C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
equivalent binding of the biphenyl substituent 15 to both, demon-
strating that the affinity to the acyl substituent is dominant over
the sialic acid to galactose linkage. MAG bound to sialosides with
other substituents including benzoyl- (7) and chlorobenzoyl (8-10)
analogues of either R2-3 (E) or R2-6 (F) sialosides. The results
are consistent with previous studies evaluating the affinity of MAG
toward 9-N-acyl substituents on R-methyl-NeuAc.8
To confirm that the signals for MAG resulted from increased
affinity, a selected series of related sialosides with 9-acyl substit-
uents (7, 8, and 10) of E and F were resynthesized and tested for
binding by MAG and CD22 (Figure S2). While CD22 bound only
the R2-6 sialoside (F) series, MAG bound both, with preference
for the R2-3 (E) series compounds. These compounds were also
assessed for inhibitory potency in an ELISA competition assay.10
Compounds 7E, 8E, and 10E gave IC50 values of 4.9, 9.7, and 2.2
µM, respectively, representing 50-200-fold enhancement of affinity
over the unsubstituted R2-3 sialoside H (IC50 of 490 µM; data
not shown).
Figure 2. Binding of sialoside-specific plant lectins to a sialoside analogue
glycan array. Biotinylated lectins, MAA (top) and SNA (bottom) specific
for Neu5AcR2-3Gal or Neu5AcR2-6Gal linkages, respectively, were
mixed with Alexa-fluor 488 labeled streptavidin, overlaid onto the printed
analogue array, washed, and scanned for fluorescence (see Supporting
Information). Acyl analogues 1-34 of E (yellow) and F (green) correspond
to acyl groups listed in Table S1. Shown is relative fluorescence of lectins
bound to each glycan printed at 5 serial dilutions starting at 100 µM.
“NeuAc” labeled lanes are sialosides with unsubstituted Neu5Ac in R2-3
(H) and R2-6 (I) linkage to N-acetyllactosamine.
In summary, we demonstrate that a sialoside analogue array
allows for the synthesis of sialoside analogues in small quantity
for subsequent screening for high affinity ligands of siglecs and
other sialoside binding GBPs.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Dr. Paul Crocker for
providing cell lines producing siglec-Fc chimeras of MAG and
sialoadhesin, the Consortium for Functional Glycomics (GM62116)
for the CD22-Fc chimera, Dr. Nicolai Bovin for compound J, and
Ms. Anna Tran-Crie for help in preparing this manuscript. This
research was supported by NIH Grant GM060938.
Supporting Information Available: General procedures for prepa-
rations of the sialoside analogue library, a complete list of printed
analogues, procedures for printing and analysis of GBPs, and analytical
data for MAA and SNA plant lectins. This material is available free of
Figure 3. Binding of siglec-Fc chimeras to the sialoside analogue array.
Mouse sialoadhesin-Fc chimera (top) and mouse MAG-Fc chimera (bottom)
complexed with goat antihuman IgG-FITC (2:1; 50 µg/mL total protein)
were overlaid onto the printed analogue array, washed for Figure 2).
Numbered acyl analogues attached to compound E (yellow) or F (green)
are found in Table S1.
References
(1) Crocker, P. R.; Paulson, J. C.; Varki, A. Nat. ReV. Immunol. 2007, 7, 255–
266.
(2) Blixt, O.; Collins, B. E.; van den Nieuwenhof, I. M.; Crocker, P. R.; Paulson,
J. C. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31007–31019.
(3) Alphey, M. S.; Attrill, H.; Crocker, P. R.; van Aalten, D. M. F. J. Biol.
Chem. 2003, 278, 3372–3377.
concentration (Figure 1B). Relative to the natural sialoside (c), the
9-BPC substituent (f) produced equivalent binding at 64-128-fold
lower printing concentration.
(4) Bochner, B. S.; Alvarez, R. A.; Mehta, P.; Bovin, N. V.; Blixt, O.; White,
J. R.; Schnaar, R. L. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 4307–4312.
(5) Kelm, S.; Brossmer, R.; Isecke, R.; Gross, H. J.; Strenge, K.; Schauer, R.
Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 255, 663–672.
The quality of a glycan array containing the full library was
assessed using the binding of the plant lectins, Maccia amurensis
agglutinin (MAA) and Sambucus nigra agglutinin (SNA), specific
for R2-3 and R2-6 sialosides, respectively. Fortuitously, binding
of neither lectin is blocked by 9-acyl substituents, facilitating their
use to assess the printing efficiency. All 9-acyl-substituted E and
F sialosides were recognized comparably by MAA and SNA,
respectively (Figure 2).
The full array was then used to assess the specificity of three
siglecs, CD22 (Siglec-2), MAG (Siglec-4), and sialoadhesin (Siglec-
1). In keeping with its specificity for R2-6 sialosides, CD22 bound
only to sialosides in the F series (Figure S2). However, none of
the N-acyl substituents exhibited an affinity equivalent to BPC (F15;
see Figures 1 and S1).
(6) Zaccai, N. R.; Maenaka, K.; Maenaka, T.; Crocker, P. R.; Brossmer, R.;
Kelm, S.; Jones, E. Y. Structure 2003, 11, 557–567.
(7) Schnaar, R. L.; Collins, B. E.; Wright, L. P.; Kiso, M.; Tropak, M. B.;
Roder, J. C.; Crocker, P. R. Sphingolipids Signaling Modulators NerV. Syst.
1998, 845, 92–105.
(8) Shelke, S. V.; Gao, G. P.; Mesch, S.; Gathje, H.; Kelm, S.; Schwardt, O.;
Ernst, B.Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4951–4965.
(9) Oetke, C.; Brossmer, R.; Mantey, L. R.; Hinderlich, S.; Isecke, R.; Reutter,
W.; Keppler, O. T.; Pawlita, M. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 6688–6695.
(10) Collins, B. E.; Blixt, O.; Han, S. F.; Duong, B.; Li, H. Y.; Nathan, J. K.;
Bovin, N.; Paulson, J. C. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 2994–3003.
(11) Kelm, S.; Gerlach, J.; Brossmer, R.; Danzer, C. P.; Nitschke, L. J. Exp.
Med. 2002, 195, 1207–1213.
(12) Blixt, O.; Head, S.; Mondala, T.; Scanlan, C.; Huflejt, M. E.; Alvarez, R.;
Bryan, M. C.; Fazio, F.; Calarese, D.; Stevens, J.; Razi, N.; Stevens, D. J.;
Skehel, J. J.; van Die, I.; Burton, D. R.; Wilson, I. A.; Cummings, R.;
Bovin, N.; Wong, C. H.; Paulson, J. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004,
101, 17033–17038.
(13) Blixt, O.; Paulson, J. C. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 687–690.
(14) Han, S.; Collins, B. E.; Bengtson, P.; Paulson, J. C. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005,
1, 93–97.
(15) Madsen, R.; Roberts, C.; Fraserreid, B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7920–7926.
(16) Barstrom, M.; Bengtsson, M.; Blixt, O.; Norberg, T. Carbohydr. Res. 2000,
328, 525–531.
Surprisingly, Fc chimeras of sialoadhesin and MAG did not bind
to sialosides with unsubstituted NeuAc but bound R2-3 (E) or
R2-6 sialosides with selective 9-N-acyl substituents in repeated
assays (Figure 3). Sialoadhesin exhibited increased affinities to a
few bisphenyl analogues of E (14, 15), and F (15, 30), with the
JA801052G
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 21, 2008 6681