Derivatives of 6,7-dimethyl-2,3-diphenylquinoxaline
671
injection of 1 cm3 of methanol, the color changed to yellow and
the solution was extracted with diethyl ether (3ꢂ100 cm3).
The combined extracts were dried over sodium sulfate and
evaporated. The crude reaction product was chromatographed
on silica gel. Elution of column with toluene gave yellow
fluorescent crystals. Recrystallization from 40 to 60ꢀC pe-
troleum ether afforded 0.286g (84%) 3. Mp 176ꢀC; 1H NMR
(200MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ ¼ 1.81 (s, 2-CH3), 2.21 (s, 7-CH3),
2.28 (s, 6-CH3), 2.46 (s, 1-CH3), 6.39–7.53 (m, 12H, aro-
matic) ppm; IR (KBr): ꢁꢀ¼ 3080, 2970, 2850, 2740, 1625,
1497, 1446, 1344cmꢁ1; UV (chloroform): lmax ¼ 233,
258 nm; MS (70 eV): m=z (%) ¼ 341 (Mþ 1, 20), 340 (Mþ,
47), 325 (100), 263 (48), 236 (24), 118 (31), 103 (24), 77 (28).
The mass fragmentation and elemental analysis
results of all compounds supported the suggested
structures. In all experiments, some 1 was recovered,
probably because of only partial reduction of 1 to 2,
or conversion of 2 to 1 by traces of the oxygen in-
troduced into the system during the handling of the
reaction reagents.
Experimental
Melting points were measured in open capillaries with an
Electrothermal IA 9100 melting point apparatus. IR spectra
were recorded on a Philips PU 9714 and Mattson 1000 FTIR
spectrometer in KBr pellets. The NMR spectra were deter-
mined on a Varian 200 MHz Gemini in CDCl3 with TMS as
internal standart. UV spectra were recorded with Philips PU
8700 UV=VIS spectrometer using chloroform. Mass spectra
were obtained with Shimadzu GC=MS QP 2000 A. Elemental
analyses (C, H, and N) were carried out using Perkin-Elmer
240 B microanalyzer; their results were in favourable agree-
ment with the calculated values. Column chromatography was
performed with silica gel 60 (70–230 mesh) purchased from
E. Merck. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was effected with
Eastman Kodak Chromagram 13181 silica gel sheets with
fluorescent indicator. Tetrahydrofuran was purified by reflux-
ing for at least 8 h over LiAlH4 under N2, and when needed
the solvent was refluxed for 2 h and the required amount was
redistilled immediately before use. All reactions involving
alkali-metal compounds were conducted in an atmosphere of
purified and dried Ar. For determining of completion time
of reduction, the reductive metallation of 1 on a preparative
scale was performed. Removal of weighed aliquots of the
solution during the reaction between 1 and sodium in tetrahy-
drofuran, quenching the aliquots in 1:1 ¼ water:methanol, and
titrating with standardized HCl, demonstrated that formation
of deep purple solution of the dianion 2 was completed after
18h.
rac-6,7-Dimethyl-2a,3-diphenylazetidino[1,2-a]quinoxaline
(4, C24H22N2)
1,2-Dichloroethane (0.194g, 2.0 mmol) was added to the dia-
nion solution prepared by the procedure described for com-
pound 3, after 8 h stirring, the color of this resulting solution
was yellow. The crude reaction product was isolated and chro-
matographed on silica gel. Elution with toluene gave yellow
1
fluorescent oily product, 0.138g (40%). H NMR (200 MHz,
CDCl3): ꢀ ¼ 2.17 (s, 7-CH3), 2.23 (s, 6-CH3), 3.10 (m, 2-CHa),
3.54 (m, 2-CHb), 3.92 (m, 1-CHa), 4.06 (m, 1-CHb), 6.56–
7.80 (m, 12H, aromatic) ppm; IR (KBr): ꢁꢀ¼ 3080, 2980,
2850, 2770, 1610, 1590, 1480, 1440, 1312cmꢁ1; UV (chlo-
roform): lmax ¼ 268, 328nm; MS (70 eV): m=z (%) ¼ 339
(Mþ 1, 44), 338 (Mþ, 100), 337 (Mꢁ 1, 87), 323 (43), 310
(89), 309 (85), 261 (92), 234 (84), 206 (37), 103 (38), 77 (23).
rac-7,8-Dimethyl-3a,4-diphenylpyrrolidino[1,2-a]-
quinoxaline (5,C25H24N2)
The reaction described above was repeated with 1,3-dichloro-
propane (0.225g, 2.0 mmol) for 6 h. Chromatography (silica=
toluene) of crude product provides yellow needles, 0.266g
1
(75%). Mp 169ꢀC; H NMR (200MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ ¼ 2.01–
2.12 (m, 2-CH2), 2.18 (s, 8-CH3), 2.21 (s, 7-CH3), 2.43 (m,
3-CHa), 2.80 (m, 3-CHb), 3.48–3.69 (m, 1-CH2), 6.36–7.66
(m, 12H, aromatic) ppm; IR (KBr): ꢁꢀ¼ 3120, 2980, 2850,
2815, 1600, 1497, 1370, 1290 cmꢁ1; UV (chloroform):
lmax ¼ 257, 326 nm; MS (70 eV): m=z (%) ¼ 353 (Mþ 1,
35), 352 (Mþ, 81), 337 (22), 323 (26), 276 (100), 275 (64),
249 (38), 248 (96), 176 (38), 103 (35), 77 (41).
6,7-Dimethyl-2,3-diphenylquinoxaline (1) was prepared
from 4,5-dimethyl-1,2-phenylenediamine and 1,2-diphenyl-
ethanedione. Physical properties of 1 are comparable with
the data given in literature, e.g., mp 177ꢀC (Ref. [7] 173–
175ꢀC and [8] 172ꢀC); IR and NMR spectra were also found
to be similar to those of published in Refs. [7, 8].
rac-8,9-Dimethyl-4a,5-diphenylpiperidino[1,2-a]quinoxaline
(6, C26H26N2)
General procedure
The same reaction with compound 3 was performed with 1,4-
dichlorobutane (0.254 g, 2.0 mmol). Stirring was continued for
5 h. The crude product was chromatographed (silica=toluene)
rac-1,2-Dihydro-1,2,6,7-tetramethyl-2,3-diphenylquinoxaline
(3, C24H24N2)
1
Compound 1 (0.310g, 1.0 mmol) was placed in a specially
designed flask [6] equipped with a stirring bar and a septum,
the flask was evacuated and filled Ar. Then 100 cm3 of THF
was destilled and freshly cut sodium (ca. 1 g) was added.
Under an Ar atmosphere, the mixture was stirred about 18h
and the excess sodium was removed from the solution of 2.
Methyl iodide (0.284g, 2.0mmol) was injected through the
septum. This mixture was stirred for 5 h. The color of reac-
tion mixture changed from deep purple to deep brown. After
and yellow fluorescent oil (0.280g, 76%) was obtained. H
NMR (200MHz, CDCl3): ꢀ ¼ 1.53–1.78 (m, 3-CH2), 2.17 (s,
9-CH3), 2.25 (s, 8-CH3), 2.35 (t, 4-CH2), 2.83–2.95 (m, 2-
CH2), 3.58 (m, 1-CH2), 6.55–7.46 (m, 12H, aromatic) ppm;
IR (KBr): ꢁꢀ¼ 3120, 2980, 2850, 2780, 1625, 1497, 1446,
1344cmꢁ1; UV (chloroform): lmax ¼ 254 nm; MS (70 eV):
m=z (%) ¼ 367 (Mþ 1, 51), 366 (Mþ, 100), 365 (Mꢁ 1,
26), 310 (31), 309 (34), 290 (98), 289 (57), 263 (38), 262
(94), 247 (31), 234 (37), 207 (34), 183 (43), 103 (34), 77 (26).