A R T I C L E S
Zhao et al.
mass spectra were measured on an IonSpec FT-ICR mass spec-
trometer. Fluorescence spectra were recorded on LPS-220B fluo-
rescence spectrometer (Photon Technology International) with lamp
power supply at 25 °C.
Furthermore, the network resistance of the pyrenecyclodex-
trin-SWNT/FET device in the presence of ADA-Ru was also
measured by turning on and off of the LED (I ) 40 W m-2 and
λ ) 490 nm). When the light is on, the sheet resistance (Figure
3b) decreases and stays low position until the removal of the
light. The photoresponse is almost recoverable after removal
of the light, indicating the recovery of the CT. The resistance
responds to the turning on and off of the LED more slowly, as
compared to that of the pyrenecyclodextrin-SWNT/FET device.
The data in the decrease region were enlarged and shown to fit
well to an exponential equation, producing a time constant of
65.0 s. This long time constant, measured from the resistance,
may not reflect19 the CT dynamics from the pyrenecyclodextrin-
SWNTs to the ADA-Ru guests, simply because of the fact
that the charge reconfiguration over the entire network lasts until
it reaches an equilibrium state.
SWNT/FET. The FET device was fabricated using CVD-grown
SWNT networks as the channels on silicon wafers with a 500 nm
thick silicon dioxide (SiO2) dielectric.12 The density of the network
was chosen to be 1.5 tubes µm-2, just above the percolation
threshold to avoid too many conduction paths through the metallic
SWNTs, a situation that would reduce the ON/OFF ratio of the
transistor characteristics. The lift-off lithography process was used
to pattern the e-beam deposited Pd contact pads on top of the
SWNTs network. Oxygen plasma was used to etch away the
SWNTs outside the source-drain channels. Because the channel is
200 µm long and 1000 µm wide, approximately 100 times longer
than the SWNTs, the network resistance, rather than the contact
resistance between Pd and network, dominates the overall resistance.
During the sensing process, three independent measurement experi-
ments were performed to afford self-consistent parameters, the
changes of the threshold voltages and the resistances, and give the
averaged values.
Conclusion
We have demonstrated that the pyrenecyclodextrin-SWNT/
FET device can serve as a tunable photosensor for sensing a
luminescent Ru complex, backed up by fluorescent spectroscopic
experiments in solution. When the light is on (I ) 40 W m-2
and λ ) 280 nm), the transfer curve of the pyrenecyclodextrin-
SWNT/FET device shifts toward a negative gate voltage by
about 1.6 V and its sheet resistance increases quickly, indicating
a CT process from the pyrenecyclodextrins to the SWNTs. In
contrast, the transfer curve of the pyrenecyclodextrin-SWNT/
FET device in the presence of the ADA-Ru guest shifts toward
a positive gate voltage by about 1.9 V and its sheet resistance
decreases slowly when the light is on (I ) 40 W m-2 and λ )
490 nm), showing a CT process from the pyrenecyclodextrin-
SWNT hybrids to the ADA-Ru guests. These photoresponse
processes are recoverable after removal of the light. The results
reveal the SWNT/FET sensing devices can be tailored to meet
specific needs using rationally designed approaches to analyte
sensing. They raise the prospect of promising applications in
the area of tunable light detection, as in artificial eyes and PVDs.
5: A mixture of 4-(2-hydroxyethoxy)benzaldehyde 3 (1.16 g, 7.0
mmol), 1-adamantaneacetic acid 4 (1.27 g, 6.5 mmol), DCC (1.44
g, 7.0 mmol), and DMAP (10.0 mg, 0.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL)
was stirred for 5 h at room temperature in an atmosphere of Ar.
The resulting suspension was filtered, the filtrate was evaporated,
and the residue was subjected to column chromatography (SiO2,
CH2Cl2 eluent) to give compound 5 (1.46 g, 65%) as a colorless
1
solid. H NMR (500 MHz, CD2Cl2, 25 °C, TMS): δ 1.64-1.72
(m, 12H, ADA-H), 1.95-1.97 (m, 3H, ADA-H), 2.13 (s, 2H,
CO-CH2-ADA), 4.29-4.31 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.45-4.47 (m, 2H,
OCH2), 7.05-7.07 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.86-7.88 (d, J )
8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 9.91 (s, 1H, CHO). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CD2Cl2, 25 °C): δ 28.6, 30.4, 32.6, 36.5, 42.1, 48.6, 61.6, 66.2,
114.6, 130.2, 131.6, 163.3, 171.1, 190.3.
8: 1,10-Phenanthroline-5,6-dione 7 (0.80 g, 4.2 mmol) and
ammonium acetate (5.86 g, 133 mmol) were dissolved in hot glacial
MeCO2H (10 mL). While the mixture was stirred, a solution of 5
(1.43 g, 4.2 mmol) in glacial MeCO2H (10 mL) was added dropwise
to the mixture. The mixture was heated at 90 °C for 3 h and was
then poured into H2O (200 mL). The solution was neutralized with
ammonia to pH 7, before being cooled to room temperature. The
precipitate was filtered off and washed with large portions of H2O.
The product was dried to afford compound 8 (1.38 g, 62%) as a
Experimental Section
General. All reagents, including ꢀ-CD, 1-adamantaneacetic acid
(4), ruthenium(III) chloride hydrate, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (1),
and 1,10-phenanthroline (6), are commercially available and were
used without further purification. SWNTs were purchased from
Carbon Solutions Inc. and used without further purification. 4-(2-
Hydroxyethoxy)benzaldehyde (3), 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione
(7), and (1,10-phenanthro-line)2RuCl2 (9) were prepared as de-
scribed previously.20-22 Pyrenecyclodextrin and pyrenecyclodex-
trin-decorated SWNT hybrids were synthesized according to our
previous report.9 Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were
recorded on Bru¨ker Avance 500 and 600 spectrometers at 25 °C.
Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) downfield
from the Me4Si resonance, which was used as the internal standard
1
dark red solid. H NMR (500 MHz, (CD3)2SO, 25 °C, TMS): δ
1.46-1.56 (m, 12H, ADA-H), 1.85-1.87 (m, 3H, ADA-H), 2.04
(s, 2H, CO-CH2-ADA), 4.21-4.26 (m, 2H, OCH2), 4.33-4.37
(m, 2H, OCH2), 7.13-7.14 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 7.81-7.86
(m, 2H, Ar-H), 8.17-8.19 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.85-8.87
(d, J ) 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar-H), 8.97-8.98 (d, J ) 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar-H),
13.5 (s, NH). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD2Cl2, 25 °C): δ 28.5, 32.8,
36.7, 43.2, 48.7, 62.1, 66.2, 112.5, 114.8, 121.6, 122.9, 124.3, 125.4,
126.6, 130.0, 132.5, 135.3, 150.1, 153.1, 154.4, 159.7.
ADA-Ru: 8 (0.15 g, 0.3 mmol) and 9 (0.15 g, 0.3 mmol) were
dissolved in absolute EtOH (100 mL). The solution was heated
under reflux for 6 h and was then filtered to remove unreacted
starting materials. The filtrate was concentrated under vacuum and
then poured into Et2O (30 mL). The solution was filtered, and the
obtained solid was washed with Et2O. The product was dried to
1
when recording H NMR spectra. Electrospray ionization (ESI)
(19) (a) Star, A.; Lu, Y.; Bradley, K.; Gru¨ner, G. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 1587–
1591. (b) Robel, I.; Bunker, B. A.; Kamat, P. V. AdV. Mater. 2005,
17, 2458–2463.
1
give compound (0.21 g, 71%) as a magenta solid. H NMR (500
MHz, D2O, 25 °C, TMS): δ 1.31-1.43 (m, 12H, ADA-H),
1.67-1.69 (m, 3H, ADA-H), 1.91 (s, 2H, CO-CH2-ADA),
4.26-4.34 (m, 4H, OCH2CH2O), 7.32-7.34 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H,
Ar-H), 7.54-7.66 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 7.94-8.04 (m, 6H, Ar-H),
8.20-8.28 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 8.50-8.62 (m, 6H, Ar-H). MS (ESI):
(20) (a) Mao, P. C.-M.; Mouscadet, J.-F.; Leh, H.; Auclair, C.; Hsu, L.-Y.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50, 1634–1637. (b) Meng, F.; Hua, J.; Chen,
K.; Tian, H.; Zuppiroli, L.; Nu¨esch, F. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15,
979–986.
(21) (a) Hiort, C.; Lincoln, P.; Norden, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
3448–3454. (b) Lenaerts, P.; Storms, A.; Mullens, J.; D’Haen, J.;
Go¨rller-Walrand, C.; Binnemans, K.; Driesen, K. Chem. Mater. 2005,
17, 5194–5201.
(22) Sullivan, B. P.; Salmon, D. J.; Meyer, T. J. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17,
3334–3341.
m/z ) 496.7 [M - 2Cl]2+
.
Acknowledgment. We thank Professor Jeffrey I. Zink in
UCLA for the valuable discussion regarding the charge-transfer.
9
17002 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 50, 2008