C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
generated in the presence of AgOTf can efficiently mediate the
formation of 2 when halide delivery is avoided (Figure 1).
substrates to diarylmethanes is a more critical process, normally
accompanied by variable degrees of halohydrin formation. Accord-
ing to this, the rearrangement of 3c-d leading to 5c-d is a more
stringent test for possible mediators. With substrate 3c (entries
8-11), it becomes clear that the ability of the four Lewis acids to
induce the rearrangement varies in the order BF3 ·Et2O > FeBr3/
3AgOTf > AuCl3/3AgOTf > FeBr3. When the yield of the
diarylmethane 5 is considered, the FeBr3/3AgOTf reagent represents
an optimal compromise (entry 11). The same trends are observed
for the conversion of 3d into 5d.
In summary, the results reported here clearly show that the
cyclization and rearrangement reactions of aryl and benzyl glycidyl
ethers are Lewis acid mediated processes. While the FeBr3/3AgOTf
combination appears as the catalyst of choice for this set of
processes, the cationic species presumably formed through the
interaction of AuCl3 with AgOTf is also able to mediate, albeit in
a less efficient manner, the same reactions. From a mechanistic
point of view, the observed reactivity trends clearly indicate that
these cyclizations are of the Friedel-Crafts type.
From the perspective of practical use, cost and availability
considerations11 make iron bromide a most attractive alternative
for these reactions and, in general, for processes where gold and
other expensive metals merely act as Lewis acids.
Figure 1. Reaction pathways of aryl glycidyl ethers with Lewis acids.
Once the ability of Lewis acids to induce the cyclization of aryl
glycidyl ethers 1 into 3-chromanols 2 had been established, we
turned our attention toward benzyl glycidyl ethers 3, with the goal
of determining whether the FeBr3, FeBr3/3AgOTf, and AuCl3/
3AgOTf catalysts could also induce the reactions5 shown in Table
2. Substrates 3a-b were selected as precursors of tetrahydroben-
Table 2. Lewis Acid Mediated Cyclization/Rearrangement of
Benzyl Glycidyl Ethers 3 to Tetrahydrobenzo[c]oxepin-4-ols 4 or to
4-Diarylmethyl-1,3-dioxolanes 5
Acknowledgment. This paper is dedicated to Professor Josep
Font on the occasion of his 70th birthday. This work was funded
by MEC (Grant CTQ2005-02193/BQU), DIUE (Grant 2005SGR225),
Consolider Ingenio 2010 (Grant CSD2006-0003), and ICIQ Foun-
dation. R.M. is also indebted to MEC for a fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
product characterizations. This material is available free of charge via
References
entry
substrate
product
conditionsa
yield [%]
(1) (a) Gao, Y.; Hanson, R. M.; Klunder, J. M.; Ko, S. Y.; Masamune, H.;
Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765–5780. For a review
see: (b) Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S. Org. React. 1996, 48, 1–299.
(2) Aziridines and Epoxides in Organic Synthesis; Yudin, A. K., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
(3) Recent work: (a) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 550–556. (b) Bandini, M.; Melloni, A.; Tommasi,
S.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Synlett 2005, 1199–1222. (c) Smith, B. M.; Skellam,
E. J.; Oxley, S. J.; Gram, A. E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 1979–1982.
(d) Pulipaka, A. B.; Bergmeier, S. C. Synthesis 2008, 1420–1430. (e) Liu,
Y.; Li, X.; Lin, G.; Xiang, Z.; Xiang, J.; Zhao, M.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4625–4629.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
3a
3a
3a
3a
3b
3b
3b
3c
3c
3c
3c
3d
3d
4a
4a
4a
4a
4b
4b
4b
5c
5c
5c
5c
5d
5d
A
B
C
D
B
C
D
Ab
B
C
D
C
D
80
82
70
88
75
74
81
59
25c
72
82
89
96
9
10
11
12
13
(4) Shi, Z.; He, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5964–5965.
(5) Islas-Gonza´lez, G.; Benet-Buchholz, J.; Maestro, M. A.; Riera, A.; Perica`s,
M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1537–1544.
(6) Kharasch, M. S.; Isbell, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 53, 3053–3059.
(7) For the use of FeBr3 in aza-Prins cyclizations, see: Carballo, R. M.; Ram´ırez,
M. A.; Rodr´ıguez, M. L.; Mart´ın, V. S.; Padro´n, J. I. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
3837–3840.
(8) InBr3: (a) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Melchiorre, P.; Umani-Ronchi, A. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 5386–5389. SnCl4: (b) Taylor, S. K.; Hockermann,
G. L.; Karrick, G. L.; Lyle, S. B.; Schramm, S. B. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
2449. (c) Taylor, S. K.; Davisson, M. E.; Hissom, B. R., Jr.; Brown, S. L.;
Pristach, H. A.; Schramm, S. B.; Harvey, S. M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52,
425–429. Metal perchlorates: (d) Chini, M.; Crotti, P.; Flippin, L. A.;
Macchia, F. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4525–4562. For reviews, see: (e)
Lewis Acids in Organic Synthesis; Yamamoto, H., Ed.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2006.
a Cond. A: BF3 ·Et2O (30 mol%), CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 15 min. Cond. B:
FeBr3 (10 mol%), CH2Cl2, 20 °C, 60 min. Cond. C: AuCl3/3AgOTf (2.5
mol%), ClCH2CH2Cl, 50 °C, 4 h. Cond. D: FeBr3/3AgOTf (20 mol%),
CH2Cl2, 20 °C, 30 min. b Reaction at -35 °C for 5 min. c 29% of the
corresponding bromohydrin was also obtained. Reaction time was 90 min.
zo[c]oxepin-4-ols 4a-b via ortho activation of the benzyl sub-
stituent, while 3c-d were chosen as precursors to 4-diarylmethyl-
1,3-dioxolanes 5 via ipso activation of the benzyl fragment. The
results of the study have been summarized in Table 2 along with
those obtained with BF3 ·Et2O, when available.5
(9) For the formation of fluorohydrins from epoxyethers with BF3 · Et2O, see:
Islas-Gonza´lez, G.; Puigjaner, C.; Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Riera,
A.; Perica`s, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6337–6341.
When the stereospecific cyclization of 3a is considered (entries
1-4), it becomes clear that Au(III) is also able to induce conversion
into 4a, although FeBr3/3AgOTf and the other tested Lewis acids
are more efficient mediators than AuCl3/3AgOTf for this process.
The less reactive 3b displayed similar behavior.
While the cyclization of substrates 3 bearing an ortho-activated
benzyl substituent to oxepinols 4 is normally very clean,5 the
corresponding Lewis acid induced rearrangement of ipso-activated
(10) The FeBr3/3AgOTf and AuCl3/3AgOTf catalytic systems have also been
tested in the stereospecific and regioselective intermolecular addition of
1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene to (2S,3S)-3-phenylglycidyl methyl ether. The
former gave the desired product 7 in 60% yield, whereas the latter was
less active (ca. 40%; see SI for details). Further studies concerning related
intermolecular addition are in course.
(11) For recent reviews, see: (a) Enthaler, S.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3317–3321. (b) Correa, A.; Garc´ıa-Mancheno,
O.; Bolm, C. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 1108–1117.
JA8062887
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 50, 2008 16839