M. Hangyou et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1475–1477
1477
1
OH
a
OH
5
O
18
4
OMOM
13
OMOM
13
b
S
S
12
8
8
12
11
20
11
R
+
R
R
OH
14
6
10
O
20
6
R
OH
1
14
OMOM
OMOM
17
15
6
19
20
20
OH
R
OH
12
R
8
OH
S
11
S
11
8
6
13
13
17
R
c, d, e, f
17
6
R
12
+
14
14
5
5
O
O
1
O
O
1
20
Scheme 4. Alkynylation of C-6–C-13 segment (15) with C-14–C-20 segment (6) and ring-closing methathesis of 19. Reagents and conditions: (a) PDC, DMF, rt, 7 h, (61%); (b)
n-BuLi, BF3ꢀOEt2, THF ꢁ78 °C, 20 min (99%); (c) H2, Lindlar’s Pd-cat. quinoline, benzene, rt, 13 h; (d) 4, EDC, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (e) Grubbs 1st generation catalyst CH2Cl2, 2 h and (f)
p-TsOHꢀH2O, MeOH, rt, 48 h (1 (4%) and 20 (2%) for 4 steps, respectively).
MTPAO
References and notes
+0.06
+0.07
-0.03
-0.03 -0.12
13
0.00
0.00
11 +0.06
6
+0.08
S12
O
1. Takahashi, Y.; Kubota, T.; Kobayashi, J. Heterocycles 2007, 72, 567–572.
2. Chattopadhyay, A.; Mamdapur, V. R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 585–587.
3. (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155–4156; (b) Ireland, R. E.;
Liu, L. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2899.
-0.04
8
-0.09
-0.01
O
OTBS
4. Keck allylation13 using allyltributyltin (2 equiv) and 20 mol % catalyst prepared
from Ti(iPrO)4 and (R)-BINOL did not proceed.
Figure 2.
C-11 of alcohol 17.
D
d Values [
D
d (in ppm) = dS ꢁ dR] obtained for (S)- and (R)-MTPA esters at
5. Yanagisawa, A.; Kageyama, H.; Nakatsuka, Y.; Asakawa, K.; Matsumoto, Y.;
Yamamoto, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3701–3703.
6. Since removal of benzyl group proceeded in low yield at a later stage, the
hydroxy groups were protected as MOM ether.
7. Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
4092–4096.
8. Nakanishi, A.; Mori, K. Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem. 2005, 69, 1007–1013.
9. Yamaguchi, M.; Hirao, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 391–394.
10. Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 100–110.
11. Because of unstability of synthetic intermediates from 19 to 1, the yield was
low.
The ester was subjected to RCM by using Grubbs’ first-generation
catalyst10 followed by removal of MOM groups to furnish amphidi-
nolactone A (1).11 The synthetic material 1 was spectroscopically
(IR, 1H and 13C NMR, HRMS)12 identical with natural product and
also had an optical rotation, ½a D21
ꢁ65 (c 0.033, benzene), in good
ꢂ
agreement with the literature value [lit.,1
½
a 1D9
ꢂ
ꢁ62 (c 0.065,
12. 1: colorless oil; ½a D21
ꢂ
ꢁ65 (c 0.033, benzene); IR (film) 3390 and 1720 cmꢁ1
;
benzene)]. Thus, the absolute stereochemistry of amphidinolac-
tone A (1) was established as 8R, 11S and 12R.
1H NMR (600 MHz, C6D6) d 5.66 (1H, m, H-6), 5.59 (1H, m, H-15), 5.59 (1H,
m, H-14), 5.54 (1H, ddd, J = 15.7, 7.5, 0.7 Hz, H-9), 5.46 (1H, m, H-17), 5.46
(1H, m, H-18), 5.30 (1H, ddd, J = 10.7, 9.6, 4.3 Hz, H-5), 5.24 (1H, ddd,
J = 15.7, 7.5, 0.7 Hz, H-10), 5.03 (1H, ddd, J = 8.9, 7.6, 0.7 Hz, H-12), 4.00 (1H,
m, H-8), 3.83 (1H, m, H-11), 2.88 (1H, m, H-16), 2.68 (1H, m, H-13a), 2.51
(1H, m, H-13b), 2.35 (1H, m, H-4a), 2.31 (1H, m, H-7a), 2.22 (1H, m, H-7b),
2.19 (1H, m, H-2a), 2.11 (1H, m, H-2b), 2.06 (1H, m, H-19), 1.87 (1H, m, H-
4b), 1.26 (1H, m, H-3b), 0.96 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, H-20); 13C NMR (150 MHz,
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Oka and A. Tokumitsu, Center for Instrumental
Analysis, Hokkaido University, for ESIMS and FABMS measure-
ments. This work was partly supported by a from the Uehara
Memorial Foundation and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research
from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Tech-
nology of Japan.
C6D6)
d 171.74, 136.68, 132.18, 131.24, 131.20, 130.74, 127.45, 125.11,
124.98, 74.00, 73.87, 72.39, 35.92, 32.07, 29.50, 26.00, 25.61, 22.96, 20.89,
14.40; ESIMS (positive) m/z 357 (M+Na)+; HRESIMS m/z 357.2036 (M+Na)+,
calcd for C20H30O4Na, 357.2042.
13. Keck, G. E.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Grier, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6543–6544.