89% ee,9a enantioselectivity decreases to 79% ee with
4-methoxycinnamaldehyde,2e and there is no example
for other substituents on the aromatic ring.11 This type
of reaction was also extended to N-heterocyclic carbene-
catalyzed oxidative cyclopropanation of R,β-unsaturated
aldehydes12 and the use of β,γ-unsaturated R-ketoesters13
or R,β-unsaturated ketones14 as substrates. However, the
reactions with substituted aromatic groups have the draw-
back that either the yield or stereoselectivity is only low to
moderate. In this context, we set out to develop a catalyst
for asymmetric cyclopropanation with aromatic R,β-
unsaturated aldehydes to afford products 1 with high yield
and stereoselectivity.
Scheme 1. Organo-catalyzed Cyclopropanation of
R,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes
(5) For selected examples, see: (a) Vignola, N.; List, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 450–451. (b) Deng, X.-M.; Cai, P.; Ye, S.; Sun, X.-L.;
Liao, W.-W.; Li, K.; Tang, Y.; Wu, Y.-D.; Dai, L.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 9730–9740. (c) McCooey, S. H.; McCabe, T.; Connon, S. J. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7494–7497. (d) Kojima, S.; Suzuki, M.; Watanabe,
A.; Ohkata, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 9061–9065. (e) Xie, H.; Zu,
L.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10886–
10984. (f) Fan, R.; Ye, Y.; Li, W.; Wang, L. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350,
Figure 1. Resin-supported peptide catalyst.
In recent years, we have focused on resin-supported
peptide catalysts as secondary amine organocatalysts
(Figure 1).15,16 The peptide consisting of a β-turn motif,
D-Pro-Aib (Aib = 2-aminoisobutyric acid),17 and a helical
part is a versatile catalyst promoting various asymmetric
organocatalytic reactions especially in aqueous media. The
turn structure formed by the terminal five residues is
essential for controlling enantioselectivity, and the hydro-
phobic helical part enhances reactions and stabilizes the
whole peptide structure under aqueous conditions.15a We
envisioned that this type of catalyst might be also effective
for regulating the diastereoselectivity of the reaction be-
cause of the highly customizable property of peptides by
modifying sequences with various kinds of amino acids.
Herein, we report the diastereo- and enantioselective cy-
clopropanation of aromatic R,β-unsaturated aldehydes
with a resin-supported peptide catalyst.
ꢀ
2488–2492. (g) Ibrahem, I.; Zhao, G.-L.; Rios, R.; Vesely, J.; Sunden,
ꢀ
H.; Dziedzic, P.; Cordova, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 7867–7879. (h)
Wascholowski, V.; Hansen, H. M.; Longbottom, D. A.; Ley, S. V.
Synthesis 2008, 1269–1275. (i) Vesely, J.; Zhao, G.-L.; Bartoszewicz, A.;
ꢀ
Cordova, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4209–4212. (j) Marini, F.;
Sternativo, S.; Del Verme, F.; Testaferri, L.; Tiecco, M. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2009, 351, 1801–1806. (k) Lv, J.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Z.; Wang, Y.
ꢀ
Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 972–979. (l) Companyo, X.; Alba, A.-N.;
ꢀ
Cardenas, F.; Moyano, A.; Rios, R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 3075–3080.
(m) Zhang, J.-M.; Hu, Z.-P.; Dong, L.-T.; Xuan, Y.-N.; Lou, C.-L.;
Yan, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20, 355–361. (n) Terrasson, V.;
van der Lee, A.; de Figueiredo, R. M.; Campagne, J. M. Chem.;Eur. J.
2010, 16, 7875–7880. (o) Pesciaioli, F.; Righi, P.; Mazzanti, A.; Bartoli,
G.; Bencivenni, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2842–2845. (p) Russo, A.;
Meninno, S.; Tedesco, C.; Lattanzi, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 5096–
ꢀ
5103. (q) Rueping, M.; Sunden, H.; Hubener, L.; Sugiono, E. Chem.
Commun. 2012, 48, 2201–2203. (r) Del Fiandra, C.; Piras, L.; Fini, F.;
Disetti, P.; Moccia, M.; Adamo, M. F. A. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
3863–3865. (s) Dou, X.; Lu, Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2012, 18, 8315–8319. (u)
Das, U.; Tsai, Y.-L.; Lin, W. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 44–47. (v)
Raveendran, A. E.; Paul, R. R.; Suresh, E.; Nair, V. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2010, 8, 901–905.
€
(6) For reviews of organocatalysis, see: (a) Erkkila, A.; Majander, I.;
Cyclopropanation of 4-nitrocinnamaldehyde with a sul-
fur ylide waschosenasa modelreaction (Table 1). Initially,
we checked the general tendency of this reaction with some
typical amine catalysts in chloroform for 24 h. When the
reaction was performed with indoline-2-carboxylic acid 4
which was employed in MacMillan’s report,9 three diaster-
eomers were generated with low reaction efficiency (Table 1,
entry 1). Although diastereomer 1 was produced selectively
to some extent, the enantioselectivity was quite low. With
L-proline as a catalyst, enhancement of the reaction rate
and enantioselectivity was observed with lowered diastereo-
selectivity (Table 1, entry 2). A versatile secondary amine
catalyst, diphenylprolinol silyl ether 6,18 promoted the
Pihko, P. M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5416–5470. (b) Mukherjee, S.; Yang,
J. W.; Hoffman, S.; List, B. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5471–5569. (c)
Dondoni, A.; Massi, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4638–4660.
(d) Melchiorre, P.; Marigo, M.; Carlone, A.; Bartoli, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6138–6171. (e) Bertelsen, S.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2178–2189.
(7) (a) Aggarwal, V. K.; Smith, H. W.; Jones, R. V. H.; Fieldhouse, R.
Chem. Commun. 1997, 1785–1786. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Alonso, E.;
Fang, G.; Ferrara, M.; Hynd, G.; Porcelloni, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 1433–1436.
(8) (a) Papageorgiou, C. D.; de Dios, M. A. C.; Ley, S. V.; Gaunt,
M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4641–4644. (b) Johansson,
C. C. C.; Bremeyer, N.; Ley, S. V.; Owen, D. R.; Smith, S. C.; Gaunt,
M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6024–6028.
(9) (a) Kunz, R. K.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 3240–3241. (b) Lakhdar, S.; Appel, R.; Mayr, H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 5034–5037.
(10) Li, W.; Li, X.; Ye, T.; Wu, W.; Liang, X.; Ye, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2011, 52, 2715–2718.
(11) (a) Hartikka, A.; Arvidsson, P. I. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5874–
(15) (a) Akagawa, K.; Suzuki, R.; Kudo, K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012,
354, 1280–1286. (b) Akagawa, K.; Umezawa, R.; Kudo, K. Beilstein J.
Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 1333–1337. (c) Akagawa, K.; Kudo, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 12786–12789.
(16) For reviews of peptide catalysts, see: (a) Miller, S. J. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2004, 37, 601–610. (b) Davie, E. A. C.; Mennen, S. M.; Xu, Y.;
Miller, S. J. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5759–5812. (c) Wennemers, H. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 12036–12041.
ꢀ
ꢀ
5877. (b) Hartikka, A.; Slosarczyk, A. T.; Arvidsson, P. I. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2007, 18, 1403–1409. (c) Zhao, Y.-H.; Zhao, G.; Cao, W.-G.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 2462–2467. (d) Zhao, Y.-H.; Zheng,
C.-W.; Zhao, G.; Cao, W.-G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 701–
708.
(12) Biswas, A.; De Sarkar, S.; Tebben, L.; Studer, A. Chem. Commun.
2012, 48, 5190–5192.
(13) Cheng, Y.; An, J.; Lu, L.-Q.; Luo, L.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Chen, J.-R.;
(17) (a) Haque, T. S.; Little, J. C.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1996, 118, 6975–6985. (b) Blank, J. T.; Miller, S. J. Biopolymers 2006, 84,
38–47.
Xiao, W.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 281–284.
(14) Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Dong, S.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. J. Org. Chem. 2013,
78, 6322–6327.
(18) Mielgo, A.; Palomo, C. Chem.;Asian J. 2008, 3, 922–948.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX