E. Korchagina et al. / Carbohydrate Research 356 (2012) 238–246
245
Table 4
Serologic reactions of blood group A kodecytes created with different FSL spacers
a
FSL-Atri
Spacersc
Ad
FSL-A kodecyte serologic reactionsb against dilutions of monoclonal anti-A
l
M
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
++
256
512
1024
50
10
5
++++
+++
++
++++
+++
++
++++
+++
+
++++
++
++++
++
—
++++
++
—
+++
++
—
++
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CMG2
CMG4
50
10
5
++++
++++
+++
++++
++++
+++
++++
++++
+++
++++
+++
+++
++++
+++
++
++++
+++
++
+++
+++
++
+++
++
+
++
+
+
—
—
—
+
50
10
5
++++
++++
+++
++++
++++
+++
++++
++++
+++
++++
+++
+++
++++
+++
++
++++
+++
++
+++
+++
++
+++
++
+
++
++
—
—
—
a
All FSL constructs have A trisaccharide and DOPE as the lipid tail.
Serologic reactions observed against dilutions of monoclonal anti-A in gel reaction cards and scored as ++++ (maximal agglutination), +++ (strong), ++ (medium), + (weak),
b
(equivocal) and — (unreactive).
c
Spacers are as described in Chart S2.
(Scheme 2 and Table 4). It was found that at the 5
l
M level blood
grant 10-04-01693a. The authors thank D Blake, D Heathcote & E
Eriksson for unpublished data.
group A trisaccharide with the 1.9 nm short-spacer showed med-
ium serological reactivity with monoclonal anti-A when diluted
1:2, while with the longer 7.2 nm spacing of FSL-Atri-CMG2 gave
equivalent reactivity at an antibody dilution of 1:64. Further
increasing the length of the spacer to 11.5 nm (e.g., Atri-CMG4)
did not improve serological reactivity (Table 4), and is interpreted
that a spacer of >7 nm was adequate to induce maximal serological
reactivity at the red cell membrane. Neutralizing the charge on the
spacer by per-methylation of –COOH groups did not influence the
serological results.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
1. Sneath, J.; Sneath, P. Nature 1955, 176, 172.
2. Marcus, D.; Cass, L. Science 1969, 164, 553–554.
3. Renton, P.; Hancock, J. Vox Sang. 1962, 7, 33–38.
4. Final comments
4. Frame, T.; Carroll, T.; Korchagina, E.; Bovin, N.; Henry, S. Transfusion 2007, 47,
876–882.
5. Blake, D. A.; Bovin, N. V.; Bess, D.; Henry, S. M. J. Vis. Exp. 2011, 54, e3289.
The ability to modify the glyco-landscape of living cells is ex-
pected to be a useful tool in understanding the involvement of spe-
cific glycoconjugates in biological settings.27 The glyco-landscape
of cells can certainly be modified by the direct use of glycosidases28
and glycosyltransferases29 but the actual ability to control the gly-
co-landscape by these methods is limited, and to some extent
incompletely defined. Alternatively genetic manipulation of a cell
can either inhibit or induce new glyco-landscapes30 but as glyco-
sylation is probably the most complex secondary gene event in a
cell, the outcome is unpredictable and poorly controlled. Direct
covalent labeling of glycoconjugates to the cell surface although
possible has significant risks in affecting both the vitality and func-
tionality of the modified cells. The alternative approach as shown
here is to use FSL constructs. Because FSL constructs can be con-
trollable and are synthesized and designed to have specific fea-
tures, they are expected to provide a useful alternative method
for altering the glyco-landscape of living cells.
6. Henry, S. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2009, 16, 467–472.
7. Hult, A. K.; Frame, T.; Chesla, S.; Henry, S.; Olsson, M. L. Transfusion 2012, 52,
8. Oliver, C.; Blake, D.; Henry, S. Transfusion 2011, 51, 1723–1730. http://
9. Oliver, C.; Blake, D.; Henry, S. Transfusion 2011, 51, 2664–2675. http://
10. Harrison, A. L.; Olsson, M. L.; Brad Jones, R.; Ramkumar, S.; Sakac, D.;
Binnington, B.; Henry, S.; Lingwood, C. A.; Branch, D. R. Glycobiology 2010,
27, 515–524.
11. Henry, S. M. Xenotransplantation 2005, 12, 356.
12. Hadac, E. M.; Federspiel, M. J.; Chernyy, E.; Tuzikov, A.; Korchagina, E.; Bovin, N.
13. Heathcote, D.; Carroll, T.; Wang, J. J.; Flower, R.; Rodionov, I.; Tuzikov, A.; Bovin,
N.; Henry, S. Transfusion 2010, 50, 635–641.
14. Georgakopoulos, T.; Komarraju, S.; Henry, S.; Bertolini, J. Vox Sang. 2011, 102,
15. Bovin, N. K.; Chinarev, A. A.; Tuzikov, A. B. Multiligand Constructs. World
International Property Organization, Publication Number WO/2010/043230,
2010.
16. Turner, R. E.; Lin, P. Y.; Cowman, M. K. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1988, 265, 484–
495.
17. Korchagina, E. Y.; Bovin, N. V. Bioorg. Khim. 1992, 18, 283–298.
18. Chinarev, A. A.; Galanina, O. E.; Bovin, N. V. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 600, 67–78.
19. Garratty, G. Vox Sang. 2008, 94, 87–95.
20. Holthius, C.; van Meer, G.; Huitema, K. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2003, 20, 231–241.
21. Kovalenko, E. I.; Khirova, E. V.; Khaidukov, S. V.; Molotkovskaya, I. M.;
Ovchinnikova, T. V.; Sapozhnikov, A. M.; Telford, W.; Vlaskin, P. A.; Bovin, N. V.
Histochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 127, 313–326.
22. Kelm, S.; Schauer, R. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1997, 175, 137–240.
23. Gambaryan, A. S.; Karasin, A. I.; Tuzikov, A. B.; Chinarev, A. A.; Pazynina, G. V.;
Bovin, N. V.; Matrosovich, M. N.; Olsen, C. W.; Klimov, A. I. Virus Res. 2005, 114,
15–22.
5. Associated content
Supporting Information. 1H NMR data for all FSL constructs.
Scheme S1 showing synthesis of DOPE with MCMG2, CMG2 and
CMG4 Spacers. Chart S1—Schematic diagrams of other FSL blood
group related structures and Chart S2 showing spacer defined dis-
tances between cell membrane and ligand. This material is avail-
Acknowledgements
24. Bontekoe, S.; Blake, D.; Heineman, M. J.; Williams, E. C.; Johnson, N.; Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews, 2010, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD007421. doi:http://
The study was supported in part by the Russian Academy of Sci-
ences Presidium Program ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ and RFBR