I. C. Choong et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5763–5765
5765
Compound 1
Compound 4
a
b
10000
1000
100
10
10000
1000
100
10
1
1
0.1
0.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Time (hr)
Time (hr)
Figure 2. Concentration vs time profiles of compounds 1 and 4 in mice after 5 mg/kg IV (closed circles) and 10 mg/kg PO (open circles). Concentrations are the averages of
three animals per timepoint.
Table 3
Pharmacokinetic parameters for 1 and 4
Compound
Dose (mg/kg)
Route
Cmax (ng/mL)
AUC (ng h/mL)
CL (mL/min/kg)
55
Vss (L/kg)
3
t1/2 (h)
%F
1 (SNS-032)
5
10
iv
po
2230
275
1510
434
0.6
0.5
14
4
5
10
30
45
iv
1660
411
2390
4600
1160
1430
6390
72
6
1.9
1.5
1.2
1.2
po
po
po
62
92
100
10,700
equilibrate to 37 °C for 10 min before reactions were started by addition of
NADPH. Aliquots were removed immediately, 30 min, and 60 min after
addition of NADPH. Reactions were stopped by addition of acetonitrile
containing internal standard (verapamil). Samples were placed on ice until
centrifugation (4100g, 10 min) to remove protein content and analyzed by LC–
MS/MS. Incubations with lidocaine and dextromethorphan served as positive
controls and indicated that reactions functioned properly.
References and notes
1. Sausville, E. A. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 32.
2. Shapiro, G. I. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 1770.
3. Marshall, N. F. et al J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 27176.
4. Akoulitchev, S.; Makela, T. P.; Weinber, R. A.; Reinberg, D. Nature 1995, 377, 557.
5. Marshall, N. F.; Price, D. H. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 12335.
6. Kamath, A. V.; Chong, S. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2005, 55, 110.
7. Kim, K. S.; Kimball, D. S.; Cai, Z.; Rawlins, D. B.; Misra, R. N.; Poss, M. A.;
Webster, K. R.; Hunt, J. T.; Han, W. U.S. Patent 6,521,759, 2003.
8. Inhibition of CDK2-cyclinA was assayed with the IMAP (Molecular Devices)
florescence polarization assay and was used according to the manufacturer’s
12. MDCK II cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 U
antibiotic solution (Cellgro) per milliliter. Cells were seeded into wells of 12-
transwell plates at a seeding density of 50,000 cells/well and cultured for
5 days. Prior to addition of the dosing solutions, MDCK monolayers were
washed with PBS. The bi-directional permeability studies were initiated by
adding an appropriate volume of DMEM media containing 2 lM compound to
guidelines. Briefly, 1 mM DTT and 100
IMAP tween reaction buffer. The final ATP concentration was 10
cyclinA was used at a final concentration of 2 nM (Cell Signaling, 7521) and the
substrate, FAM-H1-peptide, was used at final concentration of 100 lM
l
M sodium vanadate was added to the
either the apical (apical to basolateral transport) or basolateral (basolateral to
apical transport) side of the monolayer. Aliquots were taken from both the
apical and basolateral compartments after incubation for 3 h in a humidified
CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Samples were diluted with acetonitrile containing
internal standard (verapamil) and SNS-032 concentrations were analyzed
using a LC–MS/MS method. The permeability coefficient (Papp) was calculated
l
M. CDK2/
a
(Molecular Devices, R7439). Compounds were serial diluted in an 11-point
titration and IC50s, the concentration required to inhibit enzyme activity by
50%, was determined for each compound under the assay conditions described.
9. HCT116 cell lines were obtained from ATCC. Array Scan: HCT116 cells were
treated for 16 h with serial dilutions of compound and fixed and permeabilized
with 100% MeOH. The cells were then stained with either anti-RNA polymerase
II serine2 (Abcam #ab5095) antibody in combination with AlexaFluor 488 anti-
rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Invitrogen #A11008). The cell nuclei were
stained using Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen #3570). Fluorescence levels in the
cells were then analyzed by HCS using a Cellomics ArrayScan instrument.
10. Misra, R. N.; Xiao, H.; Kim, K. S.; Lu, S.; Han, W.; Barbosa, S. A.; Hunt, J. T.;
Rawlins, D. B.; Shan, W.; Ahmed, S. Z.; Qian, L.; Chen, B.; Zhao, R.; Bednarz, M.
S.; Kellar, K. A.; Mulheron, J. G.; Batorsky, R.; Roongta, U.; Kamath, A.; Marathe,
P.; Ranadive, S. A.; Sack, J. S.; Tokarski, J. S.; Pavletich, N. P.; Lee, F. Y. F.;
Webster, K. R.; Kimball, S. D. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1719.
*
*
as follows: Papp = (1/A) C0 (dQ/dt), with A representing the surface are of the
membrane, C0 the initial concentration, and dQ/dt the drug flux.
13. All animals used were handled according to Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
institutional guidelines. Compounds 1 and 4 were dissolved in 2.1 mM tartaric
acid (pH 4.0) to obtain dosing solutions of 1, 3, or 4.5 mg/mL. Female, 6- to 8-
week-old CD-1 (3 mice/timepoint) received
a single IV dose of 5 mg/kg
compound 1 or 2 via the tail vein at 5 mL/kg or single po doses of 10, 30,
and 45 mg/kg via oral gavage at 10 mL/kg. After euthanasia, blood samples
were collected via cardiac puncture at 0.083 (iv), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3 (po), 4, 6, and
8 h postdose into a K2-EDTA tube and placed on ice until centrifugation to
harvest plasma. Plasma samples were stored frozen until analyzed by LC–MS/
MS. The lower limit of detection was 1 ng/mL. Back-calculated standards and
quality control samples (15, 125, and 500 ng/mL) did not deviate by more than
20% from their nominal concentration. Concentrations per timepoint were
averaged before estimating PK parameters.
11. Microsomal stability assays were performed in 100 mM sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.4, containing 3.3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mg/mL liver microsomal protein,
1 lM test article, and 1 mM NADPH. The reaction mixture was allowed to