34
E. Sun et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 889 (2008) 28–34
Table 3
of para-alkylamideyl group on the phenyl group has little
effect on porphyrin properties. The UVꢀvis spectra, infra-
red spectra, Resonance Raman spectra, fluorescence spec-
tra and cyclic voltammograms are almost identical.
According to thermal studies, porphyrin ligand and Mn
complex are stable up to nearly 300 °C, and the decompo-
sition of the compounds is a continuous process. The fluo-
rescent emission peaks of porphyrin ligands are red shift
compared to TPP. The quantum yields are in the range
of 0.019ꢀ0.057. The potentials of porphyrin ligands shift
cathodically compared to TPP due to the electron-donating
group at para position of the four phenyl groups. The cyc-
lic voltammetry of Mn complexes is different from the por-
phyrin ligand, which shows not only the redox of the
porphyrin ring, but also the redox of the metal ion Mn
(III)/Mn (II).
Cyclic voltammetry data of porphyrin ligands and Mn complexes
Compounds
Ered1/V
Ered2/V
TPP
8L
10L
12L
14L
ꢀ1.27
ꢀ1.49
ꢀ1.51
ꢀ1.50
ꢀ1.50
ꢀ1.51
ꢀ0.65
ꢀ0.66
ꢀ0.67
ꢀ0.67
ꢀ0.67
ꢀ0.66
ꢀ1.73
ꢀ1.94
ꢀ1.96
ꢀ1.96
ꢀ1.96
—
ꢀ1.77
ꢀ1.78
ꢀ1.78
ꢀ1.77
ꢀ1.78
ꢀ1.76
16L
8Mn
10Mn
12Mn
14Mn
16Mn
18Mn
attachment of an electron-donating group at para position
of the four phenyl groups. The half-wave potentials would
shift in a manner predicted by the Hammett linear free
energy relationship DE1/2 = 4rq [27], where r is the total
polar substituent constant which is dependent on the kind
and position of the four substituents, and q is the reaction
constant which is given in volts and expresses the suscepti-
bility of the electrode reaction to the total polar effect of the
substituents. Its value depends on the kind of electroactive
group and the composition of the solvent and supporting
electrolyte, as well as the temperature.
References
[1] E.D. Sternberg, D. Dolphin, C. Bruckner, Tetrahedron 54 (1998)
4151.
[2] R.K. Lammi, A. Ambroise, T. Balasubramanian, R.W. Wagner, D.F.
Bocian, D. Holten, J.S. Lindsey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (2000) 7579.
[3] C.A. Mirkin, M.A. Ratner, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 43 (1992) 719.
[4] F. Remacle, S. Speiser, R.D. Levine, J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001)
5589.
[5] P.G. Van Patten, A.P. Shreve, J.S. Lindsey, R.J. Donohoe, J. Phys.
Chem. B 102 (1998) 4209.
The cyclic voltammogram of 8Mn obtained in DMF is
different from the ligand. Two reduction waves are
obtained, the first at ꢀ0.65 V corresponds to the reaction
Mn (III)/Mn (II), and the second occurs at ꢀ1.77 V and
can be assigned as formation of the anion radical [28].
The peak separation of the reduction Mn (III)/Mn (II) is
much larger than that of the reduction of porphyrin ring.
This phenomenon could be due to the coordination of
Mn porphyrin. The removal of the coordination ion during
reduction should result a lower rate constant. As listed in
Table 3, there are similar results for the samples whose cen-
tral ions are identical except 16L and 18L because they are
not soluble well in DMF. Comparing the cyclic voltammet-
ric results of porphyrin ligands and Mn complexes, it is
found that the redox potentials are almost identical when
the length of side chains increased. This is probably due
to the substituent constants of the alkylamido groups are
almost identical and the size of porphyrin has little effect
on the redox potentials.
[6] R.H. Jin, Chem. Commun. (2002) 198.
[7] J.W. Goodby, P.S. Robinson, B.K. Teo, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 56
(1980) 303.
[8] Y. Shimizu, A. Ishikawa, S. Kusabayashi, Chem. Lett. (1986) 1041.
[9] B.A. Gregg, M.A. Fox, A.J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111 (1989)
3024.
[10] R.P. Bimal, S.S. Kenneth, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 11802.
[11] W. Liu, Y.H. Shi, T.S. Shi, Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 20 (2004) 20.
[12] H.J. Eichhorn, J. Porphyrins, Phthalocyanines 4 (2000) 88.
[13] J.Z. Li, H. Xin, M. Li, Liq. Cryst. 33 (2006) 913.
[14] R.L. Hill, M. Goutermann, A. Ulman, Inorg.Chem. 21 (1982) 1450.
[15] D.J. Quimby, F.R. Longo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97 (1975) 5111.
[16] W.J. Kruper, T.A. Chamberlin, M. Kochanny, J. Org. Chem. 54
(1989) 2753.
[17] X.M. Guo, T.S. Shi, J. Mol. Struct. 789 (2006) 8.
[18] D.W. Thomas, A.E. Martell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 78 (1956) 1338.
[19] I.K. Choi, Y. Liu, Z. Wei, M.D. Ryan, Inorg. Chem. 36 (1997)
3113.
[20] W. Liu, Y.H. Shi, T.S. Shi, Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 24 (2003) 200.
[21] G.S.S. Saini, Spectrochimica. Acta. Part A 64 (2006) 981.
[22] X.Y. Li, R.S. Czernuszewicz, J.R. Kincaid, Y.O. Su, T.G. Spiro, J.
Phys. Chem. 94 (1) (1990) 31.
[23] F. Paulat, V.K.K. Praneeth, C. Nather, N. Lehnert, Inorg. Chem. 45
(2006) 2835.
4. Conclusion
[24] M.J. Gouterman, Mol. Spectrosc. 6 (1961) 138.
[25] A. Harriman, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday. Trans. I 77 (1981) 369.
[26] Z.F. Li, S.W. Wang, J.X. Wang, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 19 (2003) 691.
[27] K.M. Kadish, M.M. Morrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 3326.
[28] S.L. Kelly, K.M. Kadish, Inorg. Chem. 21 (1982) 3631.
The above experimental results indicate that only the
ligands with long chains of more than 12 carbon atoms
are mesogeic while the Mn complexes are not. The length