Organic Letters
Letter
a
Table 5. Substitution vs Elimination of Iododecane Using 2a
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was internally funded by the Israeli Prime Minister’s
office.
■
b
entry
conditions
SN2:E2
REFERENCES
■
c
d
1
2
3
4
5
anhydrous DMSO−THF, <3 min
1:6.7
(1) (a) See: ChemBioChem. Special Issue: Fluorine in the Life Science
2004, 5, 557−726. (b) Gillis, E. P.; Eastman, K. J.; Hill, M. D.; Donnelly,
D. J.; Meanwell, N. A. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 8315−8359.
(c) Neumann, C. N.; Ritter, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54,
3216−3221.
(2) (a) Sather, A. C.; Buchwald, S. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2146−
2157. (b) Champagne, P. A.; Desroches, J.; Hamel, J.-D.; Vandamme,
M.; Paquin, J.-F. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 9073−9174.
(3) Liotta, C. L.; Harris, H. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 2250−2252.
(4) (a) Sun, H.; Dimagno, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2050−
2051. (b) Sun, H.; Dimagno, S. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45,
2720−2725.
c
e
hydrous DMSO−THF, 48 h
anhydrous tert-butanol, 10 days
1:0.6
e
1:0.1
e
hydrous tert-butanol, 6 weeks
1:0
d
anhydrous DCM, 30 min
1:0.6
a
b
c
1
Anhydrous 2a (0.6 M). Ratios were determined by H NMR. 1:1
d
e
mix. Full conversion was obtained. 95% (entry 3) and 42% (entry 4)
conversions were obtained. Starting material and some solvent
impurity were observed (Figures S38 and S40 in the SI).
(5) Cox, D. P.; Terpinski, J.; Lawrynowicz, W. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49,
3216−3219.
(6) Christe, K. O.; Wilson, W. W.; Wilson, R. D.; Bau, R.; Feng, J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7619−7625.
to the substitution product.22 Inspired by this work, we
proceeded to investigate the reactivity of 2a using anhydrous
tert-butanol as a solvent (but not as a complex). Although much
slower, this reaction led almost exclusively to the substitution
product fluorodecane after 10 days at rt (95% conversion, entry
3). Conducting a control experiment using the hydrated 2a in
tert-butanol under the same conditions gave after 6 weeks
exclusively fluorodecane (entry 4), albeit only 42% conversion
was achieved. Interestingly, when DCM was used, the H-bond
interactions of the anhydrous 2a with the solvent indeed reduced
the basicity of the fluoride ion yielding almost a 2:1 ratio of the
aforementioned products after 0.5 h (entry 5).
(7) Gnann, R. Z.; Wagner, R. I.; Christe, K. O.; Bau, R.; Olah, G. A.;
Wilson, W. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 112−115.
(8) Allen, L. J.; Muhuhi, J. M.; Bland, D. C.; Merzel, R.; Sanford, M. S. J.
Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 5827−5833.
(9) Ryan, S.; Schimler, S. D.; Bland, D. C.; Sanford, M. Org. Lett. 2015,
17, 1866−1869.
(10) Schimler, S. D.; Ryan, S. J.; Bland, D. C.; Anderson, J. E.; Sanford,
M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 12137−12145.
(11) Harmon, K. M.; Southworth, B. A.; Wilson, K. E.; Keefer, P. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7294−7295.
In summary, this report demonstrates the facile synthesis of a
new family of highly reactive anhydrous ammonium fluorides
and their stability, solubility, and reactivity. The high thermal
stabilities of 2a−d (100 or 140 °C) are attributed to the
distortion formed at the transition state toward HE (DFT
studies). Their solubility in solvents such as CH3CN, DMSO−
THF, and DCM and high reactivity (differences in orders of
magnitude between the anhydrous vs hydrous counterparts)
open the opportunity to accomplish innovative materials (e.g.,
chiral or amphiphilic) that may exhibit excessive potential for
organofluorine chemistry.
(12) (a) Marciano, D.; Columbus, I.; Elias, S.; Goldvaser, M.;
Shoshanim, O.; Ashkenazi, N.; Zafrani, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77,
10042−10049. (b) Zafrani, Y.; Yehezkel, L.; Goldvaser, M.; Marciano,
D.; Waysbort, D.; Gershonov, E.; Columbus, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011,
9, 8445−8451.
(13) This concept was previously introduced by Harmon et al. who
claimed the synthesis of the monohydrated (but not the anhydrous)
form of such compounds (see ref 11). Unfortunately, as in the case of
their adamantylammonium derivate, no relevant chemical or physical
properties, such as stability, solubility, or reactivity, were reported.
(14) Gaussian 09, Revision B.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2010.
For full citation, see the SI.
(15) All transition states were verified by calculating the intrinsic
reaction coordinates (IRC) and/or by examining the imaginary
frequency’s normal mode. See: Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem.
Phys. 1989, 90, 2154−2161.
(16) Shirakawa, S.; Liu, S.; Kaneko, S.; Kumatabara, Y.; Fukuda, A.;
Omagari, Y.; Maruoka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 15767−
15770.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
■
S
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures, analytical data, absolute ener-
gies, number of imaginary frequencies, and Cartesian
coordinates of all stationary points (PDF)
(17) It should be noted that during the course of the reaction including
in the formation of the TS, a considerable decrease in charge is expected.
Therefore, a decrease in the reaction rate is anticipated when the
solvent’s polarity is increased.
(18) Gerken, M.; Boatz, J. A.; Kornath, A.; Haiges, R.; Schneider, S.;
Schroer, T.; Christe, K. O. J. Fluorine Chem. 2002, 116, 49−58.
(19) This observation does not contradict the DSC results, as these
compounds were heated in this case for much longer periods.
(20) Adams, D. J.; Clark, J. H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 225.
(21) Schwesinger, R.; Link, R.; Wenzl, P.; Kossek, S. Chem. - Eur. J.
2006, 12, 438−445.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Authors
(22) Kim, D. W.; Jeong, H.-J.; Lim, S. T.; Sohn, M.-H.;
Katzenellenbogen, J. A.; Chi, D. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 957−962.
ORCID
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX