Communications
for most processes, in certain cases, the related NHC–AgI
the sp2-hybridized carbon-based substituents of aluminum-
based reagents is significantly more facile than of those that
are sp3-hybridized.[9g] Accordingly, as illustrated in Table 4,
treatment of phenyllithium with one equivalent of commer-
cially available Me2AlCl in pentane (À78 to 228C, 12 h)
affords a solution of Me2PhAl containing LiCl, which can be
used directly—without filtration or purification—in copper-
catalyzed ACA reactions of b-substituted cyclic enones (e.g.,
cyclopentenone 6c and cyclohexenone 8a).
Due to the substantially different nature of the aluminum-
based reagent derived from phenyllithium (vs. trialkyl alumi-
num compounds),[3g] we decided to probe the ability of copper
complexes derived from 1–5 in promoting the addition of the
in situ generated reagent to 6c and 8a. As the results
summarized in Table 4 indicate, reactions performed at 228C
in the presence of 2.5 mol% NHC–AgI complex 2 (entries 2
and 7, Table 4) furnish the highest degrees of asymmetric
induction. When the catalytic ACA is carried out at À508C
(48 h; see entry 1, Table 5), 12c is obtained in 66% yield and
72% ee (86:14 e.r.).
complexes 3 and 4 deliver higher selectivity; such differences
are, however, not significant (not more than 10% ee). 2) In
some instances, ACA reactions proceed faster and deliver
slightly higher enantioselectivity when performed at rela-
tively elevated temperatures; the processes in entries 1 and 5
of Table 3 are notable in this regard. For example, ACA of b-
substituted cycloheptenone 9a (entry 5, Table 3) proceeds to
greater than 98% conversion at 228C within fifteen minutes
to afford the desired product in 89% ee (94.5:5.5 e.r.),
whereas at À788C, 12 h is required and the desired product is
obtained in 85% ee (92.5:7.5 e.r.). 3) In the reaction shown in
entry 1 of Table 3, involving iBu3Al and performed at 228C,
significant amounts of the [1,2]-hydride addition product (10–
15%) is isolated when Cu(OTf)2 is used. When CuCl2·2H2O is
used instead, the aforementioned byproduct is not observed
(less than 2% by 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis), while 10a
is generated with the same selectivity as obtained with
Cu(OTf)2. It should be noted that for reactions carried out at
À788C, use of CuCl2·2H2O (along with a chiral NHC) leads to
less than 10% conversion.
Next, we turned our attention towards developing a
procedure for catalytic ACA of aryl-based aluminum
reagents. Since only one triaryl aluminum compound[12] is
commercially available (Ph3Al), and use of such reagents
would not be particularly atom-economical, an alternative
procedure that provides access to a wider range of aryl metal
reagents is required. To address this problem, as shown in
Table 4, we envisioned that reaction of a readily accessible
aryl lithium reagent with a commercially available and
inexpensive dialkyl aluminum halide, such as Me2AlCl,
could lead to the formation of the corresponding dialkyl
aryl aluminum species.[13] It is well-established that transfer of
As the additional data summarized in Table 5 illustrate,
catalytic ACA with aryl aluminum reagents, generated in situ,
Table 5: Copper-catalyzed ACA of aryl aluminum reagents to b-substi-
tuted cyclic enones.[a]
Entry Substrate Ar
T
t
Yield
e.r.[c]
ee
[8C] [h] [%][b]
[%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
6c
6c
6c
6c
8a
8a
8a
8a
8a
C6H5
oMeC6H4
À50 48 66
À15 48 85
86:14
99:1
85.5:14.5 71
97.5:2.5 95
95:5
98:2
92:8
93:7
88:12
72
98
pOMeC6H4 À50 48 67
oOMeC6H4 À15 48 55
Table 4: Synthesis and in situ use of aryl aluminum reagents in copper-
catalyzed ACA.[a]
C6H5
À30 36 71
90
96
84
86
83
oMeC6H4
+4 42 49
pOMeC6H4 À50 36 61
pCF3C6H4 À30 36 52
oOMeC6H4 +4 48 60
[a–c] See Table 2. [c] Determined by chiral GLC or HPLC analysis (see the
Supporting Information for additional details).
can be performed on five- as well as six-membered b-
substituted cyclic enones, affording the desired products in up
to 98% ee (entry 2, Table 5). Examination of the findings
depicted in Table 5 indicates that aryl lithium species bearing
electron-donating (e.g., entries 3, 4, 7 and 9, Table 5) and
electron-withdrawing (entry 8, Table 5) substituents can be
used effectively.[14] Enantioselectivities appear to be highest,
however, when the aryl unit is sterically more encumbered
(i.e., carries an ortho group: entries 2, 4, and 6, Table 5). Two
additional points are noteworthy: 1) All aryl lithium reagents
(except for commercially available PhLi) were easily obtained
by treatment of commercially available aryl bromides with
nBuLi.[15] 2) Not only can the aryl aluminum reagents be used
Entry NHC–AgI Substrate Conversion [%][b] e.r.[c]
ee [%][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6c
6c
6c
6c
6c
8a
8a
8a
8a
8a
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
>98
68.5:31.5
73.5:26.5
50:50
34:66
46.5:53.5
64:36
89:11
38:62
26:74
42.5:57.5 À15
37
47
<2
À32
À7
28
78
À24
À48
[a–c] See Table 1. Three equivalents of the aluminum-based reagent were
used.
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7358 –7362