1884
Y. Zhang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1882–1885
are derived from Cope rearrangement of 1 followed by isomeriza-
-ln(ee%)
1
tion. Stereoselective hydride reduction of 1 gave the corresponding
alcohol 2213 as a crystalline solid with no deterioration in enantio-
meric purity, according to Mosher ester analysis (23).20 Allylation
produced 24 (75%). Compound 24 failed to undergo anion-acceler-
ated oxy-Cope rearrangement at low temperature, and at higher
temperature, only the transannular Cope product, trisubstituted
cyclopentene 26, was obtained. To further demonstrate the versa-
tility of 1, and to evaluate a potential alternative oxy-Cope se-
quence, 1 was epoxidized and then allylated to give 27. Upon
subjection to anion-accelerated oxy-Cope conditions, the transan-
nular epoxide-opened product 28 was cleanly obtained (90%).
Transannular cyclization of 19 to 28 occurs slowly at low temper-
ature. Indeed, when the allylation of 1 was run at 0 °C, 28 was ob-
tained in good yield (76%)21 (see Scheme 4).
These studies elaborate earlier findings on cyclononadienone 1,
including several stereoselective transformations and insight into
the structure of this interesting class of synthetically useful inter-
mediates. Importantly, 19–29 are derived from 1, and are obtained
in enantioenriched form. Many dissymmetric compounds related
to 1 should be readily accessible.
•
y=(0.0217)t+0.1767
0.8
0.6
0.4
R
2 =0.9996
•
•
•
0.2
•
0
0
10
20
time (h)
30
40
Figure 1. Plot of Àln(ee%) versus time.17
and AlCl3 also failed to promote this reaction.18 No cyclopentadi-
ene cycloaddition product was observed at elevated temperatures.
Acknowledgment
Instead, 20 and 21 were obtained.19 These
a,b-unsaturated ketones
Generous financial support from Merck & Co. is gratefully
acknowledged.
Me
O
O
a
References and notes
1. Prelog, V.; Schenker, K. Helv. Chim. Acta 1952, 35, 2044–2053; Still, W. C.;
Galynker, I. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3981–3996.
19
2. (a) Tatsuta, K.; Hosokawa, S. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4707–4729; (b) Ohtsuka, Y.;
Niitsuma, S.; Tadokoro, H.; Hayashi, T.; Oishi, T. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2326–
2332.
3. (a) Corey, E. J.; Mitra, R. B.; Uda, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 362–363; (b)
Corey, E. J.; Mitra, R. B.; Uda, H. J. Org. Chem. 1964, 86, 485–492; (c) Larionov, O.
V.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2954–2955.
4. Andrianasolo, E. H.; Haramaty, L.; Degenhardt, K.; Mathew, R.; White, E.; Lutz,
R.; Falkowski, P. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 1551–1557.
5. El-Gramal, A. A. H.; Wang, S.-K.; Duh, C.-Y. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 338–341.
6. Cope, A. C.; Banholzer, K.; Keller, H.; Pawson, B. A.; Whang, J. J.; Winkler, H. J. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3644–3649.
7. It has long been recognized that conformers will be chiral in the absence of free
rotation. van’t Hoff, J. H. The Arrangement of Atoms in Space; Longmans, Green,
and CO: 39 Paternoster Row, London, New York and Bombay, 1898. p 54.
8. Lipshutz, B. H.; Ellsworth, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7440–7441.
9. Hajos, Z. G.; Parish, D. R. Org. Synth. Col. 1990, 7, 363–368.
10. The route to 1 was not optimized in light of Ref. 3c.
11. Grob fragmentation conditions, see also Ref. 3a (a) Paquette, L. A.; Yang, Jiong.;
Long, Y. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6542–6543; (b) Winkler, J. D.; Quinn, K.
J.; MacKinnon, C. H.; Hiscock, S. D.; McLaughlin, E. C. Org Lett. 2003, 5, 1805–
1808; (c) Molander, G. A.; Huérou, Y. L.; Brown, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
4511–4516.
Xb
no Diels-Alder product observed
Me
Me
Me
Me
O
c
+
Me
O
O
1
20
21
O
22, R = H
23, R =
d
e
F3C
MeO
RO
Me
H
Ph
Me
HO
Me
X g
f
O
12. Molecular modeling suggests that 15 is highly constrained and that the
(HO)CCCO(Ts) torsion angle is 139° (see Ref. 16).
H
24
25
13. This compound was characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction.
Crystallographic data for compound 17, 19, and 22 have been deposited with
the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, Nos. CCDC 712607 (17), CCDC
712606 (19), and CCDC 712605 (22). Copies of the data can be obtained, free of
charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK, (fax:
+44-(0)1223-336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.Uk).
Me
h
24
19
OH
26
Me
14. Molecular modeling suggests that 18 is more highly constrained than 15, and
the (HO)CCCO(Ts) torsion angle for 18 is better suited for fragmentation (165°)
(see Ref. 16).
O
Me
OH
15. NOSY analysis shows the olefin protons as proximal, cf. 3c.
16. Calculations used (DFT-B3LYP 6-31G(d, p)). (a) All structures were fully
optimized by analytical gradient methods using the GAUSSIAN 03 suites, (a)
Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlege, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.;
Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.,
et al GAUSSIAN 03, Revision E.01; Gaussian: Wallingford, CT, 2004; Density
functional (DFT) calculations used the exchange potentials of: (b) Becke, A. D. J.
Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648; the correlation functional of: (c) Lee, C.; Yang, W.;
Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
17. Bada, J. L.; Protsch, R. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1973, 70, 1331–1334. We define half-
life as ee = 50%.
18. (a) Murray, L. M.; O’Brien, P.; Taylor, R. J. K. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1943–1946;
(b) Jeroncic, L. O.; Cabal, M-P.; Danishefsky, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
O
HO
i
j
27
28
Scheme 4. Reactions and conditions: (a) DMDO, CHCl3, 0 °C, 96%; (b) cyclopenta-
diene, rt/Lewis acid (see text), toluene, À78 °C to rt; (c) cyclopentadiene, toluene,
130 °C, 60%, 2:1;3 (d) NaBH4, methanol, 0 °C, 93%; (e) (R)-Mosher’s acid, DCU, DMAP,
CH2Cl2, rt, 80%; (f) allylmagnesium chloride, THF, 0 °C to rt, 75%; (g) KH, 18-crown-
6, THF, reflux; (h) toluene, 130 °C; (i) allylmagnesium chloride, THF, À78 °C, 75%; (j)
KH, 18-crown-6, THF, À78 °C to rt, 90%.