M. G. Ali Badry et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1385–1388
1387
I
around 166–167 ppm, these latter products 13e–g showed ranges
R
δ+
I
of ꢀ41 and 168 ppm for the corresponding resonances. Hence, it
was concluded that these were the benzo[d]oxepinones 13e–g,
arising by a 7-endo-dig pathway. These conclusions were also con-
sistent with some appropriate data shown by similar compounds
obtained by Marchal et al. during their work on the related gold-
catalysed cyclisations.11 These data were also consistent with the
probable formation of small amounts of the alternative ring sizes
in each example. Thus, although partly obscured in the initial
iodinated product 12a, the 1H NMR spectrum of the hydrogenolysis
product 14a displayed a distinct olefinic singlet centred on dH 6.21,
which was assigned to the seven-membered ring product [15;
R = C3H7].11 The phenyl case 10c appears to be an exception. Some
further evidence was obtained by hydrogenolysis of the 4-methoxy
derivative 12e, which delivered a product 15 [R = 4-MeOC6H4] dis-
playing an olefinic proton at dH 6.86, a position very similar to that
quoted by Marchal et al.11 for the same compound. By contrast, the
isomeric isochromanone is reported to show an olefinic resonance
at dH 6.28, a clear difference. Unfortunately, other data (remaining
1H and 13C NMR data, m.p.s, ir) were closely similar and could not
realistically be used for definitive assignments.
R
δ+
O
O
>
O
H
O
H
16
17
Figure 2.
OMe
OMe
I
I
I
C
O
O
O
O
H
O
H
O
H
18
19
20
Figure 3.
derivative 10d, while reacting rapidly with iodine, failed to give
meaningful products, a pity, as the product(s) arising could have
contributed significantly to these ideas.
In any event, these examples indicate that this chemistry can be
used to prepare the structural types 12 or 13 with often high reg-
ioselectivities, but only when the correct substituent is present on
the alkyne terminus.
H
R
O
O
15
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to the Egyptian Government for the award of a
Scholarship (to M.G.A.B.).
Final proof of the seven-membered ring structures 13 was obtained
by X-ray crystallographic analysis of the 2,3,4,-trimethoxyphenyl
product 13g, the ORTEP diagram of which is shown in Figure 1.17
Hence, our conclusion is that iodolactonizations of 2-(alky-
nyl)phenylacetic acids 10 favour the 6-exo pathway to give iso-
chromanones 12 when the alkyne substituent is alkyl, but the
alternative 7-endo route leading to benzo[d]oxepinones 13 when
the same substituent is aryl. This may possibly be explained by
considering the process to involve a relatively late transition state.
In the case of an alkyl-substituted intermediate, perhaps the mes-
omeric effect of the aryl ring (16) outweighs the inductive effect of
the alkyl group (17) in stabilizing the developing electron-deficient
carbon centre (Fig. 2).
The relatively poor level of stereoselection shown by the phe-
nyl-substituted example 10c may simply be due to the rather sym-
metrical nature of the intermediate 18, together with the usual
preference for an exo cyclisation mode over a competing endo path-
way (Fig. 3). Participation by a para-methoxy group 19, repre-
sented in extreme form by structure 20, could override all other
factors and explain the very high preference for formation of the
7-endo-dig products 13e–g. Unfortunately, the related 4-nitro
References and notes
1. Baldwin, J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734. and 738; Johnson, C. D.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 476.
2. (a) Biagetti, M.; Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.; Stabile, P.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2002, 43,
5023; (b) Rossi, R.; Carpita, A.; Bellina, F.; Stabile, P.; Mannina, L. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 2067; For earlier work on bromolactonizations, see: Kraft, G. A.;
Katzenellenbogen, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5459.
3. Yao, T.; Larock, R. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5936.
4. Rossi, R.; Bellina, F.; Biagetti, M.; Catanese, A.; Mannina, L. Tetrahedron Lett.
2000, 41, 5281; See also: Sashida, H.; Kawamukai, A. Synthesis 1999, 1145;
Bouyssi, D.; Balme, G. Synlett 2001, 1191.
5. Duchene, A.; Thibonnet, J.; Parrain, J.-L.; Anselmi, E.; Abarbri, M. Synthesis 2007,
597.
6. Bellina, F.; Ciucci, D.; Vergamini, P.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2533.
7. Hellal, M.; Bourguignon, J.-J.; Bihel, F. J.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 62; See
also: Ogawa, Y.; Maruno, M.; Wakamatsu, T. Heterocycles 1995, 41, 2587.
8. Letsinger, R. L.; Oftedahl, E. N.; Nazy, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 742, and
references therein.
9. Uchiyama, M.; Ozawa, H.; Takuma, K.; Matsumoto, Y.; Yonehara, M.; Hiroya, K.;
Sakamoto, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5517; Kanazawa, C.; Terada, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 933; For theoretical calculations of the basis of the 5-exo selectivity
under basic conditions, see: Terada, M.; Kanazawa, C.; Yamanaka, M.
Heterocycles 2007, 74, 819.
10. Yu, Y.; Stephenson, A.; Mitchell, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3811.
11. Marchal, E.; Uriac, P.; Legouin, B.; Toupet, L.; van de Weghe, P. Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 9979.
12. Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 4467;
Sonogashira, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653, 46.
13. Batchu, V. R.; Subramanian, V.; Parasuraman, K.; Swamy, N. K.; Kumar, S.; Pal,
M. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 9869.
14. Sahu, B.; Muruganantham, R.; Namboothiri, I. N. N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
2477. and references therein.
15. Knight, D. W. Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002, 14, 19.
16. For an alternative method for carrying out this selective deiodination, see Ref.
2a.
OMe
I
OMe
OMe
O
O
13g
17. Compound 13g crystallized from ethyl acetate/petrol, mp 157–159 °C.
C19H17IO5, Mr = 452.23, monoclinic, P21/c, a = 16.4140(6) Å, b = 11.5730(4) Å,
c = 9.5930(3) Å, b = 98.675(2)°, V = 1801.43(11) Å3, Z = 4, DX = 1.667 Mg mÀ3
,
k(Mo
Ka) = 0.71073 Å, l , F(000) = 896, T = 296(2) K, crystal
= 1.803 cmÀ1
size = 0.40 Â 0.35 Â 0.20 mm3, Reflections collected = 10,605, Independent
reflections = 4009, 2676 with Fo > 4(Fo), Rint = 0.0395, Final R1 = 0.0402,
wR2 = 0.0836 for I > 2r(I), and R1 = 0.0710, wR2 = 0.0946 for all data.Data
Figure 1. ORTEP diagram of the 2,3,4-trimethoxybenzo[d]oxepinone 13g.