N-(Cyanomethyl)pyrrolidinium triflate (CMPT, 6),14 an
acidic activator with extremely low nucleophilicity, was used
to activate the monomers. Reversed-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC)
analysis of the resultant 2mers showed that the yields
(96-98%) and diastereoselectivity (>99:1) were sufficient
for the synthesis of oligomers (Table 2).15
steric hindrance of the 2′-O-TBDMS groups. Use of a CPG
in the place of an HCP did not improve the results (entries
2 and 3).
To solve the problem of low coupling efficiency, we turned
our attention to the use of nucleophilic azoles, which have
been widely used as activators in the phosphoramidite
chemistry.17 We employed 5-benzylthio-1H-tetrazole (BTT
10),18 4,5-dicyanoimidazole (DCI, 11),19 and benzimidazo-
lium triflate (BIT, 8)20 to synthesize all-(Rp)-ASGSCSU 15
and found that the coupling efficiency was greatly improved
in all of these cases (entries 6-8). In particular, BIT 8 gave
15 with sufficient average coupling efficiency for the
synthesis of long oligomers (entry 8). The RP-HPLC profiles
of the resultant all-(Rp)-2′-O-TBDMS-protected ASGSCSU
4mers showed that the ratios of diastereoisomers obtained
by using 8, 10, or 11 were as high as that obtained by using
CMPT 6.15 To examine the diastereoselectivity of the
synthesis of each PS-linkage promoted by azole-type activa-
tors, (Sp)- and (Rp)-USU were synthesized by using BIT 8.
An RP-HPLC analysis showed that (Sp)- and (Rp)-2′-O-
TBDMS-USU were synthesized with dr of >99:1 (97% yield)
and 96:4 (98% yield), respectively.
Table 2. Synthesis of Dinucleoside Phosphorothioates 7a-da
entry monomer
productb
yield (%)c Rp/Spc
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(Rp)-3a
(Rp)-3b
(Rp)-3c
(Rp)-3d
(Sp)-3a
(Sp)-3b
(Sp)-3c
(Sp)-3d
(Sp)-USU (Sp)-7a
98
97
98
97
98
98
96
98
>1:99
>1:99
>1:99
>1:99
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
>99:1
(Sp)-CSU
(Sp)-ASU
(Sp)-7b
(Sp)-7c
(Sp)-GSU (Sp)-7d
(Rp)-USU (Rp)-7a
(Rp)-CSU (Rp)-7b
(Rp)-ASU (Rp)-7c
(Rp)-GSU (Rp)-7d
a CMPT 6 was used as activator. b Subscript “S” ) PS-linkage.
c Determined by RP-HPLC.
The fact that azole-type activators also afforded PS-ORNs
with high diastereoselectivity is rather surprising because
highly nucleophilic azole-type activators are known to
epimerize diastereopure acyclic phosphoramidites as well as
monocyclic oxazaphospholidines by repetitive nucleophilic
attacks upon the chiral phosphorus atoms, resulting in the
formation of phosphite triesters of low diastereopurity,14,16,21
whereas less-nucleophilic CMPT 6 is considered to activate
oxazaphospholidines only by N-protonation, without affecting
the chiral phosphorus atoms.14 Although the mechanism of
the highly diastereoselective formation of phosphites pro-
moted by azoles is still not clear, it may be attributed to the
configurational stability of the proline-derived bicyclic ox-
azaphospholidine ring structure.9
All-(Rp)-[US]9U 16 was then synthesized by using BIT 8
or N-(phenyl)imidazolium triflate (PhIMT) 9, which has been
reported as one of the best activators for the synthesis of
unmodified ORNs.20b We found that PhIMT 9 afforded 16
with excellent coupling efficiency (entry 10). All-(Sp)-[US]9U
(17) was also efficiently synthesized by using PhIMT 9 (entry
11). Although oligomers containing phosphodiester linkages
were observed as major byproducts12 due to incomplete
manual sulfurization, the desired all-(Rp)- and all-(Sp)-[US]9U
were generated in good yields and diastereoselectivity.15
After desilylation by TBAF, 16 and 17 were isolated by RP-
HPLC in 6 and 11% yields, respectively, and identified by
MALDI-TOF-MS.15
Given this result, we investigated the synthesis of stereo-
defined PS-ORNs. All-(Sp)- and all-(Rp)-[US]3U and ASG-
SCSU 4mers (Table 3, 12-15) were synthesized by using
Table 3. Synthesis of Stereodefined PS-ORNs 12-17a
entry
oligonucleotideb
activator coupling yield (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
all-(Sp)-[US]3U 12
all-(Rp)-[US]3U 13
all-(Rp)-[US]3U 13
all-(Sp)-ASGSCSU 14
all-(Rp)-ASGSCSU 15 CMPT 6
all-(Rp)-ASGSCSU 15 BTT 10
all-(Rp)-ASGSCSU 15 DCI 11
all-(Rp)-ASGSCSU 15 BIT 8
CMPT 6
CMPT 6
CMPT 6
CMPT 6
94
90
88
90
67
84
90
97
92
97
99
9
10
11
all-(Rp)-[US]9U 16
all-(Rp)-[US]9U 16
all-(Sp)-[US]9U 17
BIT 8
PhIMT 9
PhIMT 9
a HCP was used in entries 1 and 2, and CPG was used in entries 3-11.
b Subscript “S” ) PS-linkage. c Average coupling yields were determined
by RP-HPLC for 4mers 12-15, and by DMTr+ assay for 10mers 16, 17.
CMPT 6. However, an RP-HPLC analysis of the resultant
2′-O-TBDMS-protected 4mers showed that the average
coupling yields were not sufficient for the synthesis of long
oligomers (67-94%, entries 1-5). The coupling efficiency
for (Rp)-PS-linkages was lower than that for (Sp)-PS-
linkages; the difference in coupling efficiency between the
(Rp)- and (Sp)-monomers could be attributed to the chirality
of ribose.16 The lower coupling yields for the synthesis of
PS-ORNs compared to those for PS-ODNs9 are due to the
Stability of the resultant all-(Rp)- and all-(Sp)-[US]9U (16,
17) to snake venom phosphodiesterase (svPDE)22 and
(17) Beaucage, S. L.; Iyer, R. P. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2223–2311.
(18) Welz, R.; Mu¨ller, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 795–797.
(19) Vargeese, C.; Cater, J.; Yegge, J.; Krivjansky, S.; Settle, A.; Kropp,
E.; Peterson, K.; Pieken, W. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 1046–1050.
(20) (a) Hayakawa, Y.; Kataoka, M.; Noyori, R. J. Org. Chem. 1996,
61, 7996–7997. (b) Hayakawa, Y.; Kawai, R.; Hirata, A.; Sugimoto, J.;
Kataoka, M.; Sakakura, A.; Hirose, M.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
34, 8165–8176.
(14) Oka, N.; Wada, T.; Saigo, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8307–
8317.
(15) See the Supporting Information.
(16) Yu, D.; Kandimalla, E. R.; Roskey, A.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, L.; Chen,
J.; Agrawal, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 275–284.
(21) Stec, W. J.; Zon, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 5279–5282.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 4, 2009
969