G. M. Schaaf et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 50 (2009) 1928–1933
1929
O
NaSMe
or
O
X
O
O
Ar
OH
O
O
2
O
O
O
S
S
Ar
S
Ar
Me
Na
R
OH
1
4
3
cross
coupling
R = aryl or aliphatic
X = halogen
HAR
HAR
X
HAR = hetroaryl (pyridine
or diazine)
O
O
S
HAR
Me
5
Scheme 1. Strategies for sulfone synthesis.
Table 1
Reaction of 2-vinyl pyridine with sodium methanesulfinate
vided the sulfone in only 30 minutes in refluxing EtOH. Reducing
the equivalents of TFA to one and decreasing the temperature to
room temperature still provided the product in excellent yield in
only 4 h (entry 12). Several Lewis acids, including FeCl3, AlCl3,
and TiCl4, were surveyed with DCM as the solvent. Using BF3ÁEt2O
(entry 13) provided the most promising results and suggests that
Lewis acids could be used as an alternative to protic acids.
O
O
S
O
O
Na
S
(5 eq)
N
N
6
7
Next, we included pyridines and diazines of various substitution
patterns (Table 2). Substrates containing an assortment of functional
groups were included. Acetic acid and TFA were chosen since they of-
fer complementary profiles. Flexibility in the equivalents and
strengths of these acids balanced with the choice of temperature
and time offer a range of conditions to satisfy substrate compatibility.
The basicity of the nitrogen of the heterocycle must be taken
into consideration. Only substrates with a pKa greater than ꢀ5
should be significantly protonated by HOAc and participate in
the reaction. These substrates generally include pyridine and other
electron-rich pyridines. Trifluoroacetic acid is strong enough to
protonate less basic substrates, such as pyridines with electron-
withdrawing groups and most substituted diazines. Additionally,
an appreciable amount of TFA is likely consumed neutralizing so-
dium methanesulfinate to form methanesulfinic acid. Thus, for less
basic substrates it is necessary to add TFA (8 equiv) in excess of the
amount of sodium methanesulfinate (5 equiv) to assure free acid in
the reaction mixture.
While several of the vinyl pyridines are commercially available,
most substrates were synthesized from the corresponding halide
and Molander’s vinyltrifluoroborate.12 The location of the vinyl
group on the substrate is critical. Exposure of the 4-vinyl pyridine
to acetic acid and sodium methanesulfinate (entry 1) provided the
product in excellent yield. As expected, 3-vinyl pyridines, even ba-
sic ones such as 8b, failed to render any product. Consequently, dif-
ferentiation between two vinyl groups is possible. Prepared from
the 2,3-dibromopyridine, divinyl pyridine 8c reacts only at the vi-
nyl group on the 2-position to provide 9c exclusively. In the pres-
ence of TFA, a wide range of electron-poor and electron-rich vinyl
pyridines are converted to the ethyl methyl sulfone (entries 4–7)
with less basic nitropyridine 8g requiring TFA for conversion. Inter-
estingly, the Boc group of aminopyridine 8h remains intact under
TFA conditions to cleanly provide the sulfone. Pyridyls 8i and 8j
which contain substituted vinyl groups achieved only moderate
success. Both 2-vinyl quinoline and quinoxaline (entries 11 and
12) failed to undergo conversion using acetic acid, but were con-
verted in high yield in the presence of TFA. Interestingly, 2-vinyl-
pyrazine 8m was converted to the sulfone in the presence of
HOAc even though it is only weakly basic.13 The reaction pro-
ceeded in excellent yield for a variety of 2-vinyl pyrimidines (en-
tries 14–16), including the scaffold for a kinase inhibitor (8q).14
Entry
Acids
Eq. acid
Time (h)
Temp (°C)
Solvent
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
HOAc
H3BO4
HCl
100
5
1
0.5
10
5
5
5
10
5
5
2
2.5
20
24
6
24
24
24
24
8
60
60
60
60
rt
60
55
35
60
60
60
rt
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
Toluene
THF
DCM
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
DCM
88
88
91
45
79
57
29
85
85
85
89
85
77
TFA
TFA
BF3ÁEt2O
0.5
4
24
1
2
À78 to rt
sodium methanesulfinate was standard throughout the experi-
ments.10 In entry 1, a large excess of acetic acid in ethanol11
(ꢀ1:1 HOAc/EtOH) affects this conversion at 60 °C in only 2 h.
Decreasing the amount of HOAc to 5 equiv (entry 2) had little effect
on the outcome of the reaction, providing the sulfone product in
excellent yield in 2.5 h. The reaction time is extended to 20 h if
only 1 equiv of acetic acid is used. This reaction can also be carried
out at room temperature (entry 5) but requires extended reaction
times and additional acid. Exposure to substoichiometric amounts
of HOAc resulted in incomplete conversion (entry 4) and recovered
starting material. In the absence of acid no reaction occurred (data
not shown).
Several additional solvents were explored using 5 equiv of
HOAc. Toluene as a solvent (entry 6) provided the product in mod-
est yield. Low conversion was observed with tetrahydrofuran as
the solvent. However, dichloromethane (entry 8) proved to be an
attractive aprotic alternative to EtOH, providing 7 in 85% yield, al-
beit with an extended reaction time.
We explored additional acids. Exposure of the reactants to
H3BO4 (entry 9) in EtOH at reflux provided 7 in excellent yield
but with higher loading (10 equiv). Hydrochloric acid (entry 10)
worked well, though it required longer reaction time compared
to HOAc. Gratifyingly, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) substantially in-
creased the efficiency and versatility of the process, especially
compared to HOAc. Substituting 5 equiv of TFA for the acid pro-