Thus, in this system electrochemistry not only provides a direct
readout process for the DAP–flavin binding event through the
change in voltage of the flavin reduction process but also provides
a means of modulating the host–guest binding event.
In conclusion, we have shown that the electronic effects of
functionality attached to the C(7) position of flavin derivatives
play an important role in modulating the redox properties of the
unit. In contrast, they do not significantly modulate the hydro-
gen bonding affinity for receptor 7. The similar binding efficien-
cies of the oxidised flavin derivatives 1 and 6 with compound 7
provide direct access to a prototype three-component redox
controlled switch whereby the differing onset of the radical
anion states of derivatives 1 and 6 can be sequentially read by
the application of increasing negative potential. These results
pave the way for the formation of new flavin-based molecular
devices addressed by electrochemically controlled host–guest
complexation. The results of our investigations in this area will
be reported in due course.
Fig. 4 Schematic representation of the three-component electro-
chemical switch derived from 1, 6 and 7.
GC gratefully acknowledges the EPSRC for supporting this
work and The Royal Society of Edinburgh for a Support Research
Fellowship. VR acknowledges the NSF (US) CHE-0808945.
Notes and references
w This article is dedicated to Prof. Seiji Shinkai on the occasion of his
65th birthday.
y Crystal data for 1: 4(C16H19N5O2)ꢃC7H8: Mr = 1345.58, Z = 1,
ꢀ
triclinic, P1, a = 10.3010(4), b = 11.8400(5), c = 16.1447(7) A,
a = 106.983(2), b = 108.228(2), g = 106.322(2)1, V = 1631.48(12) A3,
T = 100(2) K, Nmeas = 39465, Nind = 5795, Rint = 0.041, Robs
Fig. 5 Cyclic voltammogram of an equimolar mixture of 1 and 6
(B1 mmol) before (—) and after (ꢃ ꢃ ꢃ) the addition of DAP 7
(B10 mmol). Inset shows CV for cycles between ꢁ0.2 and ꢁ1.6 V.
(all data) = 0.041 (0.068), wR2 (all data) = 0.096 (0.104).
obs
Scan rate 100 mV sꢁ1
.
1 (a) K. Stevenson and V. Massey, in Flavins and Flavoproteins. 1996,
ed. C. Willams, University of Calgary, Calgary, 1997;
(b) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes, ed. F. Muller,
CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1991, vol. 1–3.
2 For examples see: V. Massey and P. Hemmerich, in The Enzymes,
ed. P. D. Boyer, Academic Press, New York, 1976, vol. 12,
pp. 191–240R. Swenson, G. Krey and M. Eren, in Flavins and
Flavoproteins, ed. D. Edmondson, D. McKormick de Gruyter,
Berlin, 1987, pp. 98–107.
that dictate binding affinity via the ‘‘meta’’ position of the
phenyl unit. In contrast, the C(7) position is in direct resonance
communication with the central redox core of the flavin unit,
thereby significantly influencing its redox properties.
In recent years, an enormous amount of effort has been
directed towards the development of molecular switches.9
Flavin–DAP systems are attractive moieties for developing
switches as it is well established that the specific DAP–flavin
recognition process affords a write state that can be read
electrochemically due to the shift in flavin reduction potential
that accompanies the hydrogen bonding mediated stabilisation
of the flavin radꢁ state.7 Systems 1–7 offer the exciting ability to
create a novel three-component write–read molecular switch,10
whereby the binding between 7 and oxidised flavins can be
sequentially electrochemically read by adjusting the redox
window of the reduction process (Fig. 4). To test this hypo-
thesis we have investigated the formation of a prototype
three-component switch from derivatives 1, 6 and 7. The CV
of an equimolar solution of 1 and 6 is shown in Fig. 5
and clearly shows that the disparate onset of their radicꢁal
3 S. Ghisla and V. Massey, Biochem. J., 1986, 239, 1.
4 For examples see: (a) M. L. Ludwig, L. M. Schopfer,
A. L. Metzger, K. A. Pattridge and V. Massey, Biochemistry,
1990, 29, 10364; (b) Y. V. S. N. Murthy, Y. Meah and
V. Massey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5344.
5 For recent reviews see: (a) A. Niemz and V. M. Rotello, Acc. Chem.
Res., 1999, 32, 44; (b) V. M. Rotello, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 1999,
3, 747; (c) Y. Yano, Rev. Heteroat. Chem., 2000, 22, 151.
6 For recent examples see: (a) Y.-M. Legrand, M. Gray, G. Cooke and
V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15789; (b) J. J. Hasford
and C. J. Rizzo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 2251;
(c) D. E. Edmondson and S. Ghisla, in Flavins and Flavoproteins,
ed. S. Ghisla, P. Kroneck P. Macheroux and H. Sund, Rudolf
Weber, Agency For Scientific Publications, Berlin, 1999, pp. 71–76.
7 E. Breinlinger, A. Niemz and V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1995, 117, 5379.
8 A. Niemz and V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 6833.
9 Molecular Switches, ed. B. L. Feringa, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001.
10 For a previous example of a three-component flavin-based mole-
cular switch see: R. Deans, A. Niemz, E. C. Breinlinger and
V. M. Rotello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 10863.
anion states allows the sequential formation of 1radꢁ and 6rad
.
Upon the addition of DAP and cycling the applied potential
between ꢁ0.3 and ꢁ2.4 V, both of the redox waves are shifted
to a more positive potential (100 mV), which corresponds to a
11 The redox-based enhancement in recognition can be calculated
using a thermodynamic cycle, which can be expressed mathemati-
1/2(bound)ꢁE1/2(unbound))
cally using: Ka(red)/Ka(ox)
=
e(nF/RT)(E
.
new Ka of B22 000 Mꢁ1 for 7.1rad and 7.6rad
.
By adjusting
ꢁ
ꢁ 11
Ka(red) and Ka(ox) are the association constants in the reduced
and oxidised forms, and E1/2(bound) and E1/2(unbound) are the
half-wave redox potentials in the receptor bound and unbound
states.
the applied voltage to cycle between ꢁ0.2 and ꢁ1.6 V it is possible
to only read the 7.6 binding event in the presence of derivative 1.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
1352 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 1350–1352