R. Pontiggia et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2806–2808
2807
Figure 1. Synthesis of 20-C-methylphosphoramidite (14) from fructose.
o-
c
-lactone (1, Fig. 1) was prepared, starting from fructose and using
yield. Then, the 50-position was protected using DMT-Cl to give
13 in 72% yield. Finally, the phosphoramidite 14 (Fig. 1) was pre-
pared, by reaction of 13 with b-cyanoethoxy-N,N-aminochloro-
phosphine in a mixture of THF, diisopropylethylamine and CH2Cl2
under reflux, in 83% yield.
an alkaline degradation with calcium hydroxide. In our experience
the key step of this procedure is the exhaustive elimination of
remaining calcium ions by ion exchange chromatography (see
Supplementary data) and a percolation on silica gel, previous to
crystallization. In spite the low yield of this step (11%), the low cost
starting materials (food grade fructose, calcium hydroxide and
water) justifies the procedure. Positions 2- and 3- were then
protected using 2,2-dimethoxypropane to yield 2,3-di-O-isopropyl-
In order to test the enhanced acid stability of the 20-protection,
a comparative acid hydrolysis of 20-O-tetrahydropyranyl-20-C-
methyluridine (15) and compound 12 was performed using 2.5%
dichloroacetic acid in CH2Cl2.7 The remaining protected nucleoside
vs reaction time is depicted in Figure 2. As can be seen, (2-chloro-
ethoxy)ethyl protection is more stable (half life ca. 50 min) than
THP stable (half life ca. 7 min).
As a proof of concept and taking into account previous re-
sults15,6,14, we decided to synthesize a modified hammerhead ribo-
zyme carrying 20-C-methyluridine in position 7- of the catalytic
iden-2-C-methylribo-c-lactone (2, Fig. 1). This product was then
benzylated in 85% yield, to give 3 (Fig. 1). This compound was
reduced using 1.7 equivalents of DIBAL-H at ꢀ70 °C, obtaining 5-
O-benzyl-2,3-O-isopropyliden-2-C-methyl-
a,b-D
-ribose (4, Fig. 1),
practically as an equimolar anomeric mixture, in 84% yield.
Subsequently, 2,3-protection was removed using an acid resin
(DOWEX-50AG). Compound 5 was then perbenzoylated in 69%
core. In order to test its applicability we selected the ER-
a mRNA
yield, to obtain 5-O-benzyl-1,2,3-tri-O-benzoyl-2-C-methyl-
a
,b-
D
-
for the experiments in cell culture, motivated by its critical role
in the proliferation of certain estrogen-dependent mammary
breast tumors.17
ribofuranose (6, Fig. 1). This intermediate was stereoselectively
glycosylated under Vörbruggen conditions10 with uracil to give
50-O-benzyl-20,30-O-dibenzoyl-20-C-methyluridine (7, Fig. 1) in 70%
yield. The nucleoside was hydrogenated to remove the 50-protec-
tion, using Pd(OH)2/C as catalyst, practically in quantitative yield
to afford 8 (Fig. 1), which was debenzoylated by NH3(g) in ethanol,
to give 20-C-methyluridine (9, Fig. 1) in 75% yield.
For this purpose, a modified ribozyme designed to cleave the
956 nt of the mRNA of ER-
a was prepared. In order to increase
the ribozyme lifetime, the sequence was modified using 20-O-
methylnucleosides (blue capital letters captions, Fig. 3), two phos-
phorothiates at 30 and 50-ends (blue lower case, Fig. 3), the (20R)-20-
C-methyluridine (red capital letters caption, Fig. 3) and keeping
natural ribonucleotides (black captions, Fig. 3) at positions where
The next step consisted in the preparation of the corresponding
phosphoramidite. For this purpose, 30 and 50 positions were regio-
selectively acetylated. This alternative was preferred, because tra-
ditional Marckiewicz protection of positions 30 and 50, generates a
steric hindrance that hampers the access to the 20-tertiary alco-
hol.13 In this way 30,50-di-O-acetyl-20-C-methyluridine (10, Fig. 1)
was prepared from 9 in 90% yield. Then, different protective
groups, orthogonal to 50-DMT protection, were tested. Classical
tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl (TBDM) ether was attempted obtaining
negative results using either the chloride or the triflate sililating
agents. Then, (triisopropylsilyl)oxymethyl chloride (TOM-Cl),17
was tested. TOM-Cl is known to have less steric hindrance. In order
to introduce this protective group different bases (DBU, BDDDP,
BuLi) and reaction conditions (different solvents and tempera-
tures) were unsuccessfully assessed. Finally, 2-chloroethoxyethyl
ether was tested, carrying out the reaction in the absence of sol-
vent using an excess of 33 equiv of 2-chloroethylvinyl ether and
pyridonium p-toluensulfonate as catalyst. In this way product 11
(Fig. 1) was obtained in 74% yield. The next step consisted in the
removal of the acetyl groups under basic conditions to give 20-O-
(1-(2-choroethoxy)ethyl)-20-C-methyluridine (12, Fig. 1) in 83%
Figure 2. Relative acid stability of (12) and (15).