crystallography of 5e.z As anticipated, regioselective trans-
diaxial epoxide opening led to the formation of 4b-amino-3a-ols
5 and none of the 3b-amino-4a-ols were detected.
2a-(1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-5a-androstan-3,17-dione: 22H30N2O2,
C
M
c
=
=
354.48, orthorhombic, 8.1193(9), b = 11.3485(12),
a
=
21.282(2) A, V = 1961.0(4) A3, T = 298(2) K, space group P212121,
Z = 4, final R indices [I 4 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0497, wR2 = 0.1169;
R indices (all data): R1 = 0.0584, wR2 = 0.1223, CCDC 695665. For
5e: C23H37NO3, M = 375.54, orthorhombic, a = 8.3064(5), b =
11.8271(7), c = 21.4585(14) A, V = 2108.1(2) A3, T = 298(2) K,
space group P212121, Z = 4, final R indices [I 4 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0488,
wR2 = 0.1236; R indices (all data): R1 = 0.0663, wR2 = 0.1334,
CCDC 695664.w
Using water as a solvent, zinc catalysts were more effective
than some other water-soluble Lewis acids such as AlCl3 and
SnCl4 with respect to yield or reaction time. We observed that
Zn(ClO4)2 was as potent as ZnCl2 although we do not
recommend the former owing to the danger of explosion.
When ZnCl2 was not added and/or H2O was replaced with
nonpolar or highly dipolar solvents (diethyl ether, toluene,
THF and DMF), it resulted in very little or no product
formation. Therefore, the ZnCl2–H2O system appears to
be crucial for the reaction outcome. The best yields of 5 were
obtained when 3 eq. of amine and 2 eq. of ZnCl2 in water were
used. With this catalytic system the reactions were carried out
readily. In most cases, the desired products were directly
extracted from the aqueous phase with CH2Cl2.
1 (a) C. L. Hewett, D. S. Savage, J. J. Lewis and M. F. Sugrue,
J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 1964, 16, 765; (b) C. J. Daniell, M. Cross,
J. R. Sneyd, P. Thompson and C. J. Andrews, Br. J. Anaesth.,
1996, 76, 586; (c) C. Hill-Venning, J. A. Peters and H. Callachan,
Neuropharmacology, 1996, 35, 1209; (d) A. Anderson, A. C. Boyd,
A. Byford and D. K. Gemmell, J. Med. Chem., 1997, 40, 1668.
2 (a) Q. He and D. Jiang, Leuk. Res., 1999, 23, 369; (b) Q. He and
X. Na, Leuk. Res., 2001, 25, 455; (c) J. Roy, P. Deroy and
D. Poirier, J. Comb. Chem., 2007, 9, 347.
3 (a) W. R. Buckett, C. L. Hewett and D. S. Savage, J. Med. Chem.,
1973, 16, 1116; (b) Z. Tuba, S. Maho and E. S. Vizi, Curr. Med.
Chem., 2002, 9, 1507; (c) C. Lee, Pharmacol. Ther., 2003, 98, 143;
(d) L. Gyermek, Med. Res. Rev., 2005, 25, 610; (e) D. P. Zlotos,
Mini-Rev. Med. Chem., 2005, 5, 595.
4 (a) M. Numazawa, M. Nagaoka and Y. Osawa, J. Org. Chem.,
1982, 47, 4024; (b) S. C. Smith and C. H. Heathcock, J. Org.
Chem., 1992, 57, 6379; (c) D. B. Salunke, B. G. Hazra,
R. G. Gonnade and V. S. Pore, Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 3605;
(d) S. Boonyarattanakalin, S. E. Martin and B. R. Peterson,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 11463.
For the unsymmetrical 3,4a-epoxide of a rigid steroid, the
regioselectivity of b-face attachment to the 4-position should
be principally influenced by the electronic and steric factors
associated with the epoxide itself. The role of the water as the
reaction medium is still not clear. Hydrophobic and hydrogen
bonding interactions and polarity are the main factors that
influence the reactivity.18 Lewis acids in water can generate
high concentrations of aqua ions and have a great affinity for
epoxides and nucleophiles.19 Catalysis by water-soluble Lewis
acids possibly depends on the ability of the catalysts to tolerate
water on the one hand and to remain active on the other.20 We
propose an SN2 mechanism for these processes by comparison
of the reaction conditions with those reported in the literature
for azidolysis, halolysis and thiolysis of epoxides.21 The reac-
tions proceeded readily in hot water and gave a single product,
although one or more of the reactants, as well as the product,
appeared to be insoluble in this medium. It may be explained
that when poorly dissolved in water, the free energies of
organic molecules are substantially greater and often result
in increased reactivity, which compensates for the low con-
centration of the participants.22
5 Y. J. Abul-Hajj, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 3380.
6 (a) C. Djerassi and R. R. Scholz, J. Org. Chem., 1948, 13, 697;
(b) C. Djerassi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71, 1003; (c) M. Yanagita
and A. Tabara, J. Org. Chem., 1953, 18, 792; (d) C. Djerassi and
D. Maraball, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 3986; (e) G. Frangatos
and A. Taurins, Can. J. Chem., 1961, 39, 410; (f) E. W. Warnhoff,
J. Org. Chem., 1962, 27, 4587; (g) Y. J. Abul-Hajj, J. Org. Chem.,
1986, 51, 3059; (h) J. Mann and B. Pietrzak, Tetrahedron, 1989, 45,
1549; (i) P. K. Sharma and A. Akhila, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B:
Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem., 1991, 30B, 554.
7 (a) A. Hassner and P. Catsoulacos, J. Org. Chem., 1967, 32, 549;
(b) C. H. Heathcock and S. C. Smith, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59, 6828.
8 (a) R. M. Hanson, Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 437; (b) N. Azizi and
M. R. Saidi, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3649; (c) Shivani, B. Pujala and
A. K. Chakraborti, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 720, 3713 and references
therein.
9 S. C. Bergmeier, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 2561.
10 E. J. T. da Silva, F. M. Roleira, M. L. S. Melo, A. S. C. Neves,
J. A. Paixao, M. J. Almeida and L. C. R. Andrade, Steroids, 2002,
67, 311.
11 (a) C. L. Hewett and D. S. Savage, J. Chem. Soc. C, 1968, 1134;
(b) W. R. Buckett and C. L. Hewett, J. Med. Chem., 1973, 16, 1116;
(c) Q. He and Y. H. Xu, Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 1992, 27, 101.
12 W. S. Murphy and B. Sarsam, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1999,
22, 3311.
13 A. Horvath, R. Skoda-Foldes, S. Maho, Z. Berente and L. Kollar,
Steroids, 2006, 71, 706–711.
14 (a) K. Ponsold, W. Schade and M. Wunderwald, J. Prakt. Chem.
(Leipzig), 1975, 317, 307; (b) V. Agarwal, S. Husain and
K. C. Gupta, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 1995, 72, 639.
In summary, we have demonstrated general and efficient
methods for the preparation of 4-aminosteroids. The present
method using K2CO3 as the activator for 4a-aminosteroids is a
simple one-step reaction involving easily prepared starting
materials. The described method using the ZnCl2–H2O system
for the preparation of 4b-aminosteroids offers specific advan-
tages with operational simplicity, simple purification proce-
dure, high yields and complete regioselectivity. The present
work offers interesting and new investigational insights into
designing novel, improved compounds for further research
and development of aminosteroidal drugs.
15 D. Thibeault and D. Poirier, Synlett, 2003, 1192.
16 J. R. Hanson, C. Uyanik and F. Viel, J. Chem. Res., Synop., 1998,
3, 118.
17 M. Svoboda, M. Tichy and J. Sicher, Tetrahedron Lett., 1962, 3, 717.
18 S. W. Benson and E. D. Siebert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4269.
19 D. Amantini, F. Fringuelli, O. Piermatti, S. Torttoioli and
L. Vaccaro, ARKIVOC, 2002, 11, 293.
20 C. M. Kleiner and P. R. Schreiner, Chem. Commun., 2006, 4315.
21 (a) F. Fringuelli, F. Pizzo and L. Vaccaro, Synlett, 2000, 311;
(b) F. Fringuelli, F. Pizzo, S. Tortoioli and L. Vaccaro, Green
Chem., 2003, 5, 436 and references therein.
Notes and references
z Crystal data for 3a: C21H33NO2, M = 331.48, orthorhombic, a =
5.9317(4), b = 12.8974(9), c = 24.7747(17) A, V = 1895.4(2) A3, T =
294(2) K, space group P212121, Z = 4, final R indices [I 4 2s(I)]:
R1 = 0.0566, wR2 = 0.1178; R indices (all data): R1 = 0.0956,
wR2 = 0.1316, CCDC 682757. For 3e: C23H35NO2, M = 357.52,
orthorhombic, a = 7.7287(7), b = 8.6066(8), c = 29.9778(16) A, V =
1994.1(3) A3, T = 296(2) K, space group P212121, Z = 4, final R
22 (a) H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2004; (b) J. J. Gajewski, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997,
30, 219.
indices [I 4 2s(I)]: R1 = 0.0529, wR2 = 0.1207; R indices
(all data): R1 = 0.0867, wR2 = 0.1350, CCDC 682758. For
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
Chem. Commun., 2009, 1037–1039 | 1039