268 Journal of Natural Products, 2009, Vol. 72, No. 2
Zhang et al.
to afford compound 2 (20 mg). Fraction 9, obtained on elution with
CHCl3-MeOH (9:1), was subjected to Si gel CC using petroleum
ether-acetone (6:4-4:6) and resulted in the collection of 27 subfrac-
tions of 100 mL each. Subfractions 10 and 11, obtained on elution
with petroleum ether-acetone (55:45), were combined and applied to
Sephadex LH-20 CC using MeOH, followed by preparative HPLC using
5% aqueous MeOH to afford 3 (15 mg) (tR ) 19.98 min) and 4 (50
mg) (tR ) 24.13 min). Fraction 10, obtained on elution with
CHCl3-MeOH (9:1), was subjected to Si gel CC using petroleum
ether-acetone (6:4-4:6) and resulted in the collection of 27 subfrac-
tions of 10 mL each. Subfraction 8, obtained on elution with petroleum
ether-acetone (55:45), was purified by preparative HPLC using 5%
aqueous MeOH to afford 6 (9 mg) (tR ) 20.30 min).
The CHCl3-soluble extract (28 g) was subjected to passage over a
Si gel column, eluted with petroleum ether-acetone mixtures in a step
gradient of increasing polarity (95:5 to 50:50) to obtain 10 fractions.
Fractions 4, 7, and 10, obtained by elution with petroleum ether-acetone
(9:1, 6:4, and 5:5, respectively), were applied to further separation.
Fraction 4 was chromatographed on an ODS column using 60% aqueous
MeOH (6:4), followed by purification with Sephadex LH-20 CC using
MeOH to afford 1 (20 mg). Fraction 7 was chromatographed on an
ODS column and eluted with 30% MeOH to obtain 59 subfractions of
10 mL each. Subfractions 22-30 were combined and purified by
Sephadex LH-20 CC using MeOH, followed by preparative TLC
(CHCl3-MeOH, 9:1, Rf ) 0.55), to afford 7 (12 mg). Fraction 10 was
chromatographed on a Si gel column using CHCl3-MeOH mixtures
of increasing polarity (90:10 to 60:40) to obtain 30 subfractions of 35
mL each. Subfraction 4 was purified by Sephadex LH-20 CC using
MeOH, followed by HPLC using 5% MeOH, to afford 5 (20 mg) (tR
)33.25 min).
similar procedure, the (S)-MTPA ester (0.6 mg) was prepared from 1
(3.0 mg) by the use of (S)-MTPA (28.1 mg), EDC-HCl (23.0 mg), and
4-DMAP (14.6 mg).
1
(R)-MTPA Ester of 1 (1a): H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.510
(2H, m, Ar-H), 7.410 (3H, m, Ar-H), 6.770 (1H, dd, J ) 10.2, 2.0
Hz, H-2), 6.066 (1H, dd, J ) 10.2, 2.0 Hz, H-3), 5.891 (1H, ddd, J )
7.6, 5.2, 2.8 Hz, H-4), 3.550 (3H, s, OCH3), 2.480 (1H, m, H-6),
2.440(1H, m, H-5eq), 1.837 (1H, dddd, J ) 12.2, 7.6, 5.2, 2.8 Hz,
H-5ax), 1.151 (3H, d, J ) 6.8 Hz, H3-7).
(S)-MTPA Ester 1 (1b): 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.510 (2H,
m, Ar-H), 7.420 (3H, m, Ar-H), 6.663 (1H, dd, J ) 10.2, 2.0 Hz,
H-2), 6.034 (1H, dd, J ) 10.2, 2.0 Hz, H-3), 5.900 (1H, ddd, J ) 7.6,
5.2, 2.8 Hz, H-4), 3.550 (3H, s, OCH3), 2.501 (2H, m, H-5eq and H-6),
1.925 (1H, dddd, J ) 7.6, 5.2, 2.8 Hz, H-5ax), 1.175 (3H, d, J ) 6.8
Hz, H3-7).
Glycosidase Inhibition Assay. The enzymes of R-glucosidase from
baker’s yeast, ꢀ-glucosidase from almonds, and naringinase from
Penicillium decumbens, as well as the substrates of p-nitrophenyl R-D-
glucopyranoside, p-nitrophenyl ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside, and p-nitrophenyl
R-L-rhamnopyranoside, were purchased from Sigma Chemical Com-
pany. Other chemicals were purchased from native companies. The
glycosidase inhibition assay was performed according to the reported
methods12-14 with slight modification. As for the R-glucosidase
inhibition assay, 50 µL of 0.2 U/mL enzyme in 0.2 M phosphate buffer
(pH 6.8) and 50 µL of compound solution in the same buffer were
incubated in 96-well plates at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, 50 µL of 2.5
mM p-nitrophenyl R-D-glucopyranoside in 0.2 M phosphate buffer was
added, and the plate was incubated at 37 °C for another 5 min. The
reaction was quenched by the addition of 0.1 M Na2CO3 solution (0.1
mL). Acarbose was tested as a positive control. Before and after
reaction, absorbance readings were recorded at 405 nm by microplate
reader (Genios) and compared to a negative control, which had 50 µL
of buffer solution in place of compound solution to calculate percentage
inhibition. This procedure was also used for ꢀ-glucosidase and
R-rhamnosidase inhibition assays. ꢀ-Glucosidase inhibition was evalu-
ated using p-nitrophenyl ꢀ-D-glucopyranoside as a substrate, citrate-
phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) as a reaction buffer, and borate buffer (pH
9.0) as an alkali solution to stop the reaction. R-Rhamnosidase inhibition
was assayed using naringinase as an enzyme, p-nitrophenyl R-L-
rhamnopyranoside as a substrate, citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) as
a reaction buffer, and 0.4 M NaOH as an alkali solution to stop the
reaction. Glycosidase inhibitory activity was expressed as IC50 values.
The IC50 values (IC50 ( SD, mM) against R-glucosidase were
determined as 3.59 ( 0.008 (1), 6.12 ( 0.006 (3), 5.93 ( 0.002 (5),
1.74 ( 0.004 (7), >10 (2, 4, and 6), and 0.03 ( 0.003 (acarbose). The
values of all test compounds against ꢀ-glucosidase and R-rhamnosidase
were more than 10 mM.
Antibacterial Activity. The antibacterial activity against S. aureus,
E. coli, P. Vulgaris, and P. aeruginosa was evaluated by microplate
Alamar Blue assay as described in our previous report.3 Briefly, serial
2-fold dilutions of compounds 1-7 and ceftazidime were made in
DMSO, and the test bacteria at a concentration of 2 × 105 cfu/mL
were prepared in MHB medium supplemented with 8% Alamar Blue.
In a 96-well plate, 78 µL of each test organism and 2 µL each of the
compound dilutions were mixed and incubated at 32 °C until growth
control wells developed the growth (pink color). The fluorescence
intensity was then measured using a plate reader (Synergy HT, Bio-
Tek, Winooski, VT) with excitation at 530 nm and emission at 590
nm. The percentage inhibition of each compound dilution was
calculated. All tests were run in triplicate and averaged. MIC50 and
MIC90 values (Table 3), defined as the concentrations required to reduce
bacterial growth by 50% and 90%, respectively, were obtained by
interpolation of concentration-inhibition curves.
Ampelomin A (1): yellowish oil; [R]2D0 +50.1 (c 1.6, MeOH);
positive ESIMS m/z 253 [2 M + H]+, 165 [M + K]+, 149 [M + Na]+,
127 [M + H]+; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.85 (1H, dt, J ) 10.0,
2.0 Hz, H-2), 5.95 (1H, dd, J ) 10.0, 2.0 Hz, H-3), 4.64 (1H, ddt, J )
10.2, 4.8, 2.0 Hz, H-4), 2.35-2.40 (2H, m, H-5eq and H-6), 1.72 (1H,
tdd, J ) 12.2, 10.2, 2.0 Hz, H-5ax), 1.45 (3H, d, J ) 6.5 Hz, H3-7);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 201.6 (C-1), 128.4 (C-2), 153.5 (C-3),
67.2 (C-4), 41.2 (C-5), 40.1 (C-6), 14.8 (C-7); HRESIMS m/z 127.0758
[M + H]+ (calcd for C7H11O2, 127.0754).
Ampelomin B (2): colorless oil; [R]2D0 +90.6 (c 0.415, MeOH);
positive ESIMS m/z 311 [2 M + Na]+, 183 [M + K]+, 167 [M +
1
Na]+; H NMR (400 MHz) see Table 1; 13C NMR (100 MHz) see
Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 167.0676 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C7H12O3Na,
167.0679).
Ampelomin C (3): white solid; [R]2D0 -15.3 (c 0.74, MeOH); positive
ESIMS m/z 315 [2 M + Na]+, 293 [2 M + H]+, 169 [M + Na]+, 147
1
[M + H]+; H NMR (400 MHz) see Table 1; 13C NMR (100 MHz)
see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 169.0848 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C7H14O3Na,
169.0835).
Ampelomin D (4): white solid; [R]2D0 -5.9 (c 0.22, MeOH); positive
1
ESIMS m/z 315 [2 M + Na]+, 169 [M + Na]+; H NMR (400 MHz)
see Table 1; 13C NMR (100 MHz) see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 169.0841
[M + Na]+ (calcd for C7H14O3Na, 169.0835).
Ampelomin E (5): white solid; [R]2D0 -46.7 (c 0.67, MeOH); positive
1
ESIMS m/z 315 [2 M + Na]+, 169 [M + Na]+; H NMR (400 MHz)
see Table 1; 13C NMR (100 MHz) see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 169.0820
[M + Na]+ (calcd for C7H14O3Na, 169.0835).
Ampelomin F (6): white solid; [R]2D0 +37.6 (c 0.5, MeOH); positive
1
ESIMS m/z 315 [2 M + Na]+, 169 [M + Na]+; H NMR (400 MHz)
see Table 1; 13C NMR (100 MHz) see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 145.0864
[M - H]- (calcd for C7H13O3, 145.0870).
Ampelomin G (7): white solid; [R]2D0 -17.0 (c 0.73, MeOH); positive
1
ESIMS m/z 319 [M + Na]+; H NMR (400 MHz) see Table 1; 13C
NMR (100 MHz) see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 319.1149 [M + Na]+
(calcd for C15H20O6Na, 319.1152).
Preparation of the (R)-MTPA and (S)-MPTA Esters of 1. A
solution of 1 (3.0 mg, 0.024 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL) was treated
with (R)-MTPA (28.1 mg, 0.12 mmol) in the presence of EDC-HCl
(23.0 mg, 0.12 mmol) and 4-DMAP (14.6 mg, 0.12 mmol), and the
mixture was stirred at room temperature (25 °C) for 7 days. The reaction
mixture was poured into ice-water, and the mixture was extracted with
CHCl3. The CHCl3 extract was successively washed with 5% HCl,
saturated NaHCO3, and brine, dried over MgSO4, and filtered. Evapora-
tion of the solvent furnished a residue, which was purified by Si gel
CC (1 g, CHCl3) to give the (R)-MTPA ester (0.6 mg). Through a
Acknowledgment. We thank Prof. R. Chen, Guangzhou Institute
of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for 1D and 2D NMR
spectroscopic measurements, Dr. D. Fang, Chengdu Institute of Biology,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, for HRESIMS data, and Prof. T. Li,
Guangdong Institute of Microbiology for microbiological authentication.
This work was supported by an NSFC grant (No. 20672114) and the
Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS, Grant No. KSCX2-YW-N-
036.