Communications
thiols (-SH) (traces b–d in Figure 2D), which affect the PTP sen-
sitivity to Ca2+ and trigger pore opening: (i) matrix -SH groups
that react with diamide and phenylarsine oxide (PhAsO),[23]
(ii) inner membrane external thiols that react with copper(II)
bis(1,10-phenanthroline) complex [Cu(OP)2], and (iii) outer
membrane N-ethylmaleimide (NEM)-reactive thiols.[24–25] In all
cases, the PTP transition from the closed to open conformation
was delayed by 3.12 mm CsA (traces c in Figure 2D) and pro-
hibited by the same concentration of 4 (traces d in Figure 2D),
as assessed in mitochondrial swelling assays (Figure 2D).
Therefore, these inhibitors are effective in preventing PTP
opening regardless of the methods used to induce it.
strated moderate plasma stability and very high plasma pro-
tein binding. A parallel artificial membrane permeability assay
(PAMPA) was used as an in vitro model for passive transport,
and blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability was used to predict
central nervous system (CNS) penetration. Compounds 3 and 4
demonstrated very good permeability in both of these assays.
Metabolic liability was apparent for both 3 and 4 after 1 h ex-
posure, especially in mouse liver microsomes in the presence
of NADPH. The key analogues showed some degree of toxicity
towards Fa2N-4 immortalized human hepatocytes, having LC50
values of 30 and 32 mm with 75-fold and 114-fold selectivity
compared to the EC50 values for the mitochondrial swelling for
3 and 4, respectively. Activity of these key analogues in the
Rh123 uptake and cytotoxicity assays suggests a possible
trend, which will be monitored during future studies.
In all the above-mentioned studies, murine mitochondria
were used for identifying and optimizing PTP inhibitors. How-
ever, due to the existence of species-specific PTP regula-
tion,[26–28] we deemed it essential to test whether an inhibitory
effect could be also detected in human mitochondria. As dem-
onstrated in Figure 2E, compound 4 induced a concentration-
dependent increase in the CRC of permeabilized HeLa cells.
It has been suggested that the PTP forms from a unique
conformation of dimers (or higher oligomeric forms) of F-ATP
synthase.[5] In light of these findings, we investigated whether
4 also affects ATP synthesis, which would be potentially an un-
desirable side effect. Mitochondrial respiration was measured
both in isolated mouse liver mitochondria and in intact HeLa
cells in the presence or absence of 4. No significant differences
were observed in respiratory control ratios, FCCP-stimulated,
and oligomycin-sensitive respiration in either isolated mouse
liver mitochondria (Figure 2C and data not shown) or HeLa
cells (Figure 2F) at low concentrations of 4 (i.e., ꢁ10 mm). A
decrease in the IMM potential (Figure 2A) and respiratory con-
trol ratio (Figure 2C) in isolated mouse liver mitochondria (re-
flecting a decreased ability to generate ATP) and of oxygen-
consumption rate in HeLa cells was observed only at higher
concentrations of 4. These findings confirm that compound 4
shows no effect on ATP synthesis and HeLa cell proliferation at
low concentrations (5 mm and ꢁ10 mm, respectively). However,
at concentrations above 10 mm, it might cause cellular toxicity,
as confirmed in HeLa (Figure 2G) and Fa2N-4 cells (last entry in
Table 2).
In summary, SAR optimization studies around the N-phenyl-
benzamide scaffold led to the discovery of potent inhibitors of
the PTP conferring mitochondria with a very high CRC, which
is a robust measure of inhibition of the PTP. Compound 4 con-
fers a CRC ratio of 19 (the highest reported for a PTP inhibitor
to date) and showed promising inhibition of swelling, with an
EC50 value of 280 nm. We carried out biological characterization
of the PTP through a series of in vitro assays and found that
compound 4 was protective against both Ca2+- and oxidative-
stress-triggered pore opening, and that it inhibits both the
mouse and human PTP. Moreover, we found that the biological
target for this compound series is not CyPD, and that no inhib-
ition of F-ATP synthase is observed at concentrations that fully
inhibit the PTP. Higher concentration (>10 mm) of compound 4
showed interference with the IMM potential and cytotoxicity.
Overall, this compound series, represented by compounds 3
and 4, possesses a promising in vitro pharmacological profile,
poor-to-good aqueous solubility (pH-dependent), and good
permeability. Future studies will involve additional optimization
in order to decrease compound toxicity and provide analogues
suitable for in vivo testing for efficacy in relevant disease
models.
Acknowledgements
We next examined the physicochemical and in vitro pharma-
cokinetic properties of analogues 3 and 4 (Figure 1 and
Table 2). Analogues 3 and 4 displayed promising physicochem-
ical parameters, possessing a desirable number of hydrogen-
bond donors and acceptors, decreased topological polar sur-
face area, a molecular weight of less than 500 Da and moder-
ately favorable ligand efficiency. Although the cLogP values
were generally high for 3 and 4 (above 6), analogues 14 and
15 had much decreased cLogP values around 4.9.
These key analogues were characterized further for in vitro
pharmacology to create a baseline profile for future structure–
property relationship (SPR) optimization efforts. Overall, ana-
logues 3 and 4 demonstrated poor-to-very-good in vitro phar-
macokinetic features, having poor-to-good aqueous solubility
(pH-dependent) and good chemical stability in the presence of
excess dithiothreitol (DTT), confirming that these inhibitors do
not possess reactive functionality. Compounds 3 and 4 demon-
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the US Nation-
al Institutes of Health (NIH) and Telethon–Italy. Chemistry efforts
at the University of Kansas Specialized Chemistry Centerwere sup-
ported by NIH grant U54HG005031awarded to J. AubØ. Support
for the University of Kansas NMR instrumentation was provided
by an NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant (S10RR024664) and
a US National Science Foundation (NSF) Major Research Instru-
mentation Grant (0320648). The authors thank Patrick Porubsky
(University of Kansas) for compound management, and for aque-
ous and chemical stability data. Initial assay validation, high-
throughput screening, and hit confirmation efforts at the Conrad
Prebys Center for Chemical Genomics were supported by NIH
grant U54HG005033 awarded to J.C. Reed. Funding for the bio-
logical assays was supported by NIH grants R03A033978 award-
ed to M. Forte, P. Bernardi and U54HG005031-05S1 awarded to J.
AubØ, and by Telethon–Italy grant GGP14037 to P. Bernardi.
ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 283 – 288
287
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim