Table 1. One-Pot Generation/Cross-Coupling of a
1,2-Diboraethane with Aryl Electrophilesa
Figure 1
equivalent.
. Hydroborated intermediate as a 1,2-ethane dianion
the catalyzed diboration of ethene, the reductive coupling
of iodomethylpinacolborane with various metals, and the
hydrogenation of the alkynyl 1,2-dibora substrates. However,
each of these protocols utilizes chemically equivalent boron
species, effectively eliminating the possibility of selective
reaction at one boron center.
The 1,2-dibora intermediate from potassium vinyltri-
fluoroborate, on the other hand, can be differentially reacted
and therefore serves as a new linchpin building block for
the linkage of two different electrophilic partners. Herein
we report a comprehensive examination of the unique
applications of this protocol, demonstrating its utility as a
linker to connect aryl, heteroaryl, and alkenyl electrophiles,
generating a diverse library of ethyl-bridged subunits via
sequential processes.
Initially, we examined the scope and limitations of this
one-pot generation/cross-coupling of the 1,2-diboraethane
with a variety of aryl electrophiles (Table 1). After hydrobo-
ration of potassium vinyltrifluoroborate with 9-BBN in THF,
the resulting dibora intermediate was subjected to a variety
of electrophiles using the conditions previously optimized
for the chemoselective cross-coupling of the trialkylborane
moiety [2 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 3 mol % of DavePhos,6 and
3 equiv of KF].1a After the reaction was stirred at rt
overnight, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and each was
subjected to conditions optimized for the cross-coupling of
primary alkyltrifluoroborates with aryl chlorides [4 mol %
of RuPhos,7 3 equiv of K2CO3, and 10:1 toluene/H2O (0.2
M)].8
A variety of chloride and bromide electrophiles were
tolerated under these conditions including those containing
ketones, aldehydes, nitriles, and esters. Specifically, all
combinations of electron-rich and electron-poor electrophiles
underwent reaction to generate the corresponding cross-
coupled products in good yield. The system also proved
tolerant of sterically hindered substrates, generating the
product in only slightly reduced yield (Table 1, entry 7).
Additionally, the reaction proved to be scaleable to 5 mmol
(Table 1, entry 4). Of note, the second cross-coupling step
of each example proceeded readily without the need of
additional Pd(OAc)2.
a General conditions: RBF3K (1.0 equiv), 9-BBN (1.0 equiv), and THF
(0.25 M) followed by Pd(OAc)2 (2 mol %), DavePhos (3 mol %), Ar1-X
(1.0 equiv), and KF (3 equiv), rt, overnight. After solvent removal, RuPhos
(4 mol %), Ar2-X (1.0 equiv), K2CO3 (3 equiv), and 10:1 toluene/H2O (0.25
M), 24 h, 80 °C. b Reaction scaled to 5 mmol.
1-Bromo-3,5-dimethoxybenzene was then chosen as a
model electrophile to probe the system’s tolerance of a
variety of heteroaryl halide substrates (Table 2). Again,
subjecting vinyltrifluoroborate to the hydroboration/cross-
coupling sequence with the optimized conditions, the fully
elaborated products were obtained in excellent yield over
the three-step process with pyridine, pyrimidine, isoquinoline,
furan, and thiophene derivatives.
Because of the ubiquity of heterocycles in many biologi-
cally active molecules, we also investigated whether two
heterocycles could be linked via this diboraethane subunit.
A literature search shows various conditions for the cross-
(4) (a) Colberg, J. C.; Rane, A.; Vaquer, J.; Soderquist, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 6065. (b) Wrackmeyer, B.; Schanz, H.-J. Collect.
Czech. Chem. Commun. 1997, 62, 1254.
(5) (a) Dang, L.; Zhao, H.; Lin, Z.; Marder, T. B. Organometallics 2008,
27, 1178. (b) Ali, H. A.; Goldberg, I.; Srebnik, M. Organometallics 2001,
20, 3962. (c) Eisch, J. J.; Kotowicz, B. W. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 761.
(d) Iverson, C. N.; Smith, M. R. Organometallics 1997, 16, 2757.
(6) 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2′-(N,N-dimethylamino)biphenyl.
(7) 2-Dicyclohexylphosphino-2′6′-diisopropoxy-1,1′-biphenyl.
(8) Dreher, S. D.; Lim, S.-E.; Sandrock, D. L.; Molander, G. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, DOI: 10.1021/jo900152n.
2370
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 11, 2009