been reported by using 5-azido4b and N-TFA4 sialyl phos-
phites based on a stepwise strategy. Recently, we reported
the synthesis of R(2,8) tetrasialic acid using the 5N,4O-
carbonyl-protected thiosialoside.7 The 5N,4O-carbonyl pro-
tection of sialic acids enables R sialylation without use of
acetonitrile. However, these effective methods, which are
based on modification of the C5 acetamide group, require
conversion of amino groups into the naturally occurring
N-acetyl derivative (Neu5Ac) or N-glycolyl derivative
(Neu5Glc) via highly polar amino acid intermediates.
Recently, we developed an efficient method for the
synthesis of oligosaccharides that is based one-pot glycosy-
lation and polymer-assisted deprotection.8-10 The one-pot
glycosylation involved sequential chemo- and regioselective
glycosylation to provide oligosaccharides from several simple
building blocks in one pot.11 The polymer-assisted depro-
tection involved deprotection of solid-supported, protected
oligosaccharides followed by their release from the solid
supports. The prelinker 4, composed of an activated ester
and a vinyl ether linked via an ether bond, was used for
quantitative loading of the protected oligosaccharides on to
a solid-support. Deprotection was made easier by supporting
the substrates on solids.12 Herein, we report the synthesis of
the R(2,9) trisialic acid 1 by one-pot glycosylation and
polymer-assisted deprotection using 5N,4O-carbonyl pro-
tected sialyl donors and a new prelinker for polymer-assisted
deprotection.
Scheme 1. Strategy for the Synthesis of the R(2,9) Trisialic
Acid 1 Based on One-Pot Glycosylation and Polymer-Assisted
Deprotection
Our strategy for the synthesis of R(2,9) trisialic acid 1,
based on one-pot glycosylation and polymer-assisted depro-
tection, involves chemo- and regioselective glycosylation of
thiosialoside 7 with the S-Box sialyl donor 6a at the 9
position followed by coupling of the resulting disaccharide
with R-sialoside 87 at the 9 position (Scheme 1). The 5N,4O-
carbonyl protection of building blocks 6-8 is effective for
R-sialylation at the 9 position. The S-Box glycosyl donors
are adaptable to sialylation and can be selectively activated
in the presence of thioglycosides.13,14 The 8,9 diols 7 and 8
were effective as acceptors for R(2,9) sialylation because
the C8 hydroxyl group does not adversely interfere with
glycosylation at the C-9 position.4f The prelinker 3, which
links an activated ester and a vinyl ether via a carbon chain,
was newly designed for polymer-assisted deprotection of the
protected trisialoside 5. The linker 3 undergoes acetalization
with the protected trisialic acid 5 at the 8 and/or 8′ positions;
amidation with an amino group on ArgoPore thereafter
immobilizes the trisaccharide 5 onto a solid support. The
ArgoPore resin enables deprotection of solid-supported,
protected oligosaccharides via debenzylation through Birch
reduction.10 The ester unit in the carbon linker chain of 3
exhibits enhanced stability under basic conditions. In addi-
tion, the reactivity of the vinyl ether of 3 toward acetalization
is improved, and the resulting acetal unit is more easily
hydrolyzed under acidic conditions compared with linker 4
due to the lack of an electron-withdrawing oxygen unit.
The chemical properties of the linkers prepared from the
prelinkers 3 and 4 were compared. The acylated benzy-
lamines 9 and 10 were used as model compounds. Treatment
of 9 at 80 °C for 12 h under basic conditions, which allows
for hydrolysis of both the C1 ester and the 5N,4O-carbonyl
protecting group, had no effect on 9. On the other hand, under
similar conditions, hydrolysis of the R-alkoxyacetamide 10
occurred. Next, we exposed 9 and 10 to 1% trifluo-
romethanesulfonic acid in CH2Cl2 in the presence of H2O
(7) (a) Tanaka, H.; Nishiura, Y.; Takahashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 7124–7125.
(8) Tanaka, H.; Yamada, H.; Takahashi, T. Trends Glycosci. Glycote-
chnol. 2007, 19, 183–193
(9) (a) Yamada, H.; Harada, T.; Takahashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 7919–7920. (b) Tanaka, H.; Adachi, M.; Takahashi, T. Chem.sEur.
.
J. 2005, 11, 849–862
(10) Tanaka, H.; Ishida, T.; Matoba, N.; Tsukamoto, H.; Yamada, H.;
Takahashi, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6349–6352
.
.
(11) (a) Raghavan, S.; Kahne, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1580–
1591. (b) Zhang, Z.; Ollmann, I. R.; Ye, X.-S.; Wischnat, R.; Baasov, T.;
Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 734–753. (c) Recent review of
one-pot glycosylation: Wang, Y.; Ye, X.-S.; Zhang, L.-H. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 2189–2200.
(12) (a) Matsuda, A.; Doi, T.; Tanaka, H.; Takahashi, T. Synlett 2001,
1101–1104. (b) Tanaka, H.; Zenkoh, T.; Setoi, H.; Takahashi, T. Synlett
2002, 1427–1430.
(13) (a) Demchenko, A. V.; Malysheva, N. N.; De Meo, C. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 455–458. (b) Kamat, M. N.; Demchenko, A. V. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 3215–3218
.
(14) De Meo, C.; Parker, O. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2005, 16, 303–
307. (d) Pornsuriyasak, P.; Demchenko, A. V. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2005,
16, 433–439. (e) Wang, C.-C.; Lee, J.-C.; Luo1, S.-Y.; Kulkarni, S. S.;
Huang, Y.-W.; Lee, C.-C.; Chang, K.-L.; Hung, S.-C. Nature 2007, 446,
896–899
.
5598
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 24, 2008