Communications
Investigations of the mechanism of the Scholl reaction of
diaryl benzenes by King and co-workers implicated a proto-
nated arenium cation as a key intermediate.[12] To investigate
whether a similar mechanism might be operative here, we
calculated the proton affinity of diphenyl thiophene 2a at
various positions. DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-311+ +G**) indicate
that the carbon next to sulfur has the largest proton affinity
(Figure 2). According to these calculations, the proton affinity of
phenanthro[9,10-c]thiophene is 14 kcal/mol greater than that of
o-terphenyl.
CDCl3 leads to the appearance of a new peak at 5.66 ppm,
consistent with a protonated thiophene. In addition, there is an
evident loss of symmetry in the molecule, with the peaks
corresponding to the protons on the benzene rings splitting
into separate signals. These peaks also move to higher
frequency (7.5–7.7 ppm vs 7.1–7.3 ppm), consistent with being
adjacent to a protonated thiophene. In contrast, addition of the
much weaker acid methanesulfonic acid[13] to compound 2b in
chloroform leads to no change in the proton NMR peaks,
consistent with the poor catalyzing power of MsOH.
The calculations and NMR data are consistent with a ring-
closing mechanism that starts with protonation of the
thiophene ring at the 2-position to form arenium cation i
(Scheme 4). Protonation increases the electrophilicity of the
benzene ring ortho to the protonated site, leading to
nucleophilic attack by the other benzene ring to form
intermediate ii. Oxidation by DDQ and deprotonation give the
final phenanthro[9,10-c]thiophene.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
NMR experiments support the presence of a protonated
arenium intermediate in the triflic acid-catalyzed reaction (Fig-
ure 3). Adding 10% triflic acid to a solution of compound 2b in
In summary, 3,4-diaryl thiophenes can be converted directly
into phenanthro[9,10-c]thiophenes when subjected to DDQ
oxidation in the presence of triflic acid. This route allows access
to
a variety of substituted phenanthro[9,10-c]thiophenes.
Figure 2. Relative proton affinity (kcal/mol) at each unique position in
diphenyl thiophene (2a). Based on DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-311+ +G**).
Computational and NMR studies suggest that protonation of
the thiophene ring is a key step in the reaction. Further
exploration of the reaction scope and mechanism is ongoing.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Stony Brook Foundation for funding of this
research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: arenes · cyclization · heterocycles · oxidation ·
polycycles
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra (11.0–5.0 ppm) of compound 2b (a) in CDCl3; (b) in
10% methanesulfonic acid in CDCl3; and (c) in 10% trilflic acid in CDCl3.[14]
[1] a) Y. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Zhan, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2011, 212, 428–443;
b) B. S. Ong, Y. Wu, Y. Li, P. Liu, H. Pan, Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4766–
4778; c) H. Yao, L. Ye, H. Zhang, S. Li, S. Zhang, J. Hou, Chem. Rev. 2016,
116, 7397–7457; d) U. Mehmood, A. Al-Ahmed, I. A. Hussein, Renewable
Sustainable Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 550–561.
[2] M. Kobayashi, N. Colaneri, M. Boysel, F. Wudl, A. J. Heeger, J. Chem. Phys.
1985, 82, 5717–5723.
[3] DFT calculations (B3LYP/6-311+ +G**) indicate the aromatic stabilization
energy for phenanthro[9,10-c]thiophene is 2.6 kcal/mol greater than
that of thiophene.
[4] P. Kathirgamanathan, M. K. Shepherd, J. Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 354,
305–309.
[5] a) A. Henckens, K. Colladet, S. Fourier, T. J. Cleij, L. Lutsen, J. Gelan, D.
Vanderzande, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 19–26; b) Kevin D. Lewis, David
L. Wenzler, A. J. Matzger, Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2195–2197; c) N. Agarwal,
S. P. Mishra, A. Kumar, M. Ravikanth, Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 744–745; d) I.
Schnapperelle, T. Bach, ChemCatChem. 2013, 5, 3232–3236; e) Y. Dang,
Y. Chen, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2007, 5661–5664.
Scheme 4. Proposed mechanism for the formation of phenanthro[9,10-c]
thiophene.
[6] I. Schnapperelle, T. Bach, Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9725–9732.
ChemPlusChem 2019, 84, 1–5
3
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
��
These are not the final page numbers!