PROPERTIES OF NITRIC ACID PALLADIUM SOLUTIONS
697
data is caused by two reasons. The first of them is
tion. The main difference was that the excess of the
precipitant did not exceed 10% of the Pd(II) : DMG =
1 : 2 stoichiometry. The mother liquor and the whole
amount of the washing liquid were transferred to a
200-ml volumetric flask, and 50-ml aliquots were
titrated with a standard NaOH solution, using a mix-
ture of Phenol Red and Bromocresol Green indicators
[9]. According to the data of [9], its color changes
at pH 7.2 0.2. It was found experimentally that the
use of indicators with a higher pT results in regular
overestimation of results. When calculating the con-
centration of free HNO , 2c was subtracted from the
the fact that the concentration of free HNO in solu-
3
tions varied from 1.5 to 2.6 M. However, it is possible
to estimate these deviations. In particular, it follows
from the reference data on the HNO density that its
3
change is no more than 3.3 rel. % in this interval of
concentrations, which is the maximal error of the
measurements. The second reason consists in the fact
that the NAPS density was measured at room tem-
perature, which varied within the range 20 28 C. It
was experimentally found that the density variation
under these conditions was about 1.5%.
3
Pd
+
found total acidity, as two H ions are released into
solution upon Pd(II) precipitation with DMG.
Several techniques were tested for the acidity deter-
mination. The first (method no. 1) consisted in that
a NAPS aliquot diluted by a factor of 12.5 was treated
Finally, a direct pH-metric titration of freshly pre-
pared NAPS solutions resulted in the formation of
dark brown precipitates. In this case, it was necessary
to wait for no less than 1 h for reaching a stable po-
tential; therefore, this technique is unacceptable.
with a tenfold amount of solid NaNO relative to
2
Pd(II) for quantitative binding of Pd(II) in the tetra-
nitro complex, with the subsequent pH-metric titration
to pH 6.8 7.0. Unreliability of this technique con-
sisted, firstly, in the formation of small amounts of
nitrogen oxides. Secondly, the titration curves of free
HNO and of the same amount of HNO with an addi-
To check the correctness of techniques for the acid-
ity determination, we have carried out introduced
found experiments using model solutions. They were
prepared by the dissolving accurately weighed por-
tions of crystalline [Pd(NO ) (H O) ] in a fixed
3
3
tion of Na [Pd(NO ) ] and of the required excess of
2
2 4
NaNO differed essentially.
2
3 2
2
2
The second technique (method no. 2) was based on
the results of [5 7] where it was proved that Pd(II) is
volume of HNO of precisely known concentration.
3
The final volume of such solutions was always higher
quantitatively extracted as compounds [Pd(NO ) L ]
3 2 2
than the initial HNO volume; therefore, to express
3
with sulfides according to Eq. (2), with the concentra-
concentrations in the M scale, we determined the
densities of the model solutions.
tion of free HNO remaining unchanged during the
3
process:
Method no. 3 gives the maximum discrepancy of
1.5% between the found and introduced amounts.
However, it is rather labor-consuming, and a DMG
excess larger than 10%, as well as wrong choice of an
indicator, result in the substantial overestimation of
the NAPS acidity. These drawbacks are compensated
by the possibility of the exact determination of both
{Pd2+ + 2NO3}(aq) + 2L(org)
[PdL2(NO3)2](org), (2)
where L designates a molecule of coordinated sulfide.
Then the raffinate containing only HNO was titrated
3
with a standard alkali solution. This technique of the
acidity determination could be close to ideal if it were
possible to determine precisely the volume of the raf-
finate after the separation of Pd(II) by extraction. It
appeared to be extremely difficult; therefore, for cal-
culations we used eight parameters and six equations,
which resulted in the accumulation of errors and low
reproducibility.
c
and the concentration of free HNO from a single
Pd
3
NAPS sample. The causes of regular errors in the
results obtained by method nos. 1 and 2 were con-
sidered above. For the other methods, the deviation of
acidity from that of model solutions did not exceed
5.6 (no. 2) and +9.4% (no. 1).
The third technique (method no. 3) allowed us to
NMR studies of NAPSs. The in situ determination
of the concentration of components in nearly saturated
solutions, like NAPSs under study, is a difficult prob-
lem. The NMR method seems to be the most informa-
tive in these cases. To elucidate its possibilities, we
have carried out several series of experiments in which
we varied the following parameters of solutions: con-
centrations of nitric acid and nitrate ions and the
determine simultaneously the content of free HNO
3
and also c during NAPS storage. Using the data
Pd
of Fig. 2, we took NAPS weighed portions, diluted
them with water approximately to 50 ml, and precipi-
tated Pd(II) with dimethylglyoxime (DMG) by the
standard procedure [8]. The difference from the tech-
nique [8] consisted in that the separated precipitate
was washed only with hot water without its acidifica-
+
2+
nature of a nitrate salt cation (Na or Zn ). Taking
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED CHEMISTRY Vol. 80 No. 5 2007