ˇ ´
Z. M. Bugarcic et al.: Efficient Route to Phenylselenoethers
988
the fact that the additive can bind the counter ion from
the reagent (Xꢂ from PhSeX), increase electrophilicity
of the PhSe group facilitating the subseqent nucleo-
philic attack of the oxygen to form the desired ether,
and eliminates Xꢂ as a concurrent of the hydroxyl
group in the cyclization step.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Ministry of Science, Technology
and Development of the Republic of Serbia (Grant: 142 008B).
References
[1] Elliott MC (2002) J Chem Soc 1: 2301
[2] Harmange JC, Figadere B (1993) Tetrahedron Asymetry
4: 1711
[3] Wesley JW (1982) Polyether Antibiotics Naturally
Occurring Acid Ionophores, Marcel Decker, New York,
Vols I and II
[4] Painter GR, Presman BC (1982) Top Curr Chem 101:
83
[5] Still WC, Hauck P, Kempf D (1987) Tetrahedron Lett
28: 2817
[6] Smith PW, Still WC (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110: 7917
[7] Shimizu Y, Scheuer P (1978) Marine Natural Products.
Academic press, New York, Vol I, p 1
[8] Ellis S (1985) Toksikon 23: 469
[9] Sakemi S, Higa T, Jefford CW, Bernardinelli G (1986)
Tetrahedron Lett 27: 4287
[10] Suzuki T, Suzuki A, Furusaki T, Matsumoto A, Kato A,
Imanaka Y, Kurosawa E (1985) Tetrahedron Lett
26: 1329
[11] Corley DG, Herb RR, Moore E, Scheuer PJ, Paul VJ
(1988) J Org Chem 53: 3644
In conclusion, it appears that the above described
conditions for the cyclization of D4- and D5-alkenols
to five-membered and six-membered ethers are
more advantageous in terms of time and yield than
those previously reported for the same reagents. In
addition, other conditions will be tested to increase
the yields for the less effective alkenols. In view of
the above we considered this improved procedure for
preparing cyclic ethers and related systems as the sim-
plest and superior to those currently available. As for
the yields of cyclic ethers, the procedure described
in this article gave better results than reported pro-
cedures. Accompanied by other merits, such as the
mildness of the reaction conditions and the simplic-
ity of the experimental procedure, our procedure is
the most attractive one for the conversion of alkenols
into oxacyclic compounds. Moreover, we are confi-
dent that this procedure will be of general use for a
facile synthesis of various heterocycles.
[12] Cohran VM (1958) Physiology of Fungi, Wiley,
New York
[13] Schreiber SL, Kelly SE, Porco JA, Sanmakia T, Suh EM
(1988) J Am Chem Soc 110: 6210
´
´
Experimental
[14] Gonzalez AG, Martin JD, Martin VS, Norte M, Perez R,
Ruano JZ, Drexler SA, Clardy J (1982) Tetrahedron
38: 1009
Gas–liquid chromatography (GLC) analysis was performed
with a Deni instrument, model 2000 with capillary apolar
columns. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were run with CDCl3 as
the solvent on a Varian Gemini 200 MHz NMR spectro-
meter. IR spectra were obtained with Perkin-Elmer Model
137B and Nicolet 7000 FT spectrophotometers. Dornis and
Colbe performed the microanalyses, which agreed favour-
ably with the calculated values. Thin-layer chromatography
(TLC) was carried out on 0.25 mm E. Merck precoated
silica gel plates (60F-254) using UV light for visualization.
For column chromatography, E. Merck silica gel (60, parti-
cle size 0.063–0.200 mm) was used.
[15] Paulimer C (1986) In: Baldwin IE (ed) Selenium
Reagents and Intermediates in Organic Synthesis.
Pergamon press, New York, Vol IV
[16] Paulimer C (1987) In: Patai S (ed) Chemistry of
Organic Selenium and Tellurium Compounds. Wiley,
New York, Vol II
[17] Tiecco M (2000) Electrophilic Selenium, Selenocyliza-
tions. Top Curr Chem 208: 7
[18] Konstantinovic S, Bugarcic Z, Milosavljevic S, Schroth
G, Mihailovic MLJ, (1992) Liebigs Ann Chem 261
[19] Mojsilovic B, Bugarcic Z (2001) Heteroatom Chem
12: 475
General Procedure
[20] Bugarcic Z, Gavrilovic M (2003) Monatsh Chem
134: 1359
[21] Bugarcic Z, Mojsilovic B (2004) Heteroatom Chem
15: 146
[22] Bugarcic Z, Dunkic J, Mojsilovic B (2004) Heteroatom
Chem 6: 468
[23] Petrovic Z, Mojsilovic B, Bugarcic Z (2001) J Mol Cat
A: Chem 12: 475
All reactions were carried out on a 1 mmol scale. To a magnet-
ically stirred solution of 1 mmol alkenol and 0.1 mmol or
1 mmol catalyst in 5 cm3 dry CH2Cl2 0.212 g solid PhSeCl
(1.1mmol) or 0.260g PhSeBr (1.1 mmol) were added at room
temperature. The reaction went to completion within a few
minutes. The pale yellow solution was washed with saturated
NaHCO3 and H2O. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4,
concentrated, and chromatographed. The product was obtained
after the eluation of traces of diphenyl diselenide from a silica
gel-CH2Cl2 column. All products were characterized and iden-
tified on the basis of their spectral data [18].
´
[24] Flohe L, Gu
¨zler EA, Schock HH (1973) FEBS Lett
32: 132
[25] Rotruck JT, Pope AL, Ganther AE, Swanson AB,
Hafeman DG, Hoekstra WG (1973) Science 179: 588