of their low volatility, nonflammability, capability to dissolve
various organic and inorganic compounds, and potentially
recyclable properties. Imidazolium-based ionic liquids are
most commonly used as these alternative solvents.4 In recent
years, phosphonium salt ionic liquids (PSILs) have been the
subject of some publications. They have higher thermal
stability than the nitrogen-based ILs. McNulty and co-
workers and others recently described several different
reactions in PSILs, and good to excellent results were
obtained.5 To our knowledge, there is only one publication
on the reductive carbonylation of nitrobenzene that was
carried out with imidazolium-based ionic liquids as cocata-
lysts and ethanol as the solvent.6
Table 1. Reductive Carbonylation of 2-Nitrotoluene with
Different Catalytic Systems in Various PSILsa
sel (%)
PSILb yieldc (%) (2a:2b)
entry
catalytic systems
1
2
PdCl2/Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy
PdCl2/Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy
PdCl2/Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy
PdCl2/Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy
Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy
PdCl2/2,2′-bipy
PdCl2/Phen
PdCl2/Phen
Ru3(CO)12/Phen
Ru3(CO)12
109
101
101
110
109
109
109
101
109
109
110
51
31
48
72
63
16
83
ND
69
36
92
82:18
47:53
81:19
58:42
84:16
100:0
96:4
3d
4d
5
Herein, we report our results on the highly reactive and
selective reductive carbonylation of mono- and dinitroarenes
to the corresponding mono- and diurethanes in good yields
and selectivities, using PdCl2/Phen (Phen: 1,10-phenanthro-
line) as the catalytic system and PSIL110 [C14H29
6e
7
8f
9
ND
87:13
68:32
100:0
(C6H13)3P+PF6 ] as the reaction medium.
-
10
11
We investigated the reductive carbonylation of nitroarenes
in PSILs with ruthenium and/or palladium transition-metal
catalysts. The reductive carbonylation of 2-nitrotoluene in
the presence of methanol was chosen as the model reaction,
and the reaction was effected under different conditions. The
results are presented in Table 1.
PdCl2/Phen
a Reaction conditions: 1 (2 mmol), cat. (0.1 mmol), ligand (0.2 mmol),
b
MeOH (30 mmol), 135 °C, 24 h. PSIL101: C14H29(C6H13)3P+Cl-.
PSIL109: C14H29(C6H13)3P+NTf2-. PSIL110: C14H29(C6H13)3P+ PF6
.
-
c Isolated yield. d CO (1000 psi), 150 °C. e Significant starting material
remained after 24 h. f ND ) Not determined, many products.
We first examined PdCl2/Ru3(CO)12/2,2′-bipy as the cata-
lytic system and ran the reactions in different PSILs in order
to determine the optimal phosphonium salt-based ionic liquid
for the reaction (Table 1, entries 1-4).7 We found that with
the PSILs as reaction media, the reaction could occur at lower
carbon monoxide pressure (500 psi) than that reported in a
number of other publications, but yields and selectivities were
moderate.
82:18 to 96:4. When the reaction was carried out in PSIL101
[C14H29(C6H13)3P+Cl-], the desired product was obtained in
trace quantities with nearly all of the starting material
recovered after 24 h (Table 1, entry 8). When Ru3(CO)12/
Phen or Ru3(CO)12 was used as the catalytic system, both
the yield and selectivity decreased (Table 1, entries 9 and
10). We were pleased to learn that when the reaction was
run in PSIL110 as the ionic liquid 2a was isolated in 92%
yield and no amine byproduct was detected (Table 1, entry
11).
According to the literature, palladium(II) with Phen is also
a very effective catalytic system for the reductive carbony-
lation of nitroarenes.8 Therefore, we ran the reaction in
In order to try to improve the reaction efficiency, the
reductive carbonylation of p-nitrotoluene 3 was carried out
PSIL109[C14H29(C6H13)3P+NTf2 ] with PdCl2/Phen as the
-
catalytic system (Table 1, entry 7). The product yield
increased from 51% to 83%, and selectivity increased from
Table 2. Reductive Carbonylation of p-Nitrotoluene Catalyzed
by PdCl2/Phen with Different Catalyst Loadings and CO
Pressuresa
(4) (a) Welton, T. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2004, 248, 2459. (b) Wilkes, J. S.
Green. Chem. 2002, 4, 73. (c) Dupont, J.; De Souza, R. F.; Suarez, P. A. Z.
Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3667. (d) Sheldon, R. A. Chem. Commun. 2001,
2399. (e) Wasserscheid, P.; Keim, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3772. (f) Earle, M. J.; Seddon, K. R. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1391. (g)
Welton, T. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 2071.
(5) (a) Cao, H.; McNamee, L.; Alper, H. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3530.
(b) McNulty, J.; Nair, J. J.; Robertson, A. J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4575. (c)
McNulty, J.; Cheekoori, S.; Bender, T. P.; Coggan, J. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 9, 1423. (d) McNulty, J.; Nair, J. J.; Cheekoori, S.; Larichev, V.;
Capretta, A.; Robertson, A. J. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 9314. (e) Vygodskii,
Y. S.; Shaplov, A. S.; Lozinskaya, E. I.; Filippov, O. A.; Shubina, E. S.;
Bandari, R.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 7821. (f)
McNulty, J.; Cheekoori, S.; Nair, J. J.; Larichev, V.; Capretta, A.; Robertson,
A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3641. (g) McNulty, J.; Capretta, A.;
Cheekoori, S.; Clyburne, J. A. C.; Robertson, A. J. Chim. Oggi 2004, 22,
13. (h) Gerritsma, D. A.; Robertson, A. J.; McNulty, J.; Capretta, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7629. (i) Ramani, A.; Earle, M. J.; Robertson,
A. J. PCT Int. Appl. 2003, 24. (j) McNulty, J.; Capretta, A.; Wilson, J.;
Dyck, J.; Adjabeng, G.; Robertson, A. J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1986. (k)
Karodia, N.; Guise, S.; Newlands, C.; Andersen, J.-A. Chem. Commun.
1998, 2341. (l) Kaufmann, D. E.; Nouroozian, M.; Henze, H. Synlett 1996,
1091.
cat. loading
(mol %)
pressure time
entry
solb
(psi)
(h)
yieldc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
5
5
2
2
1
5
IL110
IL110
IL110
IL110
IL110
benzene
500
200
200
200
200
200
24
24
48
24
24
48
96
93
91
92
89
9
a Reaction conditions: 3 (2 mmol), MeOH (30 mmol), 24 h. b PSIL110:
(6) Shi, F.; He, Y.; Li, D.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Deng, Y. J. Mol. Catal.
A: Chem. 2006, 244, 64.
C14H29 (C6H13)3P+ PF6-, 2.0 g. c Isolated yield.
(7) Valli, V. L. K.; Alper, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3778.
5080
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008