Scheme 1
.
Cyclization of Enynedioic Acid Derivative and
Subsequent Reactions
Figure 1. Products formed according to Scheme 1.
namically stable exo-alkoxycarbonyl group. The proposed
reaction course from 14 to 16 involves the iron-mediated
cyclization to form metallacycle 17, protonation to one of
its carbon-metal bonds, and Dieckmann condensation of 18
to 16. Proper choice of the proton source regarding its
reactivity and equivalents appeared critical for the efficient
conversion from 14 to 16, and we found that s-BuOH as
indicated in Scheme 2 attained a satisfactory and stable
product yield of 16 (50%).8,11-13
Figure 2 shows ketoesters prepared from various E,E-
dienedioates according to Scheme 2. The type of alcohol
portion of the starting esters did not affect the efficiency of
cyclization to give 19-21 in comparable yields. The yields
of 20 from the corresponding E,E- and Z,E-dienedioates (61
and 35%, respectively) show that the former is a more
preferable starting material than the latter. Differently
substituted ketoesters 16 and 22 and those having an oxa-
or aza-heterocycle 23 and 24 were produced in satisfactory
yields.
cyclization giving a single bicyclic compound 12 should be
also noted. Substituted cyclohexane 13 was similarly pro-
duced from the corresponding (E)- and (Z)-2-decen-8-
ynedioic acid derivatives in good yields, regardless of their
olefinic geometries.
When we attempted the cyclization of dienedioate 14 with
iron reagent 1 under the same conditions, the expected
cyclopentane 15 was not isolated after aqueous workup
(Scheme 2). Instead, the isolable product here was a bicyclic
ketoester 16 as a 1:1 mixture of tautomeric keto and enol
forms10 in varying yields between 17 and 32%. The ketoester
itself was a single isomer, which should have a thermody-
(3) For our recent work on iron-catalyzed addition of Grignard reagents
to dienoates and dienamides, see: (a) Fukuhara, K.; Urabe, H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 603–606. (b) Okada, S.; Arayama, K.; Murayama, R.;
Ishizuka, T.; Hara, K.; Hirone, N.; Hata, T.; Urabe, H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2008, 47, 6860–6864.
(4) The use of fewer equivalents of t-BuMgCl resulted in considerable
decrease in the product yield. It has been reported that FeCl2 and 4 equiv
of RCH2CH2MgX form a species of the formal composition of [Fe(MgX)2]n.
To the best of our knowledge, the use of t-BuMgCl for this purpose has
not been mentioned. (a) Bogdanovic´, B.; Schwickardi, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4610–4613. (b) Fu¨rstner, A.; Leitner, A.; Mendez, M.;
Krause, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13856–13863. (c) Fu¨rstner, A.;
Krause, H.; Lehmann, C. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 440–444.
(5) Even with the metal species listed in ref 1, cyclization of enynedioic
acid derivatives to the products such as those in Scheme 1 and Figure 1
has not been reported.
(6) Other iron-mediated cyclizations of enynes and dienes are as follows.
In these reports, R,ꢀ-unsaturated carboxylic acid derivatives are not included
as the starting material. For the Pauson-Khand-type enyne cyclization, see:
(a) Pearson, A. J.; Dubbert, R. A. Organometallics 1994, 13, 1656–1661.
For [2 + 2] cyclization and polymerization of dienes, see: (b) Bouwkamp,
M. W.; Bowman, A. C.; Lobkovsky, E.; Chirik, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 13340–13341. (c) Takeuchi, D.; Matsuura, R.; Park, S.; Osakada,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7002–7003. Cyclization of diynes initiated
by iron-catalyzed carbometalation was recently reported: (d) Zhang, D.;
Ready, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1505–1506.
In the transformation of Scheme 2, the carbon-metal bond
in 17 is cleaved by a proton, which is followed by the second
cyclization. However, this proton may be replaced by another
electrophile. In fact, when a ketone or aldehyde was added
(9) Products 6 and 7 consisted of only two diastereoisomers out of four.
These diastereoisomers should be attributable to the stereochemistry between
the cyclopentane carbon and the carbon R to the ester group as similarly
observed for 5. In these cases, the assignment of stereochemistries to major
and minor isomers has not been done.
(10) Ketoesters in Scheme 2, Figure 2, and eq 1 are always an
approximately 1:1 mixture of keto and enol forms, of which only the former
is depicted for simplicity.
(11) Bicyclic ketoester 16 is a known key compound to pentalenolactone
F: Cane, D. E.; Thomas, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5295–5303
.
(12) For reviews on the preparation and synthetic utility of five-
membered bicyclic compounds, see: Mehta, G.; Srikrishna, A. Chem. ReV.
1997, 97, 671–719. Singh, V.; Thomas, B. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3647–
3692
.
(7) Iron-catalyzed Diels-Alder and Alder-ene reactions are also known.
(a) Genet, J. P.; Ficini, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 1499–1502. (b) tom Dieck,
H.; Diercks, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 778–779. (c)
Baldenius, K.-U.; tom Dieck, H.; Ko¨nig, W. A.; Icheln, D.; Runge, T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 305–307. (d) Takacs, J. M.;
Anderson, L. G.; Madhavan, G. V. B.; Seely, F. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1987, 26, 1013–1015. (e) Takacs, J. M.; Anderson, L. G.; Newsome,
P. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2542–2544. (f) Fu¨rstner, A.; Majima,
K.; Martin, R.; Krause, H.; Kattnig, E.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1992–2004.
(13) Dimerization of cinnamate esters to ketoesters has been reported:
(a) Kise, N.; Iitaka, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Ueda, N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
8305–8315, and references cited therein. (b) Takaki, K.; Beppu, F.; Tanaka,
S.; Tsubaki, Y.; Jintoku, T.; Fujiwara, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.
1990, n/a, 516–517. (c) Jensen, S. R.; Kristiansen, A.-M.; Munch-Petersen,
J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1970, 24, 2641–2647. For intramolecular cyclization
of R,ꢀ-olefinic esters, see: (d) Shinohara, I.; Okue, M.; Yamada, Y.;
Nagaoka, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 4649–4652. However, these
methods did not realize the concomitant incorporation of a second
constituent such as a carbonyl compound to the products as can be seen in
(8) For experimental details, see the Supporting Information.
27-30.
5032
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008