with water. This carbocation may be the coupling product of
the s-indolyl radical from dechlorination of the anion radical
of 1b with the cation radical of 2a.
According to the above experimental results, a possible
mechanistic rationalization for the formation of benzo[c]carbazole
3e is depicted (Scheme 5).
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (20872056) for financial support.
Scheme 3
has a similar absorption, fluorescence emission and phospho-
rescence emission spectra to those of indole-3-carbaldehyde.7b,10
This energy is insufficient for homolytic fission of the C–Cl
bond in 1b as compared with the estimation of D’Auria that the
dissociation energy of the C–Br bond in 5-bromofuran-2-
Notes and references
z Typical experimental procedure: 1a (0.256 g, 1.0 mmol) and styrene
2a (0.104 g, 2.25 mmol) and pyridine (0.119 g, 1.5 mmol) were
dissolved in 25 mL dry acetone. The solution was distributed into five
10 mL Pyrex tubes and deaerated by bubbling Ar for 30 min and
irradiated at l Z 300 nm with a high-pressure mercury lamp (500 W)
at ambient temperature. The progress of reaction was monitored by
TLC at regular intervals. After the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure, the residue was separated by column chromatography on
silica gel eluted by hexane–ethyl acetate 10 : 1 (v/v) to afford product
3a. The solid was further purified by recrystallization from methanol.
y Crystal data for 3h (recrystallized from acetone–hexane). C19H17NO,
Mr = 275.34, monoclinic, space group P21/c, a = 11.209(3), b =
7.292(2), c = 18.864(4) A, b = 114.178(13)1, V = 1406.6(6) A3,
colorless plates, Dc = 1.300 g cmꢀ3, T = 293(2) K, Z = 4, m(Mo-Ka)
= 0.71073 mmꢀ1, 2ymax = 511, 2600 reflections measured, 1984
unique (Rint = 0.1591) which were used in all calculations. The final
wR(F2) was 0.0720 (for all data), R1 = 0.0583.
carbaldehyde is 70 kcal molꢀ1 2c
Thus it could be supposed
.
that the photoreaction of 1b with 2a is initiated not by the direct
C–Cl fission but by the formation of an exciplex and subsequent
single electron transfer which promotes the cleavage of C–Cl
bond. Support for this proposal is the difference of photo-
reaction of 1b in aqueous acetone in the presence of 2a and in
the absence of 2a under irradiation of l Z 300 nm as shown in
Scheme 4.
That no substitution reaction took place for 1b in aqueous
acetone or in methanol in the absence of 2a indicated that
there was no s-indolyl cation produced under direct photo-
lysis; Comparatively in the presence of 2a, the photoreaction
of 1a with 2a could proceed smoothly to produce 3a in both
solvents. A reasonable explanation as to the difference is the
electron transfer from 2a to excited 1b can promote the fission
of a C–Cl bond. The minor product 5 in aqueous acetone
seems to be derived from the combination of a carbocation
1 (a) V. Dichiarante, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2007, 46, 6495; (b) S. Protti, M. Fagnoni and A. Albini, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10670; (c) M. Fagnoni and A. Albini,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 713; (d) S. Protti, M. Fagnoni and A.
Albini, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 5675; (e) M. A. Clyne and
F. Aldabbagh, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2006, 4, 268; (f) S. M. Barolo,
X. Teng, G. D. Cuny and R. A. Rossi, J. Org. Chem., 2006, 71,
8493.
2 (a) M. D’Auria, R. Ferri, G. Poggi, G. Mauriello and R. Racioppi,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2000, 1653; (b) M. D’Auria and T. Ferri,
J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 8360; (c) M. D’Auria, G. Piancatelli and
T. Ferri, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 4019.
3 For a review of carbazole alkaloids, see for example: J. Bergman
and B. Pelcman, in Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, ed.
Atta-ur-Rhaman, P. W. Le Quesne, Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg,
1988.
4 (a) D. J. Carini, R. F. Kaltenbach, J. Liu, P. A. Ben, J. Boylan, M.
Boisclair, L. Brizuela, C. R. Burton, S. Cox, R. Grafstrom, B. A.
Harrison, K. Harrison, E. Akamike, J. A. Markwalder, Y.
Nakano, S. P. Seitz, D. M. Sharp, G. L. Trainora and T. M.
Sieleckia, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2001, 11, 2209; (b) R. T. Dorr,
W. Bellamy, J. D. Liddil, A. Baker and K. W. Bair, Anti-Cancer
Drug Des., 1998, 13, 825; (c) K. Nakamura, T. Uenaka, T. Nagasu,
H. Sugumi, A. Yamaguchi, Y. Kotake, T. Okada, J. Kamata and
K. Yoshimatsu, Cancer Sci., 2003, 94, 119.
Scheme 4
5 (a) S. R. Flanagan, D. C. Harrowven and M. Bradley, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2003, 44, 1795; (b) J. H. Smitrovich and I. W. Davies, Org.
Lett., 2004, 6, 533; (c) P. Appukkuttan, E. Van der Eycken and W.
Dehaen, Synlett, 2005, 127; (d) R. Pathak, J. M. Nhlapo, S.
Govender, J. P. Michael, W. A. L. van Otterlo and C. B. de
Koning, Tetrahedron, 2006, 62, 2820; (e) K. H. Grellmann and U.
Schmitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 6267.
6 J. C. Powers, J. Org. Chem., 1966, 31, 2627.
7 (a) K. Pitchumani, J. N. Gamlin, V. Ramamurthy and J. R.
Scheffer, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2049; (b) P. S. Song and W. E.
Kurtin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 4892.
8 M. Terzidis, C. A. Tsoleridis and J. Stephanidou-Stephanatou,
Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 7828.
9 M. Z. Jin, L. Yang, L. M. Wu, Y. C. Liu and Z. L. Liu, Chem.
Commun., 1998, 2451.
10 M. P. De Mello, S.M. De Toledo, M. Haun, G. Cilento and N.
Duran, Biochemistry, 1980, 19, 5270.
Scheme 5
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
5178 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 5176–5178