development of a Wacker-type procedure for alkyne oxida-
tion would not only expand the scope of the Wacker reaction
but also pose an interesting mechanistic question. Further-
more, the 1,2-diketones, oxidation products of alkynes, are
very important structural moieties in numerous biologically
interesting compounds8 and are broadly utilized for construc-
tion of complex structures in organic synthesis.9 Although
several methods have been reported for the oxidation of
alkynes,10 these reactions are still suffering from drawbacks
such as harsh conditions, narrow substrate scope, low yield,
and/or chemoselectivity. Thus, developing a new and efficient
protocol for clean catalytic oxidation of alkynes is still highly
desirable. In this communication, we report the Wacker-type
oxidation of alkynes, which affords 1,2-diketones using
molecular oxygen as the stoichiometric oxidant under mild
conditions.
We launched our efforts to develop the Wacker-type
oxidation of alkynes under typical conditions employed for
alkenes. Reaction of 1,2-diphenylethyne in DMF/H2O in the
presence of a catalytic amount of PdCl2 and CuCl2 afforded
benzyl 2a in 21% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Despite the modest
yield obtained, the initial test result was quite encouraging
since it attested the feasibility of Wacker-type oxidation of
alkynes. An extensive screening of the reaction parameters
indicated that the catalysts, cocatalysts, oxidants, and solvents
all play critical roles on the reaction efficiency. The best
result was obtained by treating 1,2-diphenylethyne with 5
mol % of PdBr2 and 10 mol % of CuBr2 in dioxane/H2O
under 1 atm of oxygen atmosphere, with a yield of 97% for
2a. It should be noted that using air in place of oxygen could
also give good yield of the product (Table 1, entry 16). Next,
the practical utility of this oxidation process was evaluated,
and up to 91% yield could be achieved on a scale of 60
mmol 1a (Table 1, entry 22). Another feature of the reaction
was that the use of molecular oxygen as the oxidant was
essential for high conversion, as demonstrated by the fact
that the yields decreased when other oxidants were employed
(Table 1, entries 17-21).
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry Pd(OAc02 cocatalyst
oxidant
solvent
yieldb
1
PdCl2
CuCl2
O2
DMF/H2O
DMF/H2O
DMF/H2O
21%
0%
72%
2
Pd(OAc)2 Cu(OAc)2 O2
3
PdBr2
PdBr2
-
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
-
O2
O2
O2
-
4
Dioxane/H2O 97%
5
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
THF/H2O
0%
6
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
PdBr2
0%c
8%
7
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
-
8
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
O2
air
48%
72%
52%
15%
15%
28%
0%
18%
76%
89%
30%
12%
18%
14%
91%
9
DMF/H2O
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20d
21
22e
DME/H2O
EA/H2O
iPrOH/H2O
MeCN/H2O
CH3NO2/H2O
Acetone/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
benzoquinone Dioxane/H2O
PhI(OAc)2
H2O2
TBHP
DMSO
O2
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
Dioxane/H2O
a 0.2 mmol 1a, 5 mol % catalyst, 10 mol % cocatalyst. b Isolated yield.
c Deoxybenzoin 3 was achieved in 30% yield. d TBHP: tert-butyl
hydroperoxide. e 60 mmol 1a was used.
functional groups, including halide, ketone, aldehyde, nitro,
benzylic C-H bond, trifluoromethyl, ester, etc., could be
tolerated. Apart from the diarylalkynes, alkynes bearing one
or two aliphatic substituents were also suitable substrates
under standard oxidation conditions, affording the corre-
sponding diketone products in moderate to good yields (Table
2, entries 9-12). Although alkyne with a fused aromatic ring
showed lower reactivity under the optimal conditions, product
2g was isolated in high yield at elevated temperature (Table
2, entry 6).
It is remarkable that the aryl bromide was a compatible
substrate in this transformation given its important synthetic
application, as C-Br of the product could be further
functionalized (Table 2, entry 2). It was also mechanistically
interesting, as it is well-known that the C-Br bond is quite
sensitive under a Pd(0)/(II) catalytic cycle. Furthermore,
when alcohol and aldehyde, usually reactive under tradi-
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we began
to examine the scope of this new Wacker-type oxidation of
alkynes. As shown in Table 2, this transformation was highly
efficient for a broad scope of substrates, wherein various
(5) (a) Hegedus, L. S.; Allen, G. F.; Bozell, J. J.; Waterman, E. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 5800–5807. (b) Hosokawa, T.; Takano, M.; Kuroki,
Y.; Murahashi, S.-I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6643–6646. (c) Larock,
R. C.; Hightower, T. R.; Hasvold, L. A.; Peterson, K. P. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 3584–3585. (d) Lei, A.; Liu, G.; Lu, X. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67,
974–980. (e) Bar, G. L. J.; Lloyd-Jones, G. C.; Booker-Milburn, K. I. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7308–7309. (f) Yip, K.-T.; Yang, M.; Law, K.-L.;
Zhu, N.-Y.; Yang, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3130–3131. (g) Zhang,
Z.; Tan, J.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 173–175.
(10) For representative alkyne oxidation methods, see: (a) Zhu, Z.;
Espenson, J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7728–7732. (b) Dayan, S.; Ben-
David, I.; Rozen, S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8816–8818. (c) Murray, R. W.;
Singh, M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5076–5080. (d) Wolfe, S.; Ingold, C. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7755–7757. (e) Wan, Z.; Jones, C. D.;
Mitchell, D.; Pu, J. Y.; Zhang, T. Y. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 826–828. (f)
Yusubov, M. S.; Zholobova, G. A.; Vasilevsky, S. F.; Tretyakov, E. V.;
Knight, D. W. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1607–1610. (g) Giraud, A.; Provot,
O.; Peyrat, J.-F.; Alami, M.; Brion, J.-D. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7667–
7673. (h) Mousset, C.; Provot, O.; Hamze, A.; Bignon, J.; Brion, J.-D.;
Alami, M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4287–4294. (i) Yusubov, M. S.;
Filimonov, V. D. Synthesis 1991, 131–132. (j) Yusubov, M. S.; Kras-
nokutskaya, E. A.; Vasilyeva, V. P.; Filimonov, V. D.; Chi, K. W. Bull.
Korean Chem. Soc. 1995, 16, 86–88. (k) Chi, K.-W.; Yusubov, M. S.;
Filimonov, V. D. Synth. Commun. 1994, 24, 2119–2122. (l) Che, C.-M.;
Yu, W.-Y.; Chan, P.-M.; Cheng, W.-C.; Peng, S.-M.; Lau, K.-C.; Li, W.-
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11380–11392.
(6) (a) Fix, S. R.; Brice, J. L.; Stahl, S. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
41, 164–166. (b) Timokhin, V. I.; Anastasi, N. R.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 12996–12997. (c) Brice, J. L.; Harang, J. E.; Timokhin,
V. I.; Anastasi, N. R.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2868–
2869. (d) Timokhin, V. I.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17888–
17893. (e) Rogers, M. M.; Kotov, V.; Chatwichien, J.; Stahl, S. S. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 4331–4334. (f) Liu, G.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 6328–6335.
(7) For Pd-catalyzed cleavage reaction of alkynes, see: Wang, A.; Jiang,
H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5030–5031.
(8) Maurya, R.; Singh, R.; Deepak, M.; Handa, S. S.; Yadav, P. P.;
Mishra, P. K. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 915–920.
(9) Deng, X.; Mani, N. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 269–272.
1842
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 8, 2009