2-O-Iodoacetyl protected glycosyl iodides (9∼12) were
readily synthesized from the O-acetyl glycosyl bromide or
chloride via carbohydrate cyclic ketene acetal intermediates
as shown in Table 1. Treatment of the glycosyl halides 1∼4
glycosyl iodides 9∼12 as shown in Table 1. Glucosyl iodide
derivative 9 was synthesized in 87% yield over two steps
from the commercially available glucosyl bromide 1 (entry
1). Similarly, galactosyl iodide 10 and mannosyl iodide 11
were synthesized in 86% and 81% yields from galactosyl
bromide 2 and mannosyl chloride 3, respectively (entries 2
and 3). Maltosyl iodide 12 was synthesized in 62% yield
from maltosyl bromide precursor 49 which was readily
available from the treatment of octa-O-acetyl-R-D-maltoside
with 33% hydrogen bromide in AcOH (entry 4). Therefore,
this synthetic procedure can be used with readily available
monosaccharides and oligosaccharides.
Table 1. Synthesis of 2-O-Iodoacetyl-glycosyl Iodide
The stability of 2-O-iodoacetyl-R-D-glycopyranosyl iodide
derivatives is greatly dependent on the type of sugar. The
order of stability for glycosyl iodides is as follows: glucosyl
iodide 9 > galactosyl iodide 10 ≈ maltosyl iodide 12 >
mannosyl iodide 11. Especially, glucosyl iodide 9 is quite
stable and can be stored for 5 months in the dark at room
temperature or over one year at -18 °C. However, under
concentrated conditions, mannosyl iodide 11 is so unstable
that it has to be used for glycosylation without purification.
Under the experimental conditions in Table 1, only
R-glycosyl iodides were obtained without any trace of their
ꢀ-anomers; this was verified by extensive NMR experiments
and NOE measurements. The anomeric protons H-1 of
compounds 9, 10, 11, and 12 show the chemical shifts of
6.96, 7.03, 6.72, and 6.90 ppm, respectively.10 Upon irradia-
tion of H-2 of the R-glucosyl iodide 9 in a selective 1D NOE
experiment,11 strong interactions were observed with the
anomeric proton H-1 (NOE 3.5%), the 1,3-diaxial proton H-4
(2.4%), and transdiaxial H-3 (1.1%), which suggested an
R-configuration of the anomeric proton as shown in Figure
1. In addition, irradiation of the anomeric proton H-1 resulted
in no detectable NOE signal except those of neighboring H-2.
a Yields are obtained over two steps from I-1
8
with AgClO4 in anhydrous benzene at room temperature
for 1 h yielded the ketene acetals 5∼8 in 60∼90% yields.
Unexpectedly, we found that carbohydrate ketene acetals
5∼8 showed good stability to water during workup. They
could easily be purified by filtration through Celite to remove
AgBr and finally washed with water to remove the residual
AgClO4, ammonium salts, and other water-soluble impurities.
NMR analysis of these products indicated that no additional
purification was necessary.
Figure 1. NOE measurements for ꢀ-glucosyl iodide 9 in toludene-
d8 at 298 K.
A detailed plausible mechanism for the formation of
glycosyl iodides is depicted in Scheme 1. Reaction of
electron-rich ketene acetal12 with iodine would give a
dioxocarbenium ion 13. A nucleophilic ring opening of a
dioxocarbenium ion 13 by an iodide first gives ꢀ-glycosyl
The ketene acetals 5∼8 reacted with iodine in the presence
of 4 Å MS in benzene at ambient temperature to afford the
(7) (a) Schmid, U.; Waldmann, H. Liebigs Ann./Relc. 1997, 2573–2577.
(b) Tanaka, H.; Sakamoto, H.; Sano, A.; Nakamura, S.; Nakajima, M.;
Hashimoto, S. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1259–1260. (c) Caputo, R.; Kunz,
H.; Mastroianni, D.; Palumbo, G.; Pedatella, S.; Solla, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 314, 7–3150.
(9) Brauns, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1929, 51, 1820–1831.
(10) J1,2 values of H-1 at 9, 10, and 12 are 4.3 Hz, which suggests
R-anomer. H-1 of 11 shows a broad single peak.
(11) Stott, K.; Keeler, J.; Shaka, Q. N.; Van, A. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1997,
125, 302–324.
(8) (a) Paulsen, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1982, 21, 184–201. (b) Ness,
R. K.; Fletcher, H. G.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73, 296–
300. (c) Hanessian, S.; Banoub, J. Carbohyd. Res. 1975, 44, C14–Cl7.
(12) McElvain, S. M. Chem. ReV. 1949, 45, 453–492.
610
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 3, 2009