de Lijser et al.
SCHEME 7. Expected Products from Reactions of
N-Methoxybenziminoyl Radicals
It is unclear why N-alkoximinoyl radicals react differently
as compared to N-alkyliminoyl radicals. One possible scenario
would be that oxime ethers are formed but react on under the
conditions of the reaction to form the nitrile product (Scheme
9). To find out if these follow-up reactions were occurring,
oxime ether 1d was reacted with Bu3SnH and AIBN in benzene
under reflux. Although small amounts of benzonitrile were
detected, the conversion of the oxime ether was at most 5%;
therefore it can be concluded that this reaction is of no
significance and cannot be used to explain the absence of the
oxime ether in the product mixture. The most likely explanation
at this point is that the ꢀ-scission pathway that leads to the
formation of alkoxy radicals is energetically more favorable than
that of similar alkyl radicals. This may simply be a result of a
difference in bond dissociation energies; the N-O BDE in
higher concentrations of Bu3SnH (0.25 M) or by using toluene
as the solvent were unsuccessful, suggesting that the ꢀ-scission
pathway is a very efficient process. However, the other expected
product(s) from the ꢀ-scission pathway (alcohol 4a and aldehyde
5a; Scheme 7) could not be detected by gas chromatography
(due to volatility issues) and therefore it cannot be concluded
(at this point) that this pathway actually takes place.
acetaldoxime is 49.7 kcal mol-1 whereas the typical C-N BDE
11,12
is upward of 70 kcal mol-1
.
When the reactions were carried out in air-saturated benzene
the results were very similar to those in the argon-purged
solutions (Table 2). Again, all compounds give good (∼80%)
to excellent (∼100%) material balances with the exception of
2d. The reason for this behavior is unclear; the results are
different in the absence and in the presence of air, which
suggests that it may be due to follow up reactions with oxygen
although it is unclear why only one of these substrates would
be susceptible to this effect. At this point we have not further
investigated this behavior.
Estimation of the Rate Constants for ꢀ-Scission in
N-Alkoxybenziminoyl Radicals. On the basis of the results
listed in Tables 1 and 2, it can be concluded that N-alkoxyben-
ziminoyl radicals undergo a ꢀ-scission to yield benzonitrile and
an alkoxy radical. Since the product from the reduction pathway
(hydrogen atom transfer, HAT, from Bu3SnH) is not observed,
it seems reasonable to assume that the ꢀ-scission pathway is
significantly faster than the HAT pathway. Since there are no
reports on the rate constant for either the hydrogen atom transfer
or the ꢀ-scission reactions in iminoyl radicals, we have
attempted to use our data together with some literature sources
for an estimate of these numbers.
Similar results were obtained for N-ethoxybenziminoyl
chloride (2b) and N-t-butoxybenziminoyl chloride (2c). Other
than formation of benzonitrile, no direct evidence was found
for the ꢀ-scission pathway, since the expected products from
the radical fragment in these reactions (methanol, 4a; formal-
dehyde, 5a; ethanol, 4b; acetaldehyde, 5b; and t-butanol, 4c,
respectively) could not be identified with the available experi-
mental techniques. However, using N-benzyloxybenziminoyl
chloride (2d) under similar conditions led to the formation of
benzonitrile (3), benzyl alcohol (4d) and benzaldehyde (5d).
The latter two products confirm the suspected ꢀ-scission
pathway. Similarly, reacting N-octyloxybenziminoyl chloride
(2e) yielded benzonitrile (3), 1-octanol (4e) and octanal (5e) as
expected. In general, the material balances in these experiments
are acceptable. It is known that tin radicals can react with
carbon-nitrogen double bonds,9 which may explain the lower
material balances for compounds 2a-c. Analysis of the mixtures
by GC-MS suggested the formation of some products containing
tin (including tributyltin chloride and hexabutylditin), however
these were not isolated or quantified.
Comparing these results to those obtained by Wirth and
Ru¨chardt in their studies on N-alkyliminoyl radicals6h reveals
some significant differences. The reaction of N-benzylbenzimi-
noyl chloride in benzene resulted in the formation of benzonitrile
(76.5%), toluene (74.4%) and N-benzylbenzaldimine (10.1%).
Under similar conditions, N-octylbenziminoyl chloride reacted
to give only 2.4% (each) of benzonitrile and octane and 93.6%
of N-octylbenzaldimine. Other substrates (with the exception
of N-cinnamylbenziminoyl chloride) also reacted to yield the
imine product independent of the solvent (benzene, toluene,
xylene) or concentration of Bu3SnH, although the material
balance often was poor. In a separate study, Bringmann, Barton
and co-workers noted that reaction of an iminoyl chloride
derivative of a steroid with Bu3SnH resulted in the formation
of benzylamine (64%), suggesting that ꢀ-scission was not a
dominant pathway (Scheme 8).10
First, it must be noted that the product formation (products
and yields) is unaffected by the presence of oxygen. The
reactions of carbon-centered radicals with oxygen in solution
13,14
vary from 106 to 109 M-1 s-1
;
the “slow” reactions are
observed for stabilized radicals (e.g., benzylic) although other
resonance stabilized radicals have rate constants of 2 - 3 ×
13
108 M-1 s-1
.
A fast reaction of the N-alkoxybenziminoyl
radical with oxygen (kOx) would be competitive with the
ꢀ-scission pathway and it would likely lead to different products
or a diminished material balance. However, as seen from Tables
1 and 2, the material balances do not change significantly when
(11) Luo, Y.-R. Handbook of Bond Dissociation Energies in Organic
Compounds; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
(12) Although the BDE of the C-N bond in a typical imine is unknown, a
survey of different C-N BDE values suggest that most are in the range of 70-
11
100 kcal mol-1
.
(13) For a listing of rate constants for the reactions of carbon-centered radicals
with O2 see: (a) Neta, P.; Huie, R. E.; Ross, A. B. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data
1990, 19, 413. (b) Howard, J. A.; Scaiano, J. C. In Landolt-Barnstein Numerical
Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology. New Series,
Group ll; Atomic and Molecular Physics; Hellwege, K.-H., Madelung, O., Eds.;
Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1984; Vol. 13, Part d.
(9) (a) McCarroll, A. J.; Walton, J. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000,
(14) (a) Sommeling, P. M.; Mulder, P.; Louw, R.; Avila, D. V.; Lusztyk, J.;
Ingold, K. U. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8361. (b) Alfassi, Z. B.; Marguet, S.;
Neta, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 8019. (c) Mertens, R.; von Sonntag, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1262. (d) Brown, C. E.; Neville, A. G.; Rayner,
D. M.; Ingold, K. U.; Lusztyk, J. Aust. J. Chem. 1995, 48, 363.
1868. (b) McCarroll, A. J.; Walton, J. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000,
2399.
(10) Barton, D. H. R.; Bringmann, G.; Lamotte, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979,
24, 2291.
1682 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 4, 2009