T. A. Stammers et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 6879–6885
6881
O
potency was observed relative to 1, a cell culture potency of
5.4 mM with no significant cytotoxicity (TC50 >100 mM) repre-
sented a noteworthy improvement for the anthranilic acid series.
Once again, the (ortho-trifluoromethyl)phenoxy analogue in the
4-substitued anthranilic acid series 19 failed to show such a bene-
fit. The lipophilic ortho-trifluoromethoxy analogue 10 also con-
ferred a similar benefit for cell culture potency (EC50 = 7.0 mM).
Among the non-aromatic replacements of the phenoxy group,
cyclopentyloxy analogue 11 was the only example that achieved
comparable potency (the binding of the lipophilic LHS groups of
9 and 11 is discussed in Fig. 3).
O
HO
O
OH
+ O
O
11
a, b
c, d
N
O
NH3Cl
20
21
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) cyclopentanol (2.2 equiv), PPh3 (2.2 equiv),
DEAD (2.2 equiv), THF, 0.5 h, rt; (b) 10% Pd/C, H2, MeOH/EtOAc (1:1), 3 h, rt then
treatment with 1 N HCl in Et2O; (c) 4-Me-phenylsulfonyl chloride (1 equiv),
anhydrous pyridine, 80 °C, 1h; (d) NaOH (10 N aq, 10 equiv), DMSO, 50 °C, 2 h.
to improve cell culture potency. The 4-bromo-2-fluorophenylsulf-
onamide substituent7 present in the 5- (22) and 4-substituted
(27) anthranilic acid analogues served as references, both com-
pounds had comparable enzymatic potency but were inactive in
the cell-based replicon assay (Table 2). Methylation of the nitrogen
atom of the sulfonamide resulted in a complete loss of potency
(data not show), potentially due to unfavourable changes to the
conformation of the inhibitor. Replacement of the sulfonamide
with an N-alkylamide has been exemplified in the previously re-
ported thiophene carboxylic acid class of TP-2 inhibitors.15 Alkyl
substitution of the nitrogen atom was essential to lock the amide
in the s-cis bound-like conformation and retain activity. Increasing
steric volume of the nitrogen substituent from N-H ? N-Me ? N-
iPr led to a progressive improvement in potency (data not shown)
consistent with what was reported in the thiophene series.15 The
initial N-iPr amide inhibitors synthesized with the 4-bromo-2-fluo-
rophenyl substituent (23 and 28) were fivefold less potent than the
corresponding sulfonamides 22 and 27 and did not exhibit activity
in the replicon assay. The trans-4-methylcyclohexyl15 substituted
analogues 24 and 29 remained twofold less potent in the biochem-
ical assay compared to 22 and 27, however, weak inhibition was
measured in the cell culture assay. The SAR around the cyclohexyl
group was found to be highly restrictive. Removal of the trans-4-
methyl group resulted in a 30-fold loss of activity (data not
shown). Alternatives to the trans-4-methyl were generally less po-
tent, the best tolerated examples included the ethyl (25 and 30)
and trifluoromethyl (26 and 31) analogues. A comparison of the
binding mode of sulfonamide 22 with an N-iPr amide 24 is shown
in Figure 2. The key pharmacophoric interactions described in Fig-
ure 1 are well conserved as seen in the overlay.
The phenoxy substituted inhibitors in Table 1 were prepared
using a parallel synthesis approach described in our previous com-
munication.7 Cyclopentyloxy inhibitor 11 was prepared as shown
in Scheme 1. A Mitsunobu reaction was used to install the cyclo-
pentyl ring on 5-hydroxy-2-nitrobenzoic acid 20. Subsequently,
the nitro group was reduced to provide intermediate 21. Sulfonyla-
tion and saponification of 21 produced 11.
Simultaneous to our exploration of the phenoxy substituent,
modifications to the sulfonamide group were pursued in an effort
The synthesis of the sulfonamide inhibitors 22 and 27 was de-
scribed in our previous communication.7 The N-iPr amide inhibi-
tors from Table 2 were prepared from the phenoxy substituted
anthranilic acid methyl ester intermediates 32 and 337 as shown
in Scheme 2. Treatment with methoxypropene and sodium triacet-
oxyborohydride16 afforded N-iPr anilines 34 and 35. The synthesis
of 5-phenoxyanthranilic acid inhibitors 23–26 and 4-phenoxy-
anthranilic acid inhibitors 28–31 was completed by acylation and
saponification of the corresponding N-iPr-anilines 34 and 35.
Combinations of the best phenoxy substituents from Table 1 with
the trans-4-methylcyclohexyl-N-iPr carboxamide were explored
and our observations are summarized in Table 3. Gratifyingly, the
combination of the N-alkylamide linker with the 5-cyclopentoxy
Figure 2. Overlay of NS5B co-structures of sulfonamide 22 (white) and N-iPr-amide
24 (orange).
I482
A486
V485
group proved to be additive for cell culture potency (36, EC50
=
L489
L419
1.0 mM). Surprisingly, the corresponding 4-cyclopentyloxy
analogue 37 was inactive. The (ortho-trifluoromethyl)phenoxy
analogue also demonstrated an additive SAR resulting in the first
inhibitor in the series with sub-micromolar cell culture potency
(38, EC50 = 0.64 mM). The corresponding (ortho-trifluoromethyl)
phenoxy in the isomeric 4-substituted anthranilic acid series 39
failed to provide a comparable improvement in potency. The
trajectory of the phenoxy group from the 4-position of the anthra-
nilic acid did not appear to allow for the same beneficial interactions
observed for 36 and 38. All approaches to improve potency in the
4-substituted series failed and further optimization efforts focused
on the 5-substituted anthranilic acid series.
L497
M423
Figure 3. Overlay of NS5B co-structures comparing how the cyclopentyloxy 36
(white) ortho-trifluoromethylphenoxy 38 (magenta), and phenoxy 24 (blue) groups
fill the shallow lipophilic pocket on the LHS of TP-2.