A. Vallverdú-Queralt et al. / Food Chemistry 199 (2016) 902–910
903
4-vinylcatechol and 4-vinylsyringol adducts of several antho-
cyanins, were also identified in wine (Hayasaka & Asenstorfer,
2002) and in other plant extracts (Lu, Foo, & Wong, 2002). Because
of their particular chromatic and physico-chemical properties and
potential role in wine color, phenylpyranoanthocyanins have been
much investigated. Their quantification in wine has been achieved
by HPLC coupled to diode array detection (DAD) (Wirth et al.,
2012) or QqQ-MS in the MRM mode (Arapitsas et al., 2012;
Lambert et al., 2015), using Mv3G, the major grape anthocyanin,
as the calibration standard. Phenylpyranoanthocyanins have been
synthesized in model solution from either vinylphenols (Fulcrand
et al., 1996; Hakansson, Pardon, Hayasaka, de Sa, & Herderich,
(VG) as a case study. In this paper, we compare UPLC–DAD–ESI–
MSn and NMR analysis for monitoring the synthesis of Gpyra-
noMv3G and propose qNMR as a universal method to determine
the different forms of Mv3G (the major anthocyanin in grapes
and wines) and its reaction products. We also use a comprehensive
strategy combining ultra-high performance liquid chromatography
coupled to diode array detection and electrospray ionization ion
trap mass spectrometry (UPLC–DAD–ESI–IT-MS) and two dimen-
sion NMR (i.e. homonuclear 1H diffusion ordered spectroscopy
(DOSY) and 1H–13C Heteronuclear Single Quantum Correlation
(HSQC) and Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) anal-
ysis), for separation and identification of reaction products.
As far as we know, this is the first study to provide an accurate
quantification of the pyranoanthocyanins using qNMR as well as
full characterization of the reaction medium by a combination of
LC–DAD–MS and NMR. Tentative identification of new compounds
and information on the reaction pathways are also provided.
2003; Sarni-Manchado, Fulcrand, Souquet, Cheynier,
&
Moutounet, 1996; Schwarz & Winterhalter, 2003) or hydroxycin-
namic acids (Blanco-Vega, López-Bellido, Alía-Robledo, & Her
mosín-Gutiérrez, 2011; Quijada-Morín, Dangles, Rivas-Gonzalo, &
Escribano-Bailón, 2010; Schwarz, Wabnitz, & Winterhalter, 2003).
High conversion rates were reported for the former reactions on
the basis of peak areas at 280 nm or 506–510 nm after HPLC sepa-
ration (Blanco-Vega et al., 2011; Hakansson, Pardon, Hayasaka, de
Sa, & Herderich, 2003; Schwarz & Winterhalter, 2003). However,
the low recoveries after purification suggest that the reaction
yields were in fact lower. This may be due to the lack of suitable
calibration standards and/or to anthocyanin degradation, as
described in other studies. Indeed, numerous degradation products
of Mv3G have been described and some of them formally identified
(Furtado, Figueiredo, Chaves das Neves, & Pina, 1993; Hrazdina,
1970; Hrazdina & Franzese, 1974; Lopes et al., 2007) but they have
not been quantified in the reaction media. Quantitative analysis of
the reaction using chromatographic methods would require cali-
bration using standard compounds, many of which are unstable
and/or not commercially available. Quantitative 1H Nuclear Mag-
netic Resonance (qHNMR), enabling quantitative determination
of molecules in complex solutions without the need for identical
pure reference standards (Pauli, Gödecke, Jaki, & Lankin, 2012;
Simmler, Napolitano, McAlpine, Chen, & Pauli, 2014), appears a
suitable alternative for accurate quantification of reagents and
products in complex reaction media, enabling in situ reaction mon-
itoring and determination of reaction yields (Do, Olivier, Salisbury,
& Wager, 2011).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Chemicals and samples
2.1.1. Chemicals
All solvents were of HPLC quality and all chemicals of p.a. grade.
Methanol (CH3OH), acetonitrile (CH3CN), hydrochloric acid (HCl)
and formic acid (HCO2H) were purchased from VWR Prolabo (Fon-
tenay sous Bois. France). VG, 2,4,6-trihydroxybenzaldehyde and
syringic acids were purchased from Sigma (Saint-Louis, MO,
USA). Mv3G chloride was purchased from Extrasynthèse (Genay,
France). All deuterated solvents were purchased from Euriso-top,
France. Certified (traceCert) gallic acid and dimethylsulfone
(DMS) were obtained from Fluka Analytical, Switzerland. Purified
deionised water (MilliQ purification system, Millipore, France)
was used for the preparation of all solutions.
2.2. Sample preparation
For UPLC–DAD–MS analysis, model solutions (Mv3G 1–4 mM,
VG to Mv3G molar ratios (1:2, 1:1, 2:1) were prepared in different
CH3CN/H2O or CH3OH/H2O mixtures (from 100/0 to 20/80). For
NMR analysis, Mv3G (2–5 mg) was dissolved in the following sol-
vent mixtures: CD3CN/H2O, CD3CN/D2O, CD3OD/H2O or CD3OD/
D2O, 50/50 V/V. Stock solutions (ꢀ100 mM) of VG were prepared
in either CD3CN or CD3OD. The concentration of both solutions
was determined by qNMR. Aliquots of VG solutions were added
to Mv3G to reach the desired molar ratio of VG to Mv3G. An appro-
priate volume of CD3CN or CD3OD was then added to reach a 70/30
V/V ratio of organic solvent to H2O (or D2O). The pH of the mixture
was adjusted with concentrated HCl to the desired value and incu-
bations were carried out at different temperatures (from 25 to
45 °C). The solutions were analyzed by UPLC–DAD–MS and/or
NMR at regular intervals until completion of the reaction.
The aim of our work was to optimize the formation of
phenylpyranoanthocyanins in wine-like model solution model
solution, using formation of guaiacylpyranomalvidin 3-O-
glucoside (GpyranoMv3G) (Fig. 1) from Mv3G and vinylguaiacol
2.3. UHPLC–MS/MS analysis
Chromatographic runs were performed on a Waters Acquity
UPLC–DAD system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), on an Acquity
BEH C18 column (150 mm length, 1 mm internal diameter,
1.7 lm particle size; Waters) at 35 °C following other procedures
(Lambert et al., 2015; Vallverdú-Queralt, Verbaere, Meudec,
Cheynier, & Sommerer, 2015). The mobile phase consisted of
H2O/HCO2H (99/1, V/V) (solvent A) and CH3OH/HCO2H (99/1, V/
V) (solvent B). The flow rate was 0.08 mL/min. The elution program
was as follows: isocratic with 2% B (1 min), 2–30% B (1–10 min),
isocratic with 30% B (10–12 min), 30–75% B (12–25 min), 75–90%
Fig. 1. Structure of GpyranoMv3G.