Scheme 4. Synthesis of Neuraminic Acid Derivatives 22, 23, and N-Acetylneuraminic Acid Methyl Ester 24
that this cyclization should be reversible. The final acetal
cleavage could be achieved under acidic conditions. For a
similar derivative, Banwell et al. employed HCl in metha-
nol.14 We obtained good results using Amberlyst-15 in
methanol at 40 °C. The mixture of the esters 9 and 10 was
converted to the neuraminic acid analogue 11 with a methoxy
group in position 4 and a short side chain in an overall yield
of 3% starting from 1,2-oxazine 4. No attempts to optimize
this sequence have been made.
cleavage. This reactivity was ideal for the N-acetylation
leading directly to 1,2-oxazinane 17 in good yield without
any selectivity problems. Additionally, it was observed that
by decreasing the amount of catalyst in order to slow down
the speed of the reaction for easier monitoring by TLC, an
increasing amount of an 1,2-oxazin-4-one was isolated, which
apparently resulted from the enol formed by O-debenzylation
before reduction of the enol ether double bond. The
dependence of the product ratio on the amount of catalyst
cannot be fully explained yet and will be discussed in more
detail elsewhere.16,17 The N-O bonds of N-acetylated 1,2-
oxazinane derivatives 16 and 17 were cleaved with samarium
diiodide in excellent yields. The conversion of the resulting
aminoalcohols 18 and 19 to the required aldehydes was
achieved by Dess-Martin oxidation which led to better
results than Swern oxidation. After addition of lithiated
methoxyallene and ozonolysis the R-hydroxyesters 20 and
21 were formed in moderate yields over three steps (dr ca.
1:1). Dess-Martin oxidation to the corresponding R-ke-
toesters followed by acetal cleavage provided N-acetyl-
neuraminic acid derivatives 22 and 23 in moderate yields
over two steps. Similar R-ketoesters have been deprotected
using HCl/MeOH18 or HF.19 Here, the acetal cleavage was
performed with Amberlyst-15 in methanol. Derivative 22,
bearing a methoxy group in position 4, was obtained in an
overall yield of 19% over ten steps and derivative 23 with
the benzyloxy group in 11% yield over nine steps. Under
transfer hydrogenation conditions with cyclohexene, benzy-
After this proof of principle, we applied the strategy to
the synthesis of neuraminic acid derivatives with a complete
9-carbon backbone (Scheme 4) starting from the D-arabinose
derived nitrone 12,15 which is easily accessible from D-
mannitol. To introduce different substituents in position 4,
methoxy- and benzyloxyallene were used for the synthesis.
The methoxy-substituted 1,2-oxazine 13 has been prepared
before,7 but the yield could be improved to 89% by slight
variations of the original procedure. Partial hydrogenolysis
and acetylation led to 1,2-oxazine 15 and 1,2-oxazinane 16
in analogy to derivative 4, but gratifyingly the yields were
considerably higher. The hydrogenation of the enol ether
double bond of 15 was smoothly achieved with a diastereo-
selectivity of 93:7 (1H NMR, crude), giving pure 1,2-
oxazinane 16 after column chromatography. Benzyloxy-
substituted precursor 14 was also prepared from nitrone 12
in good yield and excellent diastereoselectivity. We were
wondering which functional group of 14 (enol ether moiety,
O-benzyl, or N-benzyl group) would be reduced first during
hydrogenation, assuming that the N-O bond cleavage would
still be the slowest step. When using 30 mol % of Pd/C in
methanol, the hydrogenolysis of the N-benzyl group and the
reduction of the double bond was faster than O-benzyl
(16) Bressel, B. Ph.D. Dissertation, Freie Universita¨t Berlin, 2008.
(17) As the rate of hydrogenation generally increases with the amount
of starting material and high amounts of catalyst are necessary to achieve
good yields of the desired product 17, up-scaling of this partial hydro-
genolysis is limited. If the reaction is too fast, it is not possible to stop it
before O-debenzylation and N-O cleavage occur.
(12) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 1651–1660.
(13) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155–4156.
(14) Banwell, M.; De Savi, C.; Hockless, D.; Watson, K. Chem.
Commun. 1998, 645–646.
(18) Kang, S. H.; Choi, H.; Kim, J. S.; Youn, J.-H. Chem. Commun.
2000, 227–228.
(19) (a) Liu, K.-G.; Yan, S.; Wu, Y.-L.; Yao, Z.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 6758–6763. (b) Liu, K.-G.; Yan, S.; Wu, Y.-L.; Yao, Z.-H. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 2269–2272.
(15) Dondoni, A.; Franco, S.; Junquera, F.; Mercha´n, F.; Merino, P.;
Tejero, T. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2537–2550.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009
529