Mononuclear Ferrocenophane Structural Motifs
ing desulfurization reaction of thioureas have been reported.5
However, no examples dealing with the use of thiourea
derivatives as chemosensor molecules for metal cations have
been reported, to the best of our knowledge.
carried out using the same salt solution but with pure solvent, as
opposed to the solution containing the receptor. UV-vis titrations
were performed as follows: a solution of the receptor in DMSO (c
) 1 × 10-4 M) was prepared, and it was titrated with the
appropriate cation salts at room temperature. The titrations were
monitored using a VARIAN 5000 spectrophotometer. Crystal-
lographic data were measured with a Nonius Kappa CCD, and the
structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXS-97)6 and refined
by full-matrix least-squares methods on F2 (SHELXL-97).7
Computational Details. Calculated geometries were fully
optimized in the gas phase with tight convergence criteria at the
density functional theory (DFT) level with the Gaussian 03
package,8 using initially the B3LYP9 functional. Thereafter, the
resulting geometries were refined with the hybrid meta functional
mPW1B9510 that has been recommended for general purpose
applications and was developed to produce a better performance
where weak interactions are involved,10b such as those between
ligands and heavy metals.11 Comparison of calculated with
experimental (X-ray diffraction crystallography) geometries was
performed by computing the root-mean-square deviation (rmsd)
extended over all heavy (non-H) atoms excluding solvent dimeth-
ylformamide (DMF) molecules. Unless otherwise stated, the
6-311G** basis set was used for all atoms, adding diffuse functions
on donor atoms (F, O, N, and S; denoted as aug6-311G**) as well
as the SDD basis set, with effective core potential, for Hg, Cd, and
Pb. All reported data were obtained from these gas-phase optimized
geometries by means of single-point calculations. Energy values
were computed at the same level, considering solvent DMSO effects
by using the Cossi and Barone’s conductor-like polarizable
continuum model (CPCM) modification12 of the Tomasi’s PCM
formalism13 and correcting the basis set superposition error by
means of the counterpoise approach,14 except for metal complexes
because of convergence problems. All energies are uncorrected for
the zero-point vibrational energy. The reduced basis set 6-311G**
Generally, anion recognition motifs are often structurally
complicated and require an elaborate and sophisticated
synthetic process. Therefore, the development of chemosen-
sors capable of recognizing and sensing anions and cations
at the same time is one of the most challenging fields from
the viewpoint of organic and supramolecular chemistry. From
this perspective, we decided to combine in a highly preor-
ganized system the redox activity of the ferrocene moiety
with the strong hydrogen-bonding ability of the thiourea
groups. Despite its homoditopic nature, the unprecedented
capability for binding anions and metal cations is one
interesting characteristic of these new structural motifs.
Experimental Section
General Methods. All reactions were carried out under N2 and
using solvents which were dried by routine procedures. Column
chromatography was performed with the use of a column of
dimensions 60 × 4.5 cm and of silica gel (60 A C.C. 70-200 µm,
sds) as the stationary phase. NMR spectra were recorded at 200,
300, and 400 MHz. The following abbreviations for stating the
multiplicity of the signals in the NMR spectra were used: s (singlet),
bs (broad singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), bt (broad triplet), st
(pseudotriplet), dt (double triplet), m (multiplet), and q (quaternary
carbon). The electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectra were
recorded on an AGILENT V spectrometer. Elemental analyses were
carried out on a Carlo-Erba EA-1108 analyzer. Cyclic voltammo-
grams (CV) and Osteryoung square wave voltammograms (OSWV)
were performed with a conventional three-electrode configuration
consisting of platinum working and auxiliary electrodes and a
saturated calomel electrode (SCE) reference electrode. The experi-
ments were carried out with a 10-3 M solution of sample in dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) containing 0.1 M (n-C4H9)4NPF6 (TBAHP) as
a supporting electrolyte. All of the potential values reported are
relative to the Fc+/Fc couple at room temperature. Deoxygenation
of the solutions was achieved by bubbling nitrogen for at least 10
min, and the working electrode was cleaned after each run. The
CVs were recorded with a scan rate increasing from 0.05 to 1.00
V s-1, while the OSWVs were recorded at a scan rate of 0.1 V s-1
with a pulse hight of 25 mV and a step time of 50 ms. Typically,
the receptor (1 × 10-3 mol) was dissolved in solvent (5 mL), and
TBAHP (base electrolyte; 0.193 g) was added. The guest under
investigation was then added as a 0.1 M solution in appropriate
solvent using a microsyringe, while the CV properties of the solution
were monitored. Ferrocene was used either as an external or internal
reference both for potential calibration and for reversibility criteria.
Under similar conditions, the ferrocene has E° ) 0.390 V vs SCE,
and the anodic peak-cathodic peak separation is 67 mV. Micro-
calorimetric titrations were carried out using an isothermal titration
calorimeter, and they were performed as follows: a solution of the
receptor in DMSO (c ) 1 × 10-3 M) was prepared, and it was
titrated with the appropriate alkylammonium salt at 25 °C. The
original heat pulses were normalized using reference titrations
(6) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97, program for crystal structure solutions;
University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, 1997.
(7) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97, program for refinement of crystal
structures; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, 1997.
(8) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin,
K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa,
J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene,
M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev,
O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala,
P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas,
O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.;
Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.;
Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.;
Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen,
W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision
B.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
(9) Bartolottiand, L. J.; Fluchick, K. In ReViews in Computational
Chemistry; Lipkowitz, K. B., Boyd, B. D., Eds.; VCH: New York,
1996; Vol. 7, pp 187-216.
(10) (a) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 6908–6918.
(b) Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 5656–5667.
(11) For instance, see Mu˜niz, J.; Sansores, L. E.; Mart´ınez, A.; Salcedo,
R. J. Mol. Struct. 2007, 820, 141–147.
(12) (a) Barone, V.; Cossi, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1995–2001.
(b) Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V. J. Comput. Chem.
2003, 24, 669–681.
(13) (a) Miertus, S.; Scrocco, E.; Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 55, 117–
129. (b) Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000,
104, 5631–5637.
(5) (a) Yang, X.-F.; Li, Y.; Bai, Q. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 584, 95–100.
(b) Lee, M. H.; Cho, B. K.; Yoon, J.; Kim, J. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
4515–4518. (c) Wu, F.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-Q.; Ji, Z.-J. J. Fluoresc. 2007,
17, 460–465. (d) Wu, J.-S.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, K. S.; Kim, J. S. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 907–910.
(14) Boys, S. F.; Bernardi, F. Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553–566.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2009 1567