10.1002/adsc.201700722
Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis
COMMUNICATION
was evaporated under reduced pressure. Under argon
atmosphere, 2-bromo substituted primary alcohol (0.5 mmol),
secondary alcohol (0.5 mmol) and NaOH (10 mg, 0.25 mmol)
and 1.5 mL toluene were added in the tube. The reaction
calculated activation energy barrier for the C=C bond
hydrogenation was much lower (2.38 kcal/mol; TS2) than the
C=O bond (20.43 kcal/mol, TS2ʹ). Based on these data, we
could conclude that the alkene insertion into the Ru-H (I3) was
more favored. Lower barrier for the C=O bond hydrogenation
(4.70 kcal/mol, TS3) improvised the greater selectivity for the
alcohol product which was consistent with the experimental
results. Briefly, the lower activation energy barriers for the
dehydrogenation of alcohols as well as hydrogenation of the α,β-
unsaturated ketones signified the higher efficiency and
selectivity of this catalytic system.
In summary, we demonstrated a highly active Ru(II)-NHC
catalyzed β-alkylation of secondary alcohols and double
alkylation of cyclopentanol with different primary alcohols
following the hydrogen borrowing methodology. A large variety
of aromatic, aliphatic and heterocyclic alcohols were cross
coupled efficiently using significantly lower catalyst loading
(down to 0.001 mol%). This efficient, atom economical and
greener strategy enables straightforward access to a variety of
β-alkylated secondary alcohols with high selectivity using solvent
as well as under neat conditions. Importantly, this catalytic
system revealed exceptionally high TON of 288000 which is the
highest among all the reported transition metal complexes in
cross coupling of alcohols. Notably, utilizing this sustainable
protocol biologically active flavan derivatives were synthesized
in one-pot manner in good to excellent yields. Furthermore the
proposed mechanism was supported by detailed DFT
calculations and kinetic experiments.
°
mixture was heated at 125 C for 6 h. Then the reaction mixture
was cooled under argon atmosphere. After that, CuI (20 mol%),
2,2ʹ-bipyridine (20 mol%), NaOH (60 mg, 1.5 mmol) and another
1 mL toluene were added to the same tube and heated further
°
for 24 h (oil bath temperature: 125 C). Then tube was cooled
and reaction mixture was quenched with aqueous NH4Cl
solution. Next, dichloromethane was added to the reaction
mixture and the organic layer was separated. This process was
repeated three times (3×12 mL) and the combined organic
phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. Then the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure. The corresponding flavan
derivatives were isolated through silica gel column
chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate as eluent. The final
products were authenticated by NMR, GC-MS and ESI-MS
analysis.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Science and Engineering Research Board
(SERB), India and Council of Scientific & Industrial Research
(CSIR) and DST-INSPIRE for financial support. S.S., B.C.R.
thank CSIR India, B.P., K.C. thank UGC India, D.P., K.G. thank
IITK for fellowship.
Keywords: alkylation • ruthenium • sustainable synthesis •
tandem process
Experimental Section
[1]
[2]
a) C. Gunanathan, D. Milstein, Science 2013, 341; b) Q. Yang, Q.
Wang, Z. Yu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2305-2329; c) A.
Nandakumar, S. P. Midya, V. G. Landge, E. Balaraman, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 11022-11034; d) J. M. Ketcham, I. Shin,
T. P. Montgomery, M. J. Krische, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53,
9142-9150; e) S. Bähn, S. Imm, L. Neubert, M. Zhang, H.
Neumann, M. Beller, ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1853-1864.
a) W. M. Akhtar, C. B. Cheong, J. R. Frost, K. E. Christensen, N. G.
Stevenson, T. J. Donohoe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2577-
2580; b) Y. Xie, Y. Ben-David, L. J. W. Shimon, D. Milstein, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9077-9080; c) G. Zhang, J. Wu, H. Zeng, S.
Zhang, Z. Yin, S. Zheng, Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 1080-1083; d) M.
Peña-López, P. Piehl, S. Elangovan, H. Neumann, M. Beller,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14967-14971.
General Procedure for β-Alkylation of Secondary
Alcohols with Primary Alcohols
A catalytic stock solution was prepared by dissolving complex A
(6 mg, 8.24×10-3 mmol) in 4 mL acetonitrile. Then required
amount of the stock solution (0.01 mol%) was taken in a Schlenk
tube, equipped with a magnetic stir bar and acetonitrile was
evaporated under reduced pressure. Next, secondary alcohol
(0.5 mmol), primary alcohol (0.5 mmol; for double alkylation of
cyclopentanol, 1.05 mmol), NaOiPr (0.20 mmol and 0.5 mmol for
cyclopentanol) and 1.5 mL toluene were taken in the tube under
[3]
[4]
[5]
a) M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1982, 21, 96-108; b) J.
Otera, Modern Carbonyl Chemistry, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
C. S. Cho, B. T. Kim, H.-S. Kim, T.-J. Kim, S. C. Shim,
Organometallics 2003, 22, 3608-3610.
°
argon atmosphere. After that, the tube was heated at 125 C (oil
bath temperature) for 3 h (12 h for double alkylation of
cyclopentanol). After immediate cooling, 10 µL solution was
syringed out for GC analysis (mesitylene was used as internal
standard). 0.25 mL reaction mixture was concentrated under
reduced pressure and the crude residue was subjected for 1H
NMR. The conversion and product selectivity were calculated
through 1H NMR analysis (with respect to 1,3,5-
trimethoxybenzene). After that, the NMR solution and rest
portion of the reaction mixture was concentrated for isolation of
the desired alcohol through column chromatography using
hexane/ethyl acetate as eluent.
a) A. Prades, M. Viciano, M. Sanaú, E. Peris, Organometallics
2008, 27, 4254-4259; b) X. Chang, L. W. Chuan, L. Yongxin, S. A.
Pullarkat, Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1450-1455; c) H. W. Cheung,
T. Y. Lee, H. Y. Lui, C. H. Yeung, C. P. Lau, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 2975-2983; d) G. R. A. Adair, J. M. J. Williams,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8233-8235; e) O. Kose, S. Saito, Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 896-900; f) C. Xu, L. Y. Goh, S. A.
Pullarkat, Organometallics 2011, 30, 6499-6502; g) C. Segarra, E.
Mas-Marzá, J. A. Mata, E. Peris, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353,
2078-2084; h) A. Pontes da Costa, M. Viciano, M. Sanaú, S.
Merino, J. Tejeda, E. Peris, B. Royo, Organometallics 2008, 27,
1305-1309; i) S. Musa, L. Ackermann, D. Gelman, Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2013, 355, 3077-3080; j) K.-i. Fujita, C. Asai, T. Yamaguchi,
F. Hanasaka, R. Yamaguchi, Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4017-4019; k) P.
Satyanarayana, G. M. Reddy, H. Maheswaran, M. L. Kantam, Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1859-1867.
General Procedure for One-pot Synthesis of Flavan
Derivatives
[6]
[7]
D. Gnanamgari, C. H. Leung, N. D. Schley, S. T. Hilton, R. H.
Crabtree, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 4442-4445.
Q. Wang, K. Wu, Z. Yu, Organometallics 2016, 35, 1251-1256.
0.1 mol% catalytic stock solution was charged in a Schlenk tube
which was equipped with a magnetic stir bar and acetonitrile
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.