176
M. Lahtinen et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 85–86 (2013) 169–177
Table 4
˛-O-4/ˇ-O-4. When reactions were terminated with NaN3 to exam-
ine the oxidation products of coniferyl alcohol as a function of time,
this laccase inhibitor was observed not to be as effective in the IL
as in water solutions. Consumption of coniferyl alcohol and for-
mation of oxidation products were clearly slower in the presence
of [Amim]Cl at later stages of the reaction, although the reduction
of laccase activity caused by the [Amim]Cl was at least partially
compensated by increasing the enzyme dosage.
Average molar masses of high-fraction DHPs from laccase-catalyzed oxidation of
coniferyl alcohol in 0% and 40% [Amim]Cl.
DHP
Mn (103 g/mol)
Mw (103 g/mol)
Mz (103 g/mol)
Mw/Mn
0% [Amim]Cl
40% [Amim]Cl
1.1
2.1
1.4
4.1
2.2
6.9
1.3
2.0
Table 5
The DHPs formed from coniferyl alcohol in 0% or 40% [Amim]Cl
differed already in their visual appearance, the one formed in the
presence of IL being denser and having a darker color. The 2D NMR
analysis revealed that the DHP formed in the presence of [Amim]Cl
contained less ˇ-O-4, slightly less ˇ-5 structures and more ˇ–ˇ
structures. Obviously, the DHP formed in the presence of [Amim]Cl
contained more 5–5 bonds, than the DHP formed in the absence of
[Amim]Cl.
Clearly, polymerization reactions catalyzed by laccases can be
performed in the presence of ionic liquids, such as [Amim]Cl, to
enhance the solubility of the substrate and the product, and to form
more highly polymerized lignin-based materials. Interestingly, the
chemical structure of the formed polymer was also structurally
different from that formed in the absence of the ionic liquid.
Relative amounts of structural units in DHPs formed in 0% and 40% [Amim]Cl from
Q-HSQC spectra [42]. The amounts were acquired, assuming each structural unit
contains one methoxyl (OMe) group, from HSQC-NMR H/C correlation volumes
using the formula: V(Hx/Cx)/[3/V(HOMe/COMe)]. The slight inaccuracy of the inte-
gration due to overlapping signals was found insignificant for the final results.
Structural unit
Correlation/ppm (H/C)
40% [Amim]Cl
1
2
3
4
5
5.60/86.9 (H˛/C˛)
4.70/84.7 (H˛/C˛)
5.96/73.2 (H˛/C˛)
5.52/78.7 (Hˇ/Cˇ)a
4.87/79.5 (Hˇ/Cˇ)b
0.29
0.53
0.03
0.02
0.30
0.20
0.73
0.02
0.02
0.08
a
Volume of 5 Hˇ/Cˇ subtracted from total volume at 5.52/78.7 ppm to acquire
volume of 4 Hˇ/Cˇ.
b
Volume of 3 H˛/C˛ subtracted from total volume at 4.87/79.5 ppm to acquire
volume of 5 Hˇ/Cˇ.
Acknowledgements
merized material.
Financial support from the Academy of Finland (grants 122534
and 132150) and Forestcluster Ltd. are gratefully acknowledged.
Expansions of the HSQC spectra of both DHPs, and expansion
of the HSQC-TOCSY spectrum of DHP formed in 0% [Amim]Cl are
shown in Fig. 4. The NMR assignments are based on the values found
in literature [45]. The H˛/C˛, Hˇ/Cˇ and Hꢁ/Cꢁ correlations of ˇ-5
(1) and ˇ–ˇ (2) structures separated well in the HSQC spectrum.
Also, ˇ-O-4 structure (3) could be assigned based on correlation
at 5.96/73.2 ppm (H˛/C˛) in HSQC. Correlations of ˛-C O/ˇ-O-4
(4) and ˛-O-4/ˇ-O-4 (5) structures overlapped in the HSQC spec-
trum (Hˇ/Cˇ of structure 4 with H˛/C˛ of structure 5, Hˇ/Cˇ of
based on patterns in the HSQC-TOCSY spectrum. The characteris-
tic Hˇ/Cˇ correlation at 4.14/82.5 ppm indicating trans-isomer of
dibenzodioxocin structure [46] was not observed.
Based on the quantitative Q-HSQC spectra (Fig. 4, and inte-
gration results Table 5), there were clear structural differences
between the DHPs formed in 0% [Amim]Cl and 40% [Amim]Cl. The
DHP formed in 40% [Amim]Cl contained less ˇ-O-4 structures (3–5)
and slightly less ˇ-5 structures (1) than DHP formed in 0% [Amim]Cl.
Also, the DHP formed in 40% [Amim]Cl, contained more ˇ–ˇ struc-
tures (2) than the one formed in 0% [Amim]Cl. Obviously, based
on higher molecular weight, the DHP formed in the presence of
different variables are known to affect the frequencies of different
bond-types in DHPs: the rate at which monomers are supplied and
radicals are formed, the pH, the presence of polysaccharides and the
size of the growing polymer [2,44]. The analysis of oligomeric prod-
ucts revealed that the structural differences were formed already
at the early stages of oxidation (Section 3.3), but the formation of a
larger polymer in the presence of the IL probably also affected the
structural differences.
References
[1] E. Sjöström, Wood Chemistry—Fundamentals and Applications, Academic
Press, Inc., Orlando, Florida, 1981.
[2] J. Ralph, G. Brunow, W. Boerjan, Lignins, in: Encylopedia of Life Sci-
[3] H. Xie, T. Shi, Holzforschung 60 (2006) 509–512.
[4] I. Kilpeläinen, H. Xie, A. King, M. Granstrom, S. Heikkinen, D.S. Argyropoulos, J.
Agric. Food Chem. 55 (2007) 9142–9148.
[5] Y. Pu, N. Jiang, A.J. Ragauskas, J. Wood Chem. Technol. 27 (2007) 23–33.
[6] H. Xie, A. King, I. Kilpelainen, M. Granstrom, D.S. Argyropoulos, Biomacro-
molecules 8 (2007) 3740–3748.
[7] N. Sun, M. Rahman, Y. Qin, M.L. Maxim, H. Rodríquez, R.D. Rogers, Green Chem.
11 (2009) 646–655.
[8] R.P. Swatloski, S.K. Spear, J.D. Holbrey, R.D. Rogers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002)
4974–4975.
[9] H. Zhang, J. Wu, J. Zhang, J. He, Macromolecules 38 (2005) 8272–8277.
[10] P. Mäki-Arvela, I. Anugwom, P. Virtanen, R. Sjöholm, J.P. Mikkola, Ind. Crops
Prod. 32 (2010) 175–201.
[11] S.H. Lee, T.V. Doherty, R.J. Linhardt, J.S. Dordick, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102 (2009)
1368–1376.
[12] M. Zavrel, D. Bross, M. Funke, J. Büchs, A.J. Spiess, Bioresour. Technol. 100 (2009)
2580–2587.
[13] A. Pinkert, K.N. Marsh, S. Pang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49 (2010) 11121–11130.
[14] A.W.T. King, J. Asikkala, I. Mutikainen, P. Järvi, I. Kilpeläinen, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 50 (2011) 6301–6305.
[15] R.P. Chandra, A.J. Ragauskas, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 30 (2002) 855–861.
[16] S. Grönqvist, K. Rantanen, R. Alén, M.-L. Mattinen, J. Buchert, L. Viikari, Holz-
forschung 60 (2006) 503–508.
[17] A.M. Mayer, R.C. Staples, Phytochemistry 60 (2002) 551–565.
[18] P. Sharma, R. Goel, N. Capalash, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 23 (2007)
823–832.
[19] E.I. Solomon, U.M. Sundaram, T.E. Machonkin, Chem. Rev. 96 (1996) 2563–2605.
[20] C.F. Thurston, Microbiology 140 (1994) 19–26.
[21] C. Felby, B.R. Nielsen, P.O. Olesen, L.H. Skibsted, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48
(1997) 459–464.
[22] T. Higuchi, Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 80 (2004) 204–214.
[23] C. Crestini, L. Jurasek, D. Argyropoulos, Chem.—Eur. J. 9 (2003) 5371–5378.
[24] M. Lahtinen, K. Kruus, P. Heinonen, J. Sipilä, J. Agric. Food Chem. 57 (2009)
8357–8365.
[25] D. Areskogh, J. Li, P. Nousiainen, G. Gellerstedt, J. Sipilä, G. Henriksson, Holz-
forschung 64 (2010) 21–34.
[26] N. Jain, A. Kumar, S. Chauhan, S.M.S. Chauhan, Tetrahedron 61 (2005)
1015–1060.
[27] Z. Yang, W. Pan, Enzyme Microb. Technol. 37 (2005) 19–28.
[28] F. van Rantwijk, R.A. Sheldon, Chem. Rev. 107 (2007) 2757–2785.
[29] M.B. Turner, S.K. Spear, J.G. Huddleston, J.D. Holbrey, R.D. Rogers, Green Chem.
5 (2003) 443.
4. Conclusions
The activity of M. albomyces laccase decreased with increas-
ing [Amim]Cl concentration. The pH scale, in which M. albomyces
laccase remained its activity was narrowed and the pH optimum
shifted to a more acidic value with increasing [Amim]Cl concentra-
tion.
The products formed in laccase-catalyzed oxidation of coniferyl
alcohol were identified as ˇ-5, ˇ–ˇ, ˇ-O-4, ˛-C O/ˇ-O-4 and