€
Sarjeant, A. A. N.; Moenne-Loccoz, P.; Goldberg, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 14222–14223.
(26) Namuswe, F.; Kasper, G. D.; Sarjeant, A. A. N.; Hayashi, T.; Krest,
(27) Namuswe, F.; Hayashi, T.; Jiang, Y. B.; Kasper, G. D.; Sarjeant,
€
€
C. M.; Green, M. T.; Moenne-Loccoz, P.; Goldberg, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
A. A. N.; Moenne-Loccoz, P.; Goldberg, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
2008, 130, 14189–14200.
157–167.