5882
S. Lebreton et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 5879–5883
a) NaH, PMBCl
.
b) SO3 py
OH
Me
OPMB
Me
OPMB
OR
OPMB
3R
5R
HO
O
e) Cy2BCl
f) TBSCl
65%
O
g) Bu3SnH,
Me2AlCl
HO
includes 3S,5S isomer
3
4
6
7.9 g
5R
OTBS
c) LiNH2 BH3
d) Swern ox.
88%
86%
O
Me
Me
Me
17.1 g
OAc
57:43 ratio
>10:1 syn
Ph
CO2H
10.8 g
19.8 g
7 R = H
N
O
9
8 R = TBS
90%
Me Me OH
Me
includes 5S isomer
5
5.6 g
h) Mitsunobu
i) RCM
j) K2CO3, MeOH
Ph
10
15.5 g
HN
COX
O
k) TBSCl
l) DDQ
OPMB
OPMB
OR
O
TBSO
O
m) DMP
q) Δ;
LiC CPh
OR
O
OR
O
OR
Me
OTBS
Me
n) HWE
O
O
OTBS
Me
OTBS
Me
(diastereomers
and E/Z-isomers)
O
O
80%
.
r) HF py
13 X = Oallyl 4.8 g
o) Pd0
p) (PhO)2PN3
85%
11 R = Ac
12 R = H
11'
12'
4.04g
16 R = TBS
2 R = H
14 X = OH 4.3 g; 97%
5.3 g; 25%
2.54 g
15 X = N3
4.1 g; 90%
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) NaH, 4-MeOBnCl, THF (76%); (b) SO3 pyridine, DMSO, NEt3, CH2Cl2 (85%); (c) LiNH2BH3, THF (99%); (d) (COCl)2, DMSO, NEt3, CH2Cl2
(91%); (e) 4, Cy2BCl, NEt3, Et2O, 0 °C ? ꢀ78 °C, add 6; MeOH, pH 7 buffer, H2O2 (93%); (f) TBSCl, imidazole, cat. DMAP, DMF (95%); (g) Me2AlCl, Bu3SnH, CH2Cl2 (86%); (h) DIAD,
Ph3P, THF (82%); (i) 9 mol% PhCHRu(PCy3)2(Cl)2, CH2Cl2; (j) K2CO3, MeOH (30% for 2 steps); (k) TBSCl, imidazole, cat. DMAP, DMF (95%); (l) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O (18:1) (92%); (m)
Dess–Martin periodinane, CH2Cl2 (95%); (n) (EtO)2P(O)CH2CO2CH2CHCH2, NaH, THF, 0 °C ? rt (96%); (o) 10 mol% Pd(PPh3)3, morpholine, THF (97%); (p) (PhO)2PN3, NEt3,
benzene (90%); (q) 15, benzene, reflux; then concentrate, dissolve in THF and add to LiCCPh in THF, ꢀ78 °C (90%); (r) HF pyridine, pyridine, THF, rt.
8. Lebreton, S.; Xie, X.-S.; Ferguson, D.; De Brabander, J. K. Tetrahedron 2004, 60,
9635.
and was prepared in multigram quantities via total synthesis.
9. Reviews: (a) Farina, C.; Gagliardi, S. Drug Discov. Today 1999, 4, 163; (b)
mide A, saliphenylhalamide, was selected for further evaluation
These studies highlight the power of synthetic chemistry as an en-
abling tool for implementing a natural product-based discovery
and development program.
Sennoune, S. R.; Luo, D.; Martinez-Zaguilan, R. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 40,
185; (c) Fais, S.; De Milito, A.; You, H.; Qin, W. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10627; (d)
Forgac, M. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 917.
10. For an in vitro and in vivo study of the antimetastatic potential of a small-
molecule V-ATPase inhibitor, see: Supina, R.; Petrangolini, G.; Pratesi, G.;
Tortoreto, M.; Favini, E.; Dal Bo, L.; Farina, C.; Zunino, F. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
2008, 324, 15.
Acknowledgments
11. Lardner, A. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2001, 69, 522.
We thank the National Institutes of Health (CA 90349 and CA
95471), the Robert A. Welch Foundation, and Merck Research Lab-
oratories for financial support.
12. (a) Paglin, S.; Hollister, T.; Delohery, T.; Hackett, N.; McMahill, M.; Sphicas, E.;
Domingo, D.; Yahalom, J. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 439; (b) Kroemer, G.; Jäättelä, M.
Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 886; (c) Kondo, Y.; Kanzawa, T.; Sawaya, R.; Kondo, S.
Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 726; (d) Mathew, R.; Karantza-Wadsworth, V.; White,
E. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2007, 7, 961.
13. Su, Y.; Zhou, A.; Al-Lamki, R. S.; Karet, F. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 20013.
14. Imai-Senga, Y.; Sun-Wada, G. H.; Wada, Y.; Futai, M. Gene 2002, 289, 7.
15. The double bond geometry of the dienamide side-chain of SaliA is hard to
control and maintain,4b and SaliA does suffer from decomposition upon storage
(neat or DMSO solutions).
Appendix Supplementary. data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
16. At 100 nM concentration, SaliPhe inhibited the growth of the tumorigenic
human mammary epithelial cell line HME50-T (95% growth inhibition)
without affecting the growth of the parent (isogenic) human mammary
epithelial cell line HME50, whereas SaliA indiscriminatory inhibited the
growth of both cell lines (75% and 60%, respectively, at 100 nM). We thank
G. Dikmen and G. Gellert in the laboratory of J. Shay (Department of Cell
Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas) for performing these
experiments. For a reference on the generation of the tumorigenic HME50-T
cell line from the isogenic HME50 cell line see: Herbert, B.-S.; Gellert, G. C.;
Hochreiter, A.; Pongracz, K.; Wright, W. E.; Zielinska, D.; Chin, A. C.; Harley, C.
B.; Shay, J. W.; Gryaznov, S. M. Oncogene 2005, 24, 5262.
17. In a genome-wide synthetic lethal RNAi screen, V-ATPase was identified as a
target that specifically reduces cell-viability of a human non-small-cell lung
cancer line (NCI-H1155) in the presence of otherwise sublethal concentrations
of paclitaxel. Exposure to SaliPhe, paclitaxel, or a combination of these agents
revealed a significant collaborative impact on cell viability in the same cancer
cell line, see: Whitehurst, A. W.; Bodemann, B. O.; Cardenas, J.; Ferguson, D.;
Girard, L.; Peyton, M.; Minna, J. D.; Michnoff, C.; Hao, W.; Roth, M. G.; Xie, X.-J.;
White, M. A. Nature 2007, 446, 815.
References
1. (a) Newman, D. J.; Cragg, G. M.; Snader, K. M. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1022; (b)
Butler, M. S. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 2141; (c) Dixon, N.; Wong, L. S.; Geerlings, T.
H.; Micklefield, J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007, 24, 1288.
2. Wilson, R. M.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8329.
3. (a) Erickson, K. L.; Beutler, J. A.; Cardellina, J. H., II; Boyd, M. R. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 8188 (correction: J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1532); For a structural
revision, see: (b) Wu, Y.; Esser, L.; De Brabander, J. K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 4308.
4. For total syntheses of salicylihalamide, see3b and (a) Wu, Y.; Seguil, O. R.; De
Brabander, J. K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4241; (b) Wu, Y.; Liao, X.; Wang, R.; Xie, X.-S.;
De Brabander, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3245; (c) Snider, B. B.; Song, F.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1817; (d) Labrecque, D.; Charron, S.; Rej, R.; Blais, C.; Lamothe,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2645; (e) Fürstner, A.; Dierkes, T.; Thiel, O. R.;
Blanda, G. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5286; (f) Smith, A. B., III; Zheng, J. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 6455; (g) Herb, C.; Bayer, A.; Maier, M. E. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5649;
Formal total syntheses (h) Yadav, J. S.; Sundar, P.; Reddy, R. Synthesis 2007,
1070; (i) Holloway, G. A.; Huegel, H. M.; Rizzacasa, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
2200; (j) Haack, T.; Haack, K.; Diederich, W. E.; Blackman, B.; Roy, S.; Pusuluri,
S.; Georg, G. I. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7592.
18. Prepared in 2 steps (90–95% yield, 98–99% de) from (ꢀ)-pseudoephedrine
according to: (a) Myers, A. G.; Yang, B. H.; Chen, H.; McKinstry, L.; Kopecky, D.
J.; Gleason, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6496; (b) Fettes, A.; Carreira, E. M. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9274.
5. Reviews: (a) Yet, L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4283; (b) Beutler, J. A.; McKee, T. C.
Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 787; (c) Bowman, E. J.; Bowman, B. J. J. Bioenerg.
Biomembr. 2005, 31, 29.
6. Boyd, M. R.; Farina, C.; Belfiore, P.; Gagliardi, S.; Kim, J.-W.; Hayakawa, Y.;
Beutler, J. A. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001, 297, 114.
19. For the discovery and a detailed discussion on the ‘‘pentenyl aldehyde” effect
on the stereochemical outcome of aldol reactions, see: (a) Harris, C. R.; Kuduk,
S. D.; Balog, A.; Savin, K. A.; Danishefsky, S. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2267;
(b) Lee, C. B.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Chappell, M. D.; Stachel, S. J.; Chou, T.-C.; Guan,
Y.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5249.
7. Xie, X.-S.; Padron-Perez, D.; Liao, X.; Wang, J.; Roth, M. G.; De Brabander, J. K. J.
Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 19755.
20. Paterson, I.; Goodman, J. M.; Lister, M. A.; Schumann, R. C.; McClure, C. K.;
Norcross, R. D. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 4663.