FIVE-MEMBERED 2,3-DIOXO HETEROCYCLES: LVII.
1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 1.22 s (9H, CMe3), 6.44 s
611
REFERENCES
(1H), 6.64 d (1H, 8-H, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.29–7.73 m (12H,
Harom), 12.57 s (1H, NH). 13C NMR spectrum, δC, ppm:
26.88 (Me), 44.44 (CMe3), 54.00 (CH), 115.25–135.37
(Carom), 153.00 (C3′=O), 153.69 (C2=O), 157.61 (C3),
157.87 (C2′), 209.52 (t-BuCO). Found, %: C 72.41;
H 5.28; N 12.00. C28H24N4O3. Calculated, %: C 72.40;
H 5.21; N 12.06.
1. Racheva, N.L., Belova, M.A., and Maslivets, A.N.,
Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2008, vol. 44, p. 582.
2. Tolmacheva, I.A., Mashevskaya, I.V., and Masli-
vets, A.N., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2002, vol. 38, p. 281.
3. Maslivets, A.N., Mashevskaya, I.V., Kol’tsova, S.V.,
Duvalov, A.V., and Feshin, V.P., Russ. J. Org. Chem.,
2002, vol. 38, p. 738.
X-Ray analysis of compound IIIb. Triclinic crys-
tals, C28H24N4O3·H2O, with the following unit cell pa-
rameters: a = 13.640(3), b = 11.573(2), c = 8.540(2) Å;
α = 73.94(3), β = 88.96(3), γ = 83.97(3)°; V =
1288.1(5) Å3; M 482.53; dcalc = 1.244 g/cm3; Z = 2;
space group P-1. The unit cell parameters and the set
of experimental reflections were measured on a Kuma
Diffraction KM-4 automatic four-circle diffractometer
(χ-geometry, monochromatized MoKα irradiation,
ω/2Θ scanning, 2Θ ≤ 50.2°). The crystals were weakly
reflecting. Among 4226 independent reflections, only
1071 were with I ≥ 2σ(I) (Rint = 0.0787). No correction
for absorption was introduced (μ = 0.085 mm–1). The
structure was solved by the direct method using SIR92
program [13], followed by a series of calculations of
electron density maps. The positions of hydrogen
atoms (except for those in the crystallization water
molecule, which were not localized) were determined
from the geometry considerations, and only their
positional parameters were refined by the least-squares
procedure. Full-matrix least-squares refinement of the
positions of non-hydrogen atoms was performed in
anisotropic approximation using SHELXL 97 software
[14] and was complete at R1 = 0.0840, wR2 = 0.2026
[for reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I)]; goodness of fit 0.800.
4. Mashevskaya, I.V., Kol’tsova, S.V., Duvalov, A.V., and
Maslivets, A.N., Khim. Geterotsikl. Soedin., 2000,
p. 1281.
5. Maslivets, A.N. and Bozdyreva, K.S., Khim. Geterotsikl.
Soedin., 2002, p. 1735.
6. Bozdyreva, K.S., Maslivets, A.N., and Aliev, Z.G.,
Mendeleev Commun., 2005, p. 163.
7. Bozdyreva, K.S., Smirnova, I.V., and Maslivets, A.N.,
Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2005, vol. 41, p. 1081.
8. Berezina, E.S., Koz’minykh, V.O., Idigov, N.M., Shirin-
kina, S.S., Koz’minykh, E.N., Makhmudov, R.R., and
Bukanova, E.V., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 2001, vol. 37,
p. 539.
9. Andreichikov, Yu.S., Maslivets, A.N., Smirnova, L.I.,
Krasnykh, O.P., Kozlov, A.P., and Perevozchikov, L.A.,
Zh. Org. Khim., 1987, vol. 23, p. 1534.
10. Zhungietu, R.I. and Rekhter, M.A., Izatin i ego proiz-
vodnye (Isatin and Its Derivatives), Kishinev: Shtiintsa,
1977, p. 228.
11. Terpetschnig, E., Ott, W., Kollenz, G., Peters, K.,
Peters, E.-M., and von Schnering, H.G., Monatsh.
Chem., 1988, vol. 119, p. 367.
12. Maslivets, A.N., Smirnova, L.I., Ivanenko, O.I., and
Andreichikov, Yu.S., Russ. J. Org. Chem., 1995, vol. 31,
p. 563.
13. Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., and Gua-
lardi, A., J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1993, vol. 26, p. 343.
This study was performed under financial support
by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project
no. 07-03-960366).
14. Sheldrick, G.M., SHELXL 97. Programs for Crystal
Structure Analysis, Gottingen, Germany: Univ. of Got-
tingen, 1998, p. 2332.
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY Vol. 44 No. 4 2008