The scope of this chemistry has subsequently been
examined toward the synthesis of several natural products.8
Rapid access to varied 2-substituted dihydrofuranones 3
would be facilitated by late-stage diversification of the
unsaturation in a rearrangement precursor 1 and would also
allow a straightforward analysis of the effect of alkene
substitution on the rearrangement chemistry. Herein, we
describe one-pot alkene cross-metathesis/oxonium ylide
formation and highly diastereoselective [2,3] sigmatropic
rearrangement to access dihydrofuranones and application
of the methodology in a synthesis of hyperolactone C.
First, we examined the viability of allylic ether functional-
ity to undergo cross-metathesis in the presence of a tethered
diazocarbonyl group. Cross-metathesis of R-diazo-ꢀ-ketoester
45,9 with olefins (5-10 equiv) was carried out using Grubbs
II catalyst (5 mol %) in CH2Cl2 at reflux for 14-18 h (Table
1). The substituted alkenes 5 were obtained in moderate to
excellent yields and generally with high stereoselectivity.
Cross-metathesis with 2-methyl-2-butene proceeded smoothly
to give the prenyl ether in excellent yield (entry 1).
Vinylcyclohexane underwent efficient cross-metathesis (89%),
but the sterically hindered 3,3-dimethyl-1-butene gave only
50% cross-metathesis (entries 2 and 3). Styrene and substi-
tuted styrenes were also found to be less efficient partners
during cross-metathesis with allyl ether-tethered R-diazo-ꢀ-
ketoester 4 (entries 4-6), compared to the diazo precursor
to tandem carbonyl ylide formation-1,3-dipolar cycloaddi-
tion;3 however, the reaction proceeded with high stereose-
lectivity to give predominantly E-isomers. R,ꢀ-Unsaturated
esters were quite efficient partners and gave disubstituted
R,ꢀ-unsaturated esters with high stereoselectivity (entries 7
and 8).
Encouraged by the ability of 4 to undergo stereoselective
cross-metathesis in the presence of diazo and allylic ether
functionalities, we examined one-pot cross-metathesis/oxo-
nium ylide formation-rearrangement. The sequence was
carried out using Grubbs II catalyst (5 mol %) with R-diazo-
ꢀ-ketoester 4 and metathesis partner (5-10 equiv) in CH2Cl2
at reflux for 14-20 h, followed by addition of Rh2(OAc)4
(4 mol %) at room temperature (TLC monitoring, ∼12-14
h). The methodology was first tested with 2-methyl-2-butene,
as a closely related prenyl ether had already been shown by
Hashimoto and co-workers to undergo a tandem oxonium
ylide formation/[2,3] sigmatropic rearrangement.10 In the
event, in situ generated prenyl ether 5a gave dihydrofuranone
6a in 87% yield in the one-pot process (compared to 73%
yield obtained with the corresponding methyl ester by
Table 1. Cross-Metathesis and Oxonium Ylide
Formation-Rearrangement Using Diazoester 4
a
Determined by H NMR. b Determined by GC-MS.
1
Hashimoto10 for the ylide transformation only) (Table 1,
entry 1). Vinylcyclohexane also worked efficiently in the one-
pot procedure to give the dihydrofuranone 6b in good yield
(entry 2) and with high diastereoselectivity (90:10). However,
sterically hindered 3,3-dimethyl-1-butene gave the desired
dihydrofuranone 6c in only modest yield (49%), but with
high diastereoselectivity (94:6) (entry 3); no change in dr
was observed when this Rh-catalyzed ylide rearrangement
was carried out at reflux (dr ) 93.5:6.5, with 54% isolated
one-pot yield for 6c), suggesting that the dr of rearrangement
is relatively independent of the reaction temperature. Styrene
and substituted styrenes also gave the dihydrofuranones 6d-f
in moderate yields (51-66%), but with high levels of
diastereoselectivity (entries 4-6). The modest yield during
the one-pot procedure for these olefins likely reflects cross-
metathesis efficiency with R-diazo-ꢀ-ketoester 4 (entries
3-6). The influence of ester functionality on the diastereo-
selectivity of the rearrangement was then studied. Esters
showed excellent diastereoselectivity and very good yields
during the process. No effect of sterics of the ester was
observed. The methyl ester gave >99:1 dr (entry 7), and a
tert-butyl ester gave 98:2 dr (entry 8).
(7) For [2,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of oxonium ylides formed under
Rh2(OAc) catalysis via in situ generated iodonium ylides, see: Murphy,
4
G. K.; West, F. G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4359–4361.
(8) (a) Pirrung, M. P.; Brown, W. L.; Rege, S.; Laughton, P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8561–8562. (b) Clark, J. S.; Fessard, T. C.; Wilson,
C. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1773–1776. (c) Yakura, T.; Muramatsu, W.; Uenishi,
J. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2005, 53, 989–994. (d) Clark, J. S.; Fessard, T. C.;
Whitlock, G. A. Tetrahedron 2005, 62, 73–78. (e) Clark, J. S.; Hayes, S. T.;
Wilson, C.; Gobbi, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 437–440. (f) Clark,
J. S.; Baxter, C. A.; Dossetter, A. G.; Poigny, S.; Castro, J. L.; Wittingham,
W. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1040–1055.
Complete allylic transposition in the above reactions
indicates that from oxonium ylide 2 a pericyclic ([2,3]
sigmatropic rearrangement) pathway is likely preferred over
one involving C-O cleavage-recombination.2,4 In most
cases, diastereoselectivity arising from the ylide rearrange-
(9) McCarthy, N.; McKervey, M. A.; Ye, T.; McCann, M.; Murphy,
E.; Doyle, M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5983–5986
.
(10) Kitagaki, S.; Yanamoto, Y.; Tsutsui, H.; Anada, M.; Nakajima, M.;
Hashimoto, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6361–6364.
5554
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 24, 2008